|
(As with before, you may wish to print this out and read it at your leisure rather than reading it all online and straining your eyes the whole time. Whatever you prefer. If you're viewing this on facebook, to view the full thing you'll need to go to my blog. It's too long to be imported in full by facebook. Here's the link: http://www.xanga.com/cookie_monster44)
“Did Jesus ever have a wounded heart? If so, when and how?
And if not, why not? And if not, then why should we have them? If not, what was
He doing that kept His heart from being wounded?
Can a heart that is hidden in Christ ever be wounded by the
stones of this world? If a heart has been broken by God can it still be wounded
by men?”
Last summer I privately asked these questions of a friend in
the midst of a month of tremendous transformation in my life. I had discovered
in late June, 2006 that I was not who I thought I had been all twenty years my
life, and as you can imagine, it shook my world. I discovered that “the ‘real
I’ was my human spirit in union with Christ.” As I wrote at the time:
“Who am I, my true self at the core? My true self is my
spirit united with Christ. And as such, every character trait, gift, talent,
ability, fruit, blessing, etc. found in Christ is in my true self as well! As
Hudson Taylor put it, “It is a wonderful thing to be really one with a
risen and exalted Saviour, to be a member of Christ! Think what it involves.
Can Christ be rich and I poor? Can your right hand be rich and your left poor?
or your head be well fed while your body starves?” Talk about a discovery that will change
your life…wow!
In Christ:
~I am blessed with every spiritual blessing. (Ephesians 1:3)
~I am holy and blameless. (Ephesians 1:4)
~I have a spirit of power, love, and sound mind. (2 Timothy
1:7)
~I am healed by the stripes of Jesus. (1 Peter 2:24, Isaiah
53:5)
~I am delivered from the power of darkness. (Colossians
1:13)
~I am redeemed from the curse of the law. (1 Peter 1:18-19)
~I am sealed by God. (2 Corinthians 1:21-22)
~I am a new creation. (2 Corinthians 5:17)
~I am God’s child. (John 1:12, Galatians 3:26)
~I am clothed with Christ. (Galatians 3:27)
~I am forgiven and washed in His blood. (1 John 2:12 &
1:9, Ephesians 1:7, Hebrews 9:14, Colossians 1:14)
~I am a temple of the Holy Spirit. (1 Corinthians 6:19)
~I am a saint. (Romans 1:7, Philippians 1:1)
~I am the bride of Christ. (Revelation 19:7)
~I am the head and not the tail, I am above and not beneath.
(Deuteronomy 28:13)
~I am dead to sin. (Romans 6:2&11, 1 Peter 2:24)
~I am God’s beloved. (Deuteronomy 33:12)
~I am more than a conqueror. (Romans 8:37)
~I am co-heir with Christ. (Romans 8:17)
~I am free from condemnation. (Romans 8:1)
~I am born of God and the evil one does not touch me. (1
John 5:18)
~I am God’s masterpiece. (Ephesians 2:10)
~I am an ambassador of Christ. (2 Corinthians 5:20)
~I am called by God to a holy life. (2 Timothy 1:9)
~I am the salt of the earth. (Matthew 5:13)
~I am the light of the world. (Matthew 5:14)
~I am God’s friend. (John 15:15)
~I am a member of Christ’s body. (1 Corinthians 12:27)
~I cannot be separated from God’s love. (Romans 8:38-39)
~I am a citizen of Heaven. (Philippians 3:20)
~I am a branch of the true vine. (John 15:1&5)
~I am one through whom Christ can do all things.
(Philippians 4:13)
~I am seated with Christ in the heavenly realms. (Ephesians
2:6)
~I am hidden with Christ. (Colossians 3:3)
~I am one spirit with Christ. (1 Corinthians 6:17)
~I am complete. (Colossians 2:10)
Since my true self is united with Christ, then my true self
is every bit as: loving, joyful, peaceful, patient, kind, good, faithful, free
from jealousy, humble, forgiving, without pride, selfless, self-giving,
forgetful of sins, truthful, compassionate, caring, protecting, trusting,
hopeful, persevering, gracious, slow to anger, just, pure, solid, miraculous,
permanent, sweet, fresh, vibrant, never weary, big, intimate, born of the
heart, true, clean, electric, creative, excellent, passionate, respectful,
graceful, fearless, Spirit-filled, gentle, dedicated, devoted, integrous,
heroic, filled with love for the Father, and for other people, among countless
other attributes, as Christ is!
Plumbing the depths of Christ is a journey for all eternity,
but the more we discover He is, the more our minds can be renewed to realize we
are in Him too. In discovering all this, we are never to forget that we are only
the vessels and He is the treasure inside. “I live, yet not I.” But even as we
remember that, we never forget that all is ours in Christ, and all is ours in
Christ right now. Because the spiritual world is not bound by time or
space, but exists outside of it (more on this as I discover it in a different
post), then what is true of me in the future is true of me now, and has been
true of me in the past as well, though I did not realize it then. On the flip
side, what is not true of me in the future is not true of me now, and
has been not true of me in the past as well. The eternal is truth, the temporal
is not. And the truth is Christ in me, the hope of glory, the Word of God in
its, His fullness.”
Discovering this central truth of Christ in me as my real,
true identity has had a ripple effect across more areas of my life than I can
count since then. In the first month that followed I tried to capture in words
that I could share with my friends all that was happening in me, all I was
learning. This post was the result.
If you haven’t read it yet, you should stop right here and go read that before
you read the rest of this, because everything I’ve learned and will be writing
about since then is based on what I learned and wrote about there. If you have
read it before, go read it again. Refresh your mind.
As Alan Leininger, one of my business advisors, has said,
“It’s not the things you don’t know that will hurt you most; it’s the things
you think are true but aren’t.” Human beings are very logical creatures (with
some exceptions, but I won’t name any names here!). We use logic to take two or
more pieces of information and fit them together into a consistent whole, then
we live our lives based on the conclusions we have drawn from that process. But conclusions drawn from logic are only
as good as the accuracy of the information the conclusions are drawn from.
If the information is inaccurate, then no matter how logical the conclusions
drawn from it are, they will still be wrong, grounded in something other than
reality. This point is proved well in a fascinating quote my friend Samuel
shared with me a while back about mental disorders:
“If the great
reasoners are often maniacal, it is equally true that maniacs are commonly
great reasoners….Every one who has had the misfortune to talk with people in
the heart or on the edge of mental disorder knows that their most sinister
quality is a horrible clarity of detail; a connecting of one thing with another
in a map more elaborate than a maze. If you argue with a madman, it is
extremely probable that you will get the worst of it; for in many ways his mind
moves all the quicker for not being delayed by the things that go with good
judgment. He is not hampered by a sense of humor or by charity, or by the dumb
certainties of experience. He is the more logical for losing certain sane
affections. Indeed, the common phrase for insanity is in this respect a
misleading one. The madman is not the
man who has lost his reason. The madman is the one who has lost everything
except his reason.” (G.K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy chapter 2)
If I believe that A + B = C and that C = 4 because I believe
that A and B are both equal to 2, then any conclusions I come to regarding the
role of C in my life are only as good as the accuracy of my belief in the
identity of A and B. If B actually equals 7, then I need to change my
conclusions about C or I’ll be living in denial. This is why the things you
think are true (and have drawn other conclusions from) but actually aren’t are
so dangerous. So when I discovered that such a core belief as my true identity
had been wrong most of my life, it rocked my world. It forced me to look at
some of my conclusions about what my “C’s” truly equaled and reexamine them in
the light of what I now believed to be true. The new conclusions I came to soon
led to opening up and reexamining other conclusions I had drawn from those
first conclusions, and so on and so forth, hence the ripple effect. If you
throw a big enough rock into a lake, it will eventually send waves to all parts
of that lake.
The questions I asked at the beginning of this post were all
a part of that process of opening up and reexamining conclusions and beliefs I
had either taken for granted in my life or had never even thought about before.
What I wrote last summer in my post captured just the first few waves; what
I’ve learned this last year has taken me into some much deeper waters. I asked
those questions simultaneously in a series of e-mails with a friend, and the
answer I came up with, especially the final question at the end, didn’t make
her happy. I’ll share the answer I came up with back then later on in this
post, but I found the answer to be very exciting, not offensive
Still excited about what I was beginning to believe, but
frustrated at my lack of ability to communicate it effectively, I attempted to
explain how we didn’t have to remain wounded to another friend, also wounded,
and she didn’t quite share my point of view either. The first friend summed up
both their objections with a piercing question I quoted near the end of my long
post: “When theory hits the reality of a sinful world, what happens?” To
effectively speak, write, or share with others in any form this hope of
transformation, I would have to be someone transformed. I couldn’t just tell somebody that healing from lifelong
wounds was possible, I had to show
them. I had to live the answer.
“It is perfectly easy
to go on all your life giving explanations of religion, love, morality, honour,
and the like, without having been inside any of them. And if you do that, you are simply playing with counters. You go on
explaining a thing without knowing what it is. That is why a great deal of
contemporary thought is, strictly speaking, thought about nothing--all the
apparatus of thought busily working in a vacuum.” (C.S. Lewis, God in the
Dock, p.214) (Emphasis mine)
“I’m recalling
something I read from Oxford Bishop Richard Harries: ‘One of the most
remarkable religious publications this century was the book of sermons by Harry
Williams entitled The True Wilderness.
This spoke to millions because, as he avowed, there came a point in his life
when he was unwilling to preach anything that was not true to his own
experience.’ That is the secret of a truly powerful messenger, who carries weight,
whom God will use mightily. Can you imagine the effect if every pastor made
that vow? Too many men are far too willing to offer their thoughts on subjects
in which they have no real personal experience--especially experiences of God--and their ‘wisdom’ is
not grounded in reality. It is theory, at best, more likely speculation,
untested and unproven. At its worst it amounts to stolen ideas. Such clutter
fills the shelves of most bookstores.” (John Eldredge, Way of the Wild
Heart, p.262)
I don’t want to offer just empty words, and I don’t want to
learn from those who write them. My prayer is that I might live the truths I
have found and attempt to share here, and that these words would reflect that.
May you be transformed, as I am being, “till Christ be formed in you”
(Galatians 4:19).
Incarnational Reality
So where to start? To believe you can be transformed you
have to first believe transformation is possible. This sounds blatantly obvious
to many people, and indeed if you had asked me growing up if transformation was
possible I would have readily answered in the affirmative. If, however, you had
asked me why I believed
transformation was possible, I don’t know if I could have given a solid answer.
As I’ve already written a bit about above this, all that changed with the
discovery of my identity in Christ and what Leanne Payne terms “incarnational
reality.” An obvious question presents itself in the light of this belief: “If
this is who I really, truly am in Christ, not in theory but in reality, how do
I become this person?” I love the way Henri Nouwen asks this with his wonderful
use of the name “Beloved”, a word/name that has come to mean very much to me in
this past year:
“I say this because, as
soon as we catch a glimpse of this truth (our Belovedness), we are put on a journey in search of the
fullness of that truth and we will not rest until we can rest in that truth.
From the moment we claim the truth of being the Beloved, we are faced with the call to become who we are. Becoming the
Beloved is the great spiritual journey we have to make…If it is true that we
not only are the Beloved, but also have to become the Beloved; if it is true that we not only are children of God, but also have to become children of God; if it is true that we not
only are brothers and sisters, but
also have to become brothers and
sisters…if all that is true, how then can we get a grip on this process of
becoming? If the spiritual life is not
simply a way of being, but also a way of becoming, what then is the nature of
this becoming?” (Life of the Beloved p. 43-45)
I love that ending question, and would love to let it just
sit in you for a while, but Nouwen himself doesn’t wait long before offering an
answer.
“Becoming the Beloved
means letting the truth of our Belovedness become infleshed in everything we
think, say, or do. It entails a long and painful process of appropriation or,
better, incarnation. As long as “being the Beloved” is little more than a
beautiful thought or lofty idea that hangs above my life to keep me from being
depressed, nothing really changes. What is required is to become the Beloved in
the commonplaces of my daily existence and, bit by bit, to close the gap that
exists between what I know myself to be and the countless specific realities of
everyday life. Becoming the Beloved is
pulling the truth revealed to me from above down into the ordinariness of what
I am, in fact, talking about, and doing from hour to hour.” (Life of
the Beloved p. 45-46)
Mario Bergner sums up the answer:
“To the Christian, all becoming is incarnational--it is a life that is poured into us from on
high. That Life is Jesus.” (Setting Love in Order p. 100)
All becoming is incarnational!
But what does that mean? What does the term “incarnational reality” mean,
anyway? I use it freely in my life now, but a few years back it would have been
mostly gibberish to me, like it probably sounds to most of you right now as
well. Simply put, incarnational reality is what I wrote about in my previous
post. It is about the reality Christ in us, the Spirit of God dwelling inside
human beings and transforming us from the inside out. Mario Bergner, writing
about his journey to healing from a homosexual lifestyle, tells of how he first
tasted incarnational reality.
“The power of the
great truth, ‘Christ in you, the hope of glory’ (Colossians 1:27), became a
tangible reality in me a few months after I received that life-changing
infilling of the Holy Spirit. I was by this time in the habit of beginning
every day by setting my eyes on God through Scripture reading and prayer.
After reading Brother
Lawrence’s The Practice of the Presence of God and accounts of Frank C. Laubach’s spiritual walk, I decided to start
trying some of the things they did. I would call to mind the holy name of Jesus
as often as possible. First, I decided to call on His name at least once each
hour of the day. Gradually I would increase to once every half hour, then to
every fifteen minutes, then to calling on Him every minute. Of course I failed
miserably at the beginning, sometimes with hours going by without thinking of
it. Then I would simply begin again, making sure not to inflict any false guilt
on myself for not doing it. After a while, I found if I forgot to practice
God’s presence, I would be reminded by the Spirit within me to do so. On many a
morning I would awake and hear the Spirit calling on the name of Jesus from
within me. Soon I noticed that whenever my thoughts would wander, they would
wander toward Him.
As I purposely
practiced the presence of God by looking up and out of myself and calling to
mind the name of Jesus as often as possible, I began to notice the beauty of
the world around me--in my students, my cat, the landscape of southeastern
Ohio.
One spring afternoon,
I sat in the office of the Chairman of the Theatre Department at the university
where I was teaching. The rest of the faculty filled the chairs around the
chairman’s desk. Behind his desk was a large picture window with the drapes
fully opened. The winter’s snow had melted, and green leaf buds dotted every
branch.
Shortly after the
meeting started, my thoughts began to wander. I began to give thanks to Jesus
for the beauty of His creation and for the budding trees outside the window.
Noticing that my full
attention was not invested in the meeting, the chairman asked me, ‘Mario, are
you with us?’
‘Sorry,’ I replied.
As the meeting
continued, I was extra careful not to gaze out this large picture window.
Rather, at the next moment of boredom, I looked down at my hands and gently
pinched the skin over one of the knuckles of my left hand with the thumb and
index finger of my right hand. While lifting this tiny pinch of skin off my
knuckle and suspending it between my two fingers, I thought to myself, God’s
beauty and reality is being mediated to me through the spring scene outside the
window; how much more beautiful and real is the Spirit of God indwelling this
tiny pinch of my skin.
Suddenly the meaning
of Christ being in me washed over me
like waves of living waters. I then realized that if God’s Spirit was
mysteriously living in that tiny pinch of skin being lifted off my knuckle,
that His very presence was also permeating through every cell and fiber of my body, whether I felt it or
not. The words of 1 Corinthians 6:10-20 (RSV) flowed through me like
life-giving blood: ‘Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy
Spirit within you, which you have
from God? You are not your own; you were bought with a price. So glorify God in
your body.’
While this truth was
still flowing through my mind, I looked at the tip of my pinky finger and
realized that if all I had of the Spirit
of God indwelling me was what was in the tip of this tiny finger, I would have
enough divine power to be healed. From that moment forward, I knew in the
deepest part of my heart that I would be completely healed from homosexuality.
And I eventually was. Sheer joy welled up from within me. I must have been
glowing with religious awe.
Unbeknown to me, the
chairman had been catching glimpses of me during this entire time. As I stared
in wonderment at the tip of my pinky and the reality of the power of God
indwelling it, he asked in a most peculiar voice, ‘Mario, what on earth is
going on over there?’
Embarrassed that I had
once again been caught not paying attention, I replied, ‘Oh, you’d never
understand this if I told you.’
‘Try me,’ he quipped.
Not knowing any other
words to use to describe my discovery of this age-old truth, I joyfully shared
with him and the rest of the faculty members team a term I had learned from
Leanne Payne. ‘I’ve just come into Incarnational Reality!’
His face went
completely blank, and he stared at me without any expression for several
seconds. Then his eyes blinked a few times, and he finally looked away without
saying a word back to me. The faculty meeting simply continued.
From that day forward,
I related to my body in a completely different way. It wasn’t just a body; it
was the temple of the Holy Spirit. Whenever I had a fleshly desire, I refused
to despise my body for it. Rather, I practiced the presence of Jesus until the
sinful desire and temptation ceased. This is not some pie-in-the-sky platitude
nor esoteric theology. It is a down-to-earth, practical and ordinary reality
available to every Christian.
When I came to Christ
in my teens, I never heard any teaching on union with Christ through the Holy
Spirit indwelling the believer. It was only ten years later, after attending
Leanne Payne’s adult Christian education class and later receiving the powerful
infilling of the Holy Spirit at that little church in Ohio, that I came into
the reality of ‘Another living in me.’ This reality is a central truth to the
healing of persons.
In every Christian there is a healthy place within, that internal place where he is in union
with Christ. About those who love
Him, Jesus said, ‘My father will love him, and we will come to him and make our
home with him’ (John 14:23b). From that
home within, we can dare to listen to our hearts and all that is within them.
The Christian who finds after conversion that his heart is filled with garbage
(as I did) is equipped to sort through all his inner confusion once he is
assured of that healthy place within. That place where Jesus and the Father
have made their home.
Of the eighty times
the word union appears in Today’s English Version of the New Testament,
seventy-nine times it refers to the believer’s union with Christ. One seminary
professor of mine constantly reminds his students, ‘the theme of being “in
Christ” is so prevalent in the writings of St. Paul that it practically appears on every
page of his epistles.’
This mystical union
between the believer and God is the reality that empowers us to be transformed
from the inside out. It ought not to be confused with monism where God is in
everything, or with New Age (Gnostic) notions about man being or becoming God.
As Orthodox theologian Father Kallistos Ware has said, ‘Although ‘oned’ with
the divine, man still remains man; he is not swallowed up or annihilated…’
This union with Christ
also empowers the believer’s prayer life. Evangelical theologian Dr. Donald
Bloesch writes:
‘Still
another way in which Christ makes a genuine prayer life possible is by His
dwelling within the hearts of believers. He not only intercedes for us in
heaven, but by His Spirit he makes his abode within the deepest recesses of our
being. We can therefore call on Him with confidence and assurance because He is
infinitely near. Paul reminds his hearers, “Do you not realize Jesus Christ is
in you?” (2 Corinthians 13:5) Confidently he proclaimed, “Christ in you, the
hope of glory’ (Colossians 1:27). Within the being of every Christian there is
an inner light, a voice within, which moves us toward prayer. And this inner
presence is an abiding refuge in times of trial and tribulation.’
It was the reality of
Christ in the believer that enabled the early Christians to suffer martyrdom
with such joy. In A.D. 202 Septimus Severus, emperor of the Roman
Empire, issued an edict outlawing the spread of Christianity. This
edict was directed especially against new converts and their teachers. One new
convert, Felicitas, was pregnant at the time of her arrest. She was imprisoned
for many months and during that time she gave birth to a baby girl. Seeing her
moan in childbirth, her jailers asked how she expected to face the beasts in
the arena. She answered, ‘Now my sufferings are only mine. But when I face the
beasts, there will be another who will live in me and will suffer for me since I shall be suffering for Him’ (italics
mine).
This reality of ‘Another living in me’ was key to my healing from
homosexuality, and it is key to the healing of all persons. For no matter what horrible memory came up,
no matter what vile sin was revealed from within my heart, no matter what petty
or ludicrous thought raced through my mind, no matter what soul-shaking pain
overcame me, I now knew that Jesus was living in me. Because there was ‘Another living in me,’ I had the courage to face
the beasts within the arena of my heart. That healthy place where Jesus indwelt
me was my true center.” (Setting Love in Order p. 95-99)
A healthy place within? A true center? Leanne Payne, a
co-worker and mentor to Mario Bergner, explains further.
“To experience this
prayer (Ephesians 3:16-17) fulfilled in our lives is to find our true center,
the ‘home within’ that is solid and strong, a place of rest and strength. From
that center we live. From that center we ‘abide’ in Christ and He in us. We are
to practice His presence. We no longer have to live from the center of the
lower self, the unspiritual or incomplete self which is compelled and driven
from its position of self-centeredness.
Fr. John Gaynor Banks
writes of this true center:
‘There
is a center in every man in which and through which God works. To that Center
He speaks; through that Center He acts. When a man discovers his own divine
Center, he stands at the gateway to a very powerful living.’
But we can be
Christians and yet, when immature or unhealed psychologically, fail to live
from our true center. Rather, we live out of a complex of diseased feelings,
attitudes, and, as we shall see, images or symbols that have nothing to do with
our new selves in Christ.” (The Healing Presence p. 81-82)
Healing the first wound/
seeing others rightly
Since I found myself unable to effectively communicate this
hope of transformation to others, I set out to apply what I was learning to my
own life and to finally face some issues in my own life I had never really been
able to deal with before. The first and most glaringly obvious issue was my
attitude towards my father. Without going into my whole family history here, I
grew up in an alcoholic household. After many, many lapses, my father finally
conquered that. More persistent than that, however, was his addiction to
cigarettes. For ten plus years he had promised us he would quit, and he would
try numerous times each year, but the longest he ever made it was almost three
months. And he was not pleasant to be around when he was off nicotine, usually,
so the innumerable attempts wore on us all, but it was still better than when
he wasn’t trying. The point of this all is to say that I had developed an “I’ll
believe it when I see it” attitude about his ability to quit smoking, which
represented for me all the rest of his addictions and anger issues and
shortcomings. I no longer believed that he would ever really change.
The discovery of incarnational reality changed all that. If I now view myself differently not
because of anything different I’ve done but simply because Christ lives in me,
should I not also view fellow believers that I encounter differently simply
because Christ dwells in them too? More specifically, if my dad is in
Christ and Christ in him, then I need to learn to be able to see him just as I
am now learning to see myself--as a new creation in whom the old things have
passed away! Just as with myself, it’s not because he’s done anything specifically that I begin to view him this way, but
rather because of what Christ has
done. He truly is a new creation in Christ and I need to see him that way, even
if he never does or ever steps into the new life freely available to him.
I love this thought from Mike Mason:
“We gain access to
heaven by believing in God through Jesus Christ. Similarly, we gain access to
earth by believing in people, also through Jesus Christ…
…In order to believe
in people we must make a decision to know only the good in them. If our eyes
are open, we’ll see the evil too, but we must decide to know only the good.
After all, only the good can truly be known. Good reveals, evil conceals. The evil in people is what keeps us from
knowing them. To know them, we must look to the good.
By looking at people
with the eyes of faith--past all the masks, the games, the lies--we pierce
through to the truth of the person whom God created. God did not create anyone to be a failure, a thief, a drunk, a bore.
This is not who people are. Who, then, are they?” (Practicing the
Presence of People p. 31-32)
John Hyde, a missionary in India around 1900, also learned to
look at the good in people.
“Mr. Hyde had a
wonderful experience, to which he owed, I believe, his power with God, and
therefore with man. He used to speak of it as one of the most direct and solemn
lessons God had ever taught him. He was up in the hills resting for a short
time. He had been burdened about the spiritual condition of a certain pastor,
and he resolved to spend some time in definite intercession for him. Entering
into his ‘inner chamber,’ he began pouring out his heart to his Heavenly Father
concerning his brother somewhat as follows:
‘O God! Thou knowest
that brother how--‘ ‘cold’ he was going to say, when suddenly a Hand seemed to
be laid on his lips, and a Voice said to him in stern reproach, ‘He that
toucheth him, toucheth the apple of Mine eye.’ A great horror came over him. He
had been guilty before God of ‘accusing the brethren.’ He had been ‘judging’
his brother. He felt rebuked and humbled before God. It was he himself who
first needed putting right. He confessed this sin. He claimed the precious
Blood of Christ that cleanseth from all sin! ‘Whatsoever things are lovely…if
there be any virtue, if there be any praise, think on these things.’ Then he
cried out, ‘Father, show me what things are lovely and of good report in my
brother’s life.’ Like a flash he remembered how that brother had given up all
for Christ, enduring much suffering from relations whom he had given up. He was
reminded of his years of hard work, of the tact with which he had managed his
difficult congregation, of the many quarrels he had healed, of what a model
husband he was. One thing after another rose up before him and so all of his
prayer season was spent in praise for his brother instead of in prayer.
He could not recall a
single petition, nothing but thanksgiving! God was opening up His servant’s
eyes to the highest of ministries, that of praise.
Mark the result also
on that brother’s life! When Mr. Hyde went down to the plains, he found that
just then the brother had received a great spiritual uplift. While he was
praising, God was blessing. A wonderful Divine Law, the law of a Father’s love. While we bless God for any child of His,
He delights to bless that one!
This was the secret of
John Hyde’s power with God. He saw the good in God’s little ones, and so was able to appreciate God’s work of
grace in that heart. Hence He supplied the heavenly atmosphere of praise in
which God’s love was free to work in all its fullness.
This, too, was what
gave him power with men. We are attracted to those who appreciate us. All our powers expand in their presence,
and we are with them at our best. Hence they call out all that is good in us,
and we feel uplifted when with them.
To such souls we turn
as naturally as the flowers to the sun, and our hearts expand and bloom out
with a fragrance that surprises even ourselves.
Now this is a law that
holds good especially with children, and with those who are yet young in the
Christian life. The more mature God’s people are the less they depend on man’s
approbation or censure, but not so when they are children. Remember, too, our
Lord’s solemn warning against casting a stumbling block in the way of any of
His little ones! When we look at their faults, we shrivel up their energies,
they are at their worst. In a word, we encourage their faults by thinking
about them.
Let us remember above
all else that God’s people on this earth are in the making. This is His
workshop and souls are being fashioned and formed in it. The final polishing
touches we will not receive in the present life, but when this body of our
humiliation has been transformed. Suppose you go into a carpenter’s shop and
begin to find fault with his unfinished chairs and tables! You say, ‘How rough
this is! What an ugly corner that is!’ The carpenter will doubtless get angry
and say, ‘Bear in mind that I am still making these things. They are not yet finished. Come and see the
pattern after which they are being fashioned. See, this is what they will
yet be like when I have done with them.’ He shows you beautiful chairs and
tables--shining, perfectly formed, polished to perfection! Is the carpenter not
right? Is the critic not in the wrong? The
one looks at the things which are lovely and eternal. The other at those which
are unlovely and, thank God, fleeting.
Would you have power
with God and man for the upbuilding of the Indian Church--of
any Church? Follow the method of the Carpenter of Nazareth who never broke the bruised reed,
who never quenched the smoking wick, no matter how much smoke it was giving
out. He turned His eyes to the light of God, there burning dimly, and by doing
so blew it into a flame till erring disciples became the Light of the World.
This is the way of Love and of Eternal Hope. The other way is the way of sense
and of present fact and failure--all of which are fleeting--none of which is
the Eternal Truth in Eternal Love.
I never met a man
whose very presence seemed to help the weak become strong, the sinful to
repent, the erring to walk aright so much as John Hyde. The secret of his
success in building up the people of God lay in this method of looking for
all the good in men and making it so to
expand that the evil was driven out for want of room. Then should we shut our
eyes to the faults of all? Should we never reprove sin? Turn to our Lord. Did
He not do so at times? Yes, to the impenitent--to those who opposed Him and
would not come to Him for help. Just because He was in the habit of looking at
all that was good--for that very reason He was able to reprove with all the
greater power. No one could do so more severely than our Lord just because He
loved much and sympathized so much with all that was good in men.” (Praying
Hyde, edited by E.G. Carre p. 136-140)
Seeing Christ in my dad doesn’t mean I ignore or deny Dad’s
faults, but that I see something greater than them (Christ Himself) in him and no longer define him by his faults.
At the same time, seeing Christ in him doesn’t mean I must accept the flaws as
an unchanging part of him and resign myself to dealing with them the rest of
my/his life. Seeing Christ in people is nothing like the worldly “virtue” of
tolerance.
“It is one thing to
accept a person where he or she is, and another to accept their malignant
behavior that works against them as well as others. It is also one thing to
accept the real person who stands
before you needing to be freed, and another to accept (and direct a kindly
tolerance toward) his or her old carnal self who dons whatever ‘face’ the
occasion might call for while preventing the real, creative self from coming
forward. Jesus Christ never wasted His time energy, and prayer by helping a
person ‘practice the presence’ of the old carnal self. He didn’t converse with
it, or exercise the great virtue of kindness toward it. He paid attention to it
only by saying, ‘Die to it!’
The practice of the
presence of Jesus is vital on the part of one who would minister healing in His
name. In practicing His presence (within
myself as well as without and all about), I also pray to see those I minister
to through His eyes, and His eyes alone. Through years of doing this, I am
convinced that He so loves and concentrates on freeing the real person that He
hardly sees the old illusory one once it has been discerned and named as the
usurper it is. Rather, His lovingkindness blazes out in healing light toward
the real person He created.”
(Leanne Payne, The Broken Image p. 105-106)
As Mike Mason spoke of earlier, the evil we see in people is
not who they truly are, at least not in this life while they still can choose
good or evil. Evil itself is not real--not in that it doesn’t exist, but in
that it has no substance. C.S. Lewis provides a wonderful picture of this in my
favorite book of his, The Great Divorce,
in which all of hell, as infinite as it seems to those in it, is no bigger than
an atom of the real world, of heaven itself, and the people who have chosen it
have turned into wisp-like ghosts, of no measurable size or solidity
whatsoever. The evil they have chosen is not real and they
themselves reflect that. (I posted a fantastic section from that book here. Feel free to go read it, if you’d
like.) The masks we cover our selves with, the personalities we take on, and
the false selves we live out of are substance-less.
“The more we get what
we now call ‘ourselves’ out of the way and let Him take us over, the more truly
ourselves we become. There is so much of Him that millions and millions of
‘little Christs,’ all different, will still be too few to express Him fully. He
made them all. He invented--as an author invents characters in a novel--all the
different men that you and I were intended to be. In that sense our real selves
are all waiting for us in Him. It is no good trying to ‘be myself’ without Him.
The more I resist Him and try to live on my own, the more I become dominated by
my own heredity and upbringing and surroundings and natural desires. In fact
what I so proudly call ‘Myself’ becomes merely the meeting place for trains of
events which I never started and which I cannot stop. What I call ‘My Wishes’
become merely the desires thrown up by my physical organism or pumped into me
by other men’s thoughts or even suggested to me by devils. Eggs and alcohol and
a good night’s sleep will be the real origins of what I flatter myself by
regarding as my own highly personal and discriminating decision to make love to
the girl opposite me in the railway carriage. Propaganda will be the real
origin of what I regard as my own personal political ideals. I am not, in my natural state, nearly so
much of a person as I like to believe: most of what I call ‘me’ can be very
easily explained. It is when I turn to
Christ, when I give myself up to His Personality, that I first begin to have a
personality of my own.
At the beginning I
said there were personalities in God. I will go further. There are no real
personalities anywhere else. Until you
have given up your self to Him you will not have a real self. How
monotonously alike all the great tyrants and conquerors have been: how
gloriously different are the saints.
Your new self (which
is Christ’s and also yours, and yours just because it is His) will not come as
long as you are looking for it. It will come as you are looking for Him. The
principle runs through all life from top to bottom. Give up yourself, and you
will find your real self. Lose your life and you will save it. Nothing that you
have not given away will ever be yours. Nothing in you that has not died will
ever be raised from the dead. Look for yourself, and you will find in the long
run only hatred, loneliness, despair, rage, ruin, and decay. But look for
Christ and you will find Him, and with Him everything else thrown in.”
(C.S. Lewis Mere Christianity)
“The fallen self
cannot know itself. As we have seen, we do not know who we are and will search
for our identity in someone or something other than God until we find ourselves
in Him. In the Presence, conversing with Him, we find that the ‘old man’--the
sinful, the neurotic, the sickly compulsive, the seedy old actor within--is not
the Real, but that these are simply
the false selves that can never be rooted in God. We find that God is the Real and that He calls the real ‘I’ forward,
separating us from our sicknesses and sins. We then no longer define our selves
by our sins, neuroses, and deprivations, but by Him whose healing life cleanses
and indwells us. From being bent toward the creature--the horizontal
position of the fall--we straighten up into the completing union with the
Creator--the vertical, listening position of the free creature. We find that we
are one in Him and that He is in us. Thus in the presence, listening to the
word the Spirit sends, spiritual and psychological healing takes place. Our
Lord sends a word--of joy, judgment, instruction, guidance. And that word, if
hidden away in an obedient heart, will work toward the integration of that
personality. As I listen and obey, I become” (Leanne Payne, The Broken
Image p. 135)
If my dad is not a composite of all the grievances I have
against him, who, then, is he? If God did not create him to be forever addicted
to cigarettes, what did He create him for? The very fact that I was now asking
these questions showed how far I had come along in relating to my dad and my
attitude towards him. Amazingly and wonderfully though, as I was beginning to
ask these questions for the first time I didn’t have to look too hard or too
creatively for the answers, because as I was asking them my dad was finally
breaking free for good of his own accord. As of now he hasn’t smoked in about two
years. And as I suspected all along, my real father, buried underneath most of
the time for so many years, is coming forth and I’ve enjoyed getting to know
him better. While I obviously don’t think that my change in heart is what
caused him to change, but I do believe that when forgiveness takes place (which
is a necessity if you want to see someone through Christ’s eyes, or rather is a
part of the process of seeing someone through Christ’s eyes) it creates a much
more conducive atmosphere for someone else to grow in, so I believe it helped.
At the very least it didn’t hurt him, and it helped me immensely, because
unforgiveness always holds the one who refuses to forgive in greater bondage
than it does the unforgiven person, though both are usually affected. Seeing
and forgiving my dad through Christ’s eyes turned out to be easier than I
thought it would be because he was actively working and growing with God as I
learned to forgive him, but it still freed me up from my own anger and
bitterness and frustration enough to begin to move on to the next wound in my life.
Rediscovering the second
wound
I didn’t immediately begin dealing with the next wound in my
life. In fact, it didn’t really surface from the depths of my heart until early
December, a few months later. Instead I began to dig deeper into understanding
the process of renewing the mind. In my post last summer I wrote of renewing
the mind as the only way growth and transformation is possible. It is the
bridge that connects who we are in Christ right now with who we appear to
ourselves and to the world around us to be right now. And while I believed then
and still believe now that to be true, it was something I had never thought of
before that summer, so I wanted to dive deeper into it. One of my mentors recommended
I read a book by Greg Boyd and Al Larson entitled Escaping the Matrix which I spent late October and most of November
digging into. It was fantastic!
October and November were also months of attempting many new
things, of pushing myself further in some things I had dabbled in some before,
and of generally learning how to apply in my life what I had learned over the
summer. I was growing in Christ and stepping into some of the responsibilities
of adulthood I had run from before. Life was good and I was learning how to do
something, to be someone with mine. All the growing I had been doing was
stretching me on the inside, but all that stretching also stirred up some deep
places inside me. It wasn’t long before another long-buried wound broke to the
surface again. For soon I would be 21.
2006 had been a very good year for me in many ways, but none
more so than in the way I had been able to break free from some social
ineptitudes and a general inability to connect with people and make good
friends that I had lived with for most of my teenage years. More specifically,
I had many friends throughout those years, but nobody I really trusted, nobody
I felt understood who I really was or cared enough to want to find out. Looking
back now, I can see many ways in which I isolated myself and didn’t let people
have an opportunity to get to know me well, but at the time I felt somewhat
abandoned and very frustrated. One result of this loneliness was my choice not
to have a real birthday party for several years in a row. But now, back in
2006, I had met some wonderful people, found some good friends through hard
work, and was going to have a party for my twenty-first birthday.
Without going into all the details, it was a wonderful
party. We did some fun things and we did some meaningful things. The whole
event was deeply symbolic for me. But the symbolism combined all the stretching
I had been going through, all that I had learned in the last year, and all of
the people (that could make it) that I had come to trust gathered together in
one place at one time, and those three things together touched a deep reservoir
of pain I had kept buried for a long time and had indeed almost forgotten
about.. I was fine until after everyone left, but then the pain of all the
loneliness of those years resurfaced. Many times when I desperately need to
seek God I will go for a walk in the woods (Theodore Wirth
Park) near my house. For
a period of my life, I would take a quiet time each morning and go out for a
wander through every little nook and path of the woods, usually staying out for
an hour or two; eventually I came to know every little trail by heart. And if I
needed to go for a walk at nighttime I would walk around the woods (I don’t live in the world’s safest neighborhood)
until I felt at peace in my heart. But that night I did something I had never
done before and will probably never do again: I went for a midnight walk through the woods. Over that walk and
through the next few days I came to two conclusions: One that this pain was
nothing new but rather something very old that I had been running from for a
long, long time, and two I finally had the resources, knowledge, friendships,
and courage to stop running and finally come face to face with the old pain and
learn to deal with it. So I set aside most of the activities I had been keeping
busy with and set out on what I termed a “healing journey.” A couple of weeks
into it, here is what I wrote on xanga about what I was going through:
“I am 21 now, have been for almost two weeks.
It feels pretty much the same as the end
of twenty did.
Same hopes.
Same struggles.
Same plans.
Same desires.
Same songs in my heart.
Same song playing on my site (time for a
change soon, I think).
Same unread books on my bookshelf.
Same books I've read countless times and have
recommended to others countless times.
Same long-neglected prayer closet in my room.
Same inspirational quotes on the door to my
long-neglected prayer closet.
Same never-ending battle to kill all the
box-elder bugs that creep their way into my room during winter.
Same tendency to make a mess of my room.
Same foods for breakfast and lunch.
Same old athletic trophies collecting dust.
Same old teddy bear keeping watch over my
room (now missing his right eye, in an apparent attempt to remind me of Matthew
5:29 (It's a long story--don't ask)).
Same job.
Same work schedule.
Same family patterns and struggles.
Same extra padding around my stomach.
Same wounds.
Same strongholds and fears formed to
protect those wounds.
New hope.
What? The truth is that although much of my life looks and even feels
the same right now, and I've painted a somber mood thus far in my post, I'm
actually in a very hopeful state of mind. Why? Because I am finally in a
position to deal with the fears and strongholds formed around some of the
deepest wounds I've carried around for years! The wounds I've never
really been able to tell any friends about because they indirectly came
from and were consistently reinforced by my friends...
Yes, I can finally see on my horizon
freedom from those wounds, and the glimpses I have been getting of
life beyond them contains more joy than anything I've experienced before.
More on this, including some thoughts on
strongholds, as I continue to work through all this.
To all my friends out there reading
this: Thank you for being so
instrumental in helping me reach this point where I feel safe enough with
you in bringing this wound to light so it can be healed. Major changes are
in the process inside me right now, if not the outside yet, and I'm going to
need you to make it through this.
Please don't abandon me. I can't do this
alone, though God knows I've tried to.
Jesus, help me. I'm so close...”
I initially planned to give myself from mid-December through
late January for this healing journey, but it would wind up lasting all the way
into May of 2007. What I learned would change my life…again.
Defining the heart and
mind
As a high school graduation gift in the summer of 2004 my
parents had sent me to a conference they had been to the previous year and was
highly recommended by our church, Leanne Payne’s annual conference. As a
prerequisite to going, I was supposed to read Leanne’s two main books: The Healing Presence and Restoring the Christian Soul. I tried to
read them but couldn’t understand half the terminology she was using, and it
was all way too complicated for me at the time as an 18 year old. Despite not
really understanding the books, I went anyway and had a wonderful time,
receiving some very valuable insights that made the whole trip worthwhile. I
also came away very impressed with the effectiveness of Leanne Payne’s teaching
even though I didn’t get all of it yet. Upon arriving home from the conference
I stashed away the books in my
“God-will-bring-me-back-to-this-when-the-time-is-right” portion of my
bookshelf.
After my midnight walk, God led me back to them and I began
to read through them again. As I did they still
didn’t make much sense, but some things were beginning to come together. Within
a few weeks of digging into her books I felt I had a solid grasp on what she was
talking about. More complicated than just understanding her terminology and use
of language, however, was integrating what I was learning from her books with
what I had learned over the summer and what I had just learned from Greg Boyd’s
book. Greg hardly even mentioned the heart, talking only of the mind in his
book, dealing with both the conscious and the unconscious minds. Leanne, on the
other hand, spoke of the spirit and soul and of “the two minds,” referring to
both the heart and the mind. Other authors and friends used the same terms but
in completely different ways. As you might guess, I was confused. If all
transformation is through renewing the mind, what role does the heart play? If
my spirit is united with Christ, is my soul as well? What exactly is the heart, anyway? If everybody
defines these terms differently, how do I determine which definition is
correct?
My first breakthrough came when a friend (I don’t remember
who, but whoever you are, thanks!) mentioned offhand in a conversation that the
Old Testament doesn’t have a word equivalent to the New Testament and modern
word “mind.” That the mind is something in and of itself is a thought that
originated with the Greeks, whose thought and language had permeated the
culture in which Jesus lived and taught, but the Jewish writers of the Old
Testament had no such concept of the mind as an individual thing and included it when they wrote of the
heart! For example, compare Luke 10:27 and Matthew 22:37 with Deuteronomy
6:5. Both quote from Deuteronomy 6:5 and both add the word mind to the quote. (It
also explained why my Pastor had kept going back to Proverbs 4:23 in a series
on renewing the mind--I couldn’t figure it out and at the time it drove me
nuts!) After going into a brief but fascinating overview of how we came to perceive
as separate the mind and the heart, thinking from being itself, Leanne Payne
speaks of how the Bible views the heart.
“From this brief
historical overview, we see why we speak of ‘head and heart’ the way we do. Our
language reflects at once the historical schism, as well as the attempt to
overcome it and explain the knowledge of faith and the
imaginative-intuitive-symbolic ways of knowing. But I want to make it clear
that such language is a concession, a necessary one in that it acknowledges
this historical ideology which has resulted in a psychological schism (between
thinking and being) within the souls of men and women everywhere. But it is
unfortunate terminology in that it too can seem to divide what should only be
differentiated, and can therefore mislead us into the opposite error of
undervaluing the discursive reason, its symbolic capacities, its power to
complement and balance the intuitive-feeling mind. It can and does lead to
differentiation in the ‘two minds’ that are inaccurate and therefore
misleading.
The Bible knows nothing of the schism we have suffered, so it does not
use the metaphor heart in this way.
‘In Biblical language,’ the heart is ‘the center of the human spirit, from
which springs emotions, thought, motivations, courage and action—the
“wellspring of life”’ (taken from the NIV Study Bible commentary on
Psalm 4:7) In the scriptures, therefore,
the heart of man refers to both
‘minds’---or as we say today, to ‘head knowledge’ as well as ‘heart knowledge.’
It also refers to both the spirit and soul in man. Therefore, rather than speaking of healing the head in contrast to the
heart, the ‘conscious’ in contrast to the ‘unconscious,’ or the spirit in
contrast to the soul, it speaks very simply of cleansing the heart. This
cleansing radically starts the transformation in every faculty, preparing the
total inner man for a transposition---an
infilling of God’s Spirit.
This means, of course,
just as in any number of cases in the English language, that we use a language
symbol in more than one way. When we say ‘head and heart,’ we acknowledge the
schism that is in man and has to be healed. But in terms of prayer for healing,
we hold firmly to the Scriptural metaphor which rightly speaks of man’s inner
being in this integrated way. We are then less likely to make the healing of
man more complicated and difficult than it is…
…So the Bible, while
acknowledging the differing faculties of the heart, does not speak of its ‘two
minds,’ but of one heart with two mindsets.” (The Healing Presence p.
161-162)
This new understanding led to another, bigger breakthrough:
Leanne Payne and Greg Boyd were, in effect, saying exactly the same thing, just
with very different language! I didn’t have to pit one against the other on whom
I should listen to; I could integrate them, I just needed a standard definition
to mold everyone else’s definitions to. Eventually I decided to go with Leanne
Payne’s definitions (which doesn’t make everybody else’s terms necessarily
wrong, like, for instance, Dallas Willard in his book Renovation of the Heart;
it just makes them different).
So what are the heart and mind, spirit and soul, anyway?
What roles do they play? And how does all this fit in with what I wrote last
summer about transformation solely via renewing the mind?
“The Scriptures
consider man as a whole, and we err if we fall into the trap of trying to
separate and define too closely the differences between the faculties of the
mind (e.g., the conscious and the unconscious), or where one leaves off and the
other begins. And the same is true of spirit and soul. Spirit and soul differ,
the faculties of the mind differ, but to try and differentiate them by
separating them is to do what the Scriptures do not do and what great Christian
minds such as St. Augustine (in regard to
spirit and soul) have failed to do.
Even so, all who
pastor souls effectively, from St. Paul to this present day,
have to deal with the essential makeup of man. To pray aright and to see
healing take place, we have to discern where the need is. We will do a person
no good and perhaps a lot of harm if we pray for his salvation (in effect, for
the healing of his spirit) when he has in fact already accepted Christ, and his
need is for emotional or physical healing. And we do live in a day when the
church is in great confusion over these matters. One part of the church
actually refuses to acknowledge the need for healing of the soul (as if full
sanctification necessarily occurs at the moment of new birth), while another
denies, for all practical purposes, even the need for the new birth (the
essential healing of man’s spirit). To go even further, few Christians can
discriminate between the psychological and the spiritual, and they think, like
the pagans of old, that the mind is the highest element in man. This is only
one more way of saying that we twentieth-century Christians have lost the
understanding of Incarnational Reality.” (Leanne Payne, Restoring The
Christian Soul p. 70-71)
“’In reference…to man’s psychical nature, ‘spirit’ denotes life as
having its origin in God and ‘soul’ denotes that same life as constituted in
man. Spirit is the inner depth of man’s being, the higher aspect of his
personality. Soul expresses man’s own special and distinctive individuality.
The pneuma (spirit) is man’s
non-material nature looking Godward; the psyche (soul) is that same nature of man looking earthward and touching the
things of sense.’ (H.D. McDonald,
Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, p. 678)
The Scriptures use the
terms interchangeably, though they differentiate between spirit and soul. To
speak of the soul is also to speak of the spirit in that the spirit of man
expresses itself through the soul. Conversely, of course, to speak of the
spirit is also to speak of the soul, for the two are wed in man’s makeup. We
know nothing of a human spirit in isolation from a soul, or a soul in isolation
from a spirit.
To speak of prayer for
the healing of the soul is, primarily, to speak of prayer for releasing someone
from psychological sickness and emotional pain due to hurts and deprivations of
the past. Prayer for healing of memories is in this category. When someone has
such a need, he has a psychological barrier to freedom in Christ. Though the
human spirit is united with Christ, God’s Spirit cannot ‘radiate’ through this
problem area until the person gets help to understand and deal with it. This is
where the gifts of counseling and healing come in, and people need to open up
in prayer to receive them. Until one does, he is being determined by the
difficulties of the past and lacks healing.” (Leanne Payne, Restoring the
Christian Soul p. 70)
As best I understand it now, I am a spirit, have a soul, and
live in a body. My spirit was crucified with Christ and raised to life with Him
and is now united with Him and has been ever since I repented and accepted His
salvation. This spirit is the “real me,” my true self and center, the “healed
place within” that Mario Bergner speaks of. My soul itself is something deeper
than just the sum of these, but it contains and speaks of my thoughts,
emotions, memories, beliefs, habits, attitudes, and so on and so forth; it
contains and stores all my life’s experiences. At the time of my conversion it
was not transformed, though in many
cases (like my dad’s) some things do change, but they are just a taste of the
results of the work that must lie ahead on the road to transformation. My flesh
is…well, let’s not go there now. I’ve still got a lot of questions about the
flesh and what it can and cannot do so we’ll save those for another time. Two
observations will suffice for now: Jesus came in the flesh, just as we all do,
yet He was without sin, so having flesh in and of itself does not make you
sinful. In Christ, my spirit is no longer bound by my flesh but has authority
over it.
My heart, a metaphor, as Leanne Payne notes above, speaks of
both my spirit and soul together,
hence the widely varying, at times seemingly contradictory descriptions of the
heart.
“The natural (fallen)
heart has lost the divine splendor. It is separated from God and from holy
converse. It ‘is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked,’ cries
Jeremiah (17:9). ‘Who can understand it?’ he asks. All the psychologies in the
world are attempts to know it.
God knows it: ‘I the
Lord search the heart and examine the mind” (Jeremiah 17:10). The Scriptures name many of the kinds of
hearts the Lord finds in His examination: broken, grieved, discouraged,
obstinate, proud, wicked, trembling, double, subtle, perverse, sorrowful,
fretting, heavy, unsearchable or unfathomable, cunning, despiteful (insolent,
arrogant, and boastful), bitter, stony, uncircumcised, overcharged, troubled,
foolish and darkened, jealous, envious, impenitent, evil, whorish, deceitful,
hard, scheming, diabolical, covetous, and so on.
These are hearts that are either sinful or wounded and need healing. In their healing, Jesus first of all comes
and stands in the midst of that heart. He who is the light of the world
illuminates it. He then speaks the healing word, one which, if received and
acted upon, sets the heart free from all the other dominating voices: those of
the world, the flesh, and the Devil.
This is a profound
view of man; it is incarnational. Christ is in us, radiating up through us,
granting to us the holy imagination, the holy intellect. Our two minds are thus
hallowed, as well as our sensory and feeling faculties, our wills, our
intuitive faculties, our bodies. As we listen to the One who completes us, we
find balance and harmony in all those areas. We find genuine integration of all
that we are. We are completed in Him. This
is by no means a simplistic view of healing if indeed we believe in the Real
Presence--within, without, forgiving and completing man.
We then have hearts such as these, also named in the Scriptures:
willing, perfect, tender, soft, pure, upright, clean, fixed, wise, merry, meek
and lowly, honest and good, single, true, compassionate, circumcised, thankful,
and so on. We have a tiny
foretaste of the divine splendor we shall once again know when, at the Marriage
supper of the Lamb, the union of God with His people will be finally and
perfectly consummated.” (Leanne
Payne, The Healing Presence p. 135-136)
How the mind works
One thing I need to point out is the journey I’ve gone on in
understanding the soul. Last summer’s post was all about the role of the spirit
in a believer. I also wrote that the only transformation necessary (and indeed
possible) was renewing the mind. While I don’t disagree with that now, I failed
then to define what the mind was and hadn’t really taken into account the
subconscious, or for that matter even really knew much of anything about the
subconscious. To quote Morpheus from the Matrix, I didn’t know “how deep the
rabbit hole goes,” and how deeply engrained are our lifetime of thought
patterns that need to be renewed. In retrospect, I wouldn’t change anything
about that post. It challenges me to remember who I am in Christ every time I
reread it. But I do want to share now what I didn’t know then after a year focused
on digging into the depths of my own soul and struggling to find ways to let
the truth of my Belovedness become infleshed in everything I think, say, and
do.
Amongst discovering all the other things that renewing the
mind speaks to, that the rabbit hole goes much deeper than just my conscious
thoughts to the very depths of my soul, it’s almost easy forget that it also
speaks of…renewing the mind! And if we’re going to renew the mind, it might be
helpful to understand how it works. It’s very difficult to fix something when
you don’t know how it’s supposed to work! I’ve spent some time this past year
gaining a better understanding of how the mind operates and the more I learn,
the more I want to learn. It’s quite fascinating. The book I read last November,
Escaping the Matrix, by Greg Boyd and
Al Larson, guided me on most of my journey through discovering the workings of
the mind. It contained the most modern scientific information available
(written in 2006) about the mind and how it works. What the mind does on a
second by second basis over the course of a lifetime is nothing short of
unbelievable.
“In all God’s creation
there is nothing as awesome and mysterious as the human brain. It weighs only
three and a half pounds, but this little organic computer can in most respects
outperform the largest and most sophisticated computers humans have been able
to construct.
Consider that one gram
of this gray matter (roughly the size of a pea) is more complex than the entire
global telephone system. The average adult brain consists of more than 10
billion neurons (National Geographic magazine, as I’ll quote in a little
bit, cites a number ten times bigger)
communicating with one another through more than ten trillion synaptic
connections. (Synaptic connections are the junctions or gaps between the axon
and the dendrite of a neuron. The biochemical neurotransmitters are released
from the axon to stimulate and communicate with the dendrite of a second
neuron.) As unbelievable as it sounds, the number of possible neuronal
connections in the brain is more than all of the stars in the known universe
(approximately 50 billion galaxies with an average of 100 billion stars each).
Although the average dendrite is a fraction of a millimeter in size, if you
were to line up all the dendrites in your brain, the line would circle the
globe five times!
The brain registers
particular experiences or produces particular thoughts by firing in certain
patterned ways with its billions of neurons connected by its trillions of
synapses. The magnitude of this complexity is beyond comprehension. Among other
things, we simply have trouble thinking in terms of trillions. Fortunately, the brain communicates much
faster than you can possibly count, and it operates along millions of neurological
pathways all at once. Were this not the case, it would take several lifetimes
to think a single thought!
The feats the brain is
capable of are even more amazing than its astounding complexity. At this very
moment your brain is accessing its memory files to identify each mark on this
page as a meaningful letter, each collection of letters as a meaningful word,
each collection of words as a meaningful sentence, each collection of sentences
as a meaningful paragraph, and so on. During this process, you’re being
impacted by an estimated 100 million bits of information per second. The
reticular activating system of your brain deletes 98 percent of this while the
rest of your brain filters the remaining 2 million bits of information. From
all this, your brain brings to your conscious awareness only the five to nine
pieces of information per second it believes is most relevant to you at the
moment.
For example, you
probably weren’t consciously aware of the weight of your buttocks pressing
against the chair on which you’re now sitting until we just now made that piece
of information relevant to you by having you read this sentence. That means
that the original five to nine pieces of information that you were consciously
attending to changed. You had to let go of one of the chunks of data in order
to consciously attend to the weight of your derriere against the chair, which
you are doing again right now. Though you only became conscious of your weight
on the chair when we mentioned it, your brain was already monitoring it at an
unconscious level.
We could have just as
easily turned your attention to your rate of breathing, to the sounds outside
your window, to various odors you may be smelling, to the beating of your
heart, or to the color of whatever occupies the upper left corner of your
peripheral vision at this moment. The brain is perpetually taking it all in,
processing it, and offering your conscious self a mere fraction of this
information. Every time you change your conscious focus, you alter the five to
nine pieces of information to which you are consciously attending.
As we said earlier,
every distinct aspect of your experience is a particular pattern of neurons
firing on one another--what is referred to as a neural-net. A neural-net is
activated in response to appropriate stimuli sometimes referred to as a
‘trigger.’ For example, you know what the word trigger means because your brain has been programmed to activate a distinct
neural-net that identifies these markings (t-r-i-g-g-e-r) as having a particular meaning. You’re
interpreting electrical signals.
Actually, it’s a bit
more complicated than that. What’s actually happening is that light is being
reflected off the markings on this page with a particular vibration. These
vibrations are stimulating your eye in a particular fashion that is sending a
pattern of electromagnetic activity into your nervous system and up to your
brain. This pattern of electromagnetic activity is triggering a distinct
neural-net that is being interpreted as having a specific meaning. And all of this is happening automatically,
according to a pre-established program (that is, your past learning) at a
minute fraction of a second.
So it has been for
every word you’ve read in this book thus far. And at every moment your brain
was at the same time deleting 100 million pieces of data. Without this
designated ability to delete the vast amount of superfluous information we
would not be able to function. (Escaping The Matrix p. 30-33)
To make sense of the present and prepare for the future, the
mind has to sort through the past to find patterns of information (neural-nets)
it has stored that are similar to the present patterns of information it is
currently receiving. In other words, it
is your memory, in all its different
forms, that enables you to live in the present.
“The whole point of our nervous system, from the sensory organs that
feed information to the massive glob of neurons that interpret it, is to
develop a sense of what is happening in the present and what is about to happen
in the future, so that we can respond in the best possible way. Our brains are fundamentally prediction
machines, and to work they have to find order in the chaos of possible
memories. Most of the things that pass through our brains don’t need to be remembered
any longer than they need to be thought about…If everything we looked at,
smelled, heard, or thought about was immediately filed away in the enormous
database that is our long-term memory, we’d be drowning in irrelevant
information.” (National Geographic, November 2007, p.51,54)
A couple of days before I was planning on writing this
section on how the mind works, a magazine we don’t get and I don’t normally
read appeared on our front couch downstairs. It was the most recent National Geographic and its cover story
was titled: Memory: Why we remember,
why we forget. Knowing my main focus was on how the mind works
specifically in regards to memories, I snatched it immediately and read through
it eagerly.
“What is a memory? The
best that neuroscientists can do for the moment is this: A memory is a stored
pattern of connections between neurons in the brain. There are about a hundred
billion of these neurons, each of which can make perhaps 5,000 to 10,000
synaptic connections with other neurons, which makes a total of about five
hundred trillion to a thousand trillion synapses in the average adult brain. By
comparison there are only about 32 trillion bytes of information in the entire
Library of Congress’s print collection. Every sensation we remember, every
thought we think, alters the connections within that vast network. Synapses are
strengthened or weakened or formed anew. Our physical substance changes.
Indeed, it is always changing, every moment, even as we sleep.” (National
Geographic, Nov. 2007 p. 36)
“Though there is
disagreement about just how many memory systems there are, scientists generally
divide memories into two types: declarative and nondeclarative (sometimes
referred to a explicit and implicit). Declarative memories are things you know
you remember, like the color of your car or what happened yesterday
afternoon…Nondeclarative memories are the things you know without thinking
about them, like how to ride a bike or how to draw a shape while looking at it
in a mirror.” (National Geographic, Nov. 2007 p. 41)
I have never had to relearn how to ride a bike; once was
enough. I will never have to relearn (barring injury, of some sort) how to
throw a baseball, say “pretzel,” make a snow angel, find my way home, drink a
glass of water, drain a three-pointer in Dylan’s face, sit quietly next to a
stream, swing on a swingset, walk or run in a straight line, flip a light
switch, calculate (simple) mathematics, how to turn a page while reading a
book, or how to read the words in that book if they are in English. My mind has
stored the neural-nets it associates with these activities and reactivates them
whenever it needs them, often without my having even to think about them
consciously.
“Once installed, these
neural-nets operate automatically and deterministically---remember, they’re
just organic transmitters of electromagnetic energy---and they do so faster
than your conscious mind can ordinarily grasp. For example, you did not have to
think about the meanings of the markings when they were triggered. The
neural-net that gives meaning to these particular markings operates on
autopilot, as it were. Once it is installed, these markings will continue to
deterministically and automatically activate the organic transmitters of
electromagnetic energy associated with them until the brain is reprogrammed to do otherwise.
This God-given,
deterministic, autopilot aspect of the brain is actually a wonderful gift, for
it allows us to process information quickly, efficiently, and accumulatively.
We don’t have to keep learning things over and over again. The brain neurologically stores conclusions it has reached and treats
these as reality until it is instructed to do otherwise. You instantly know the meaning of every
word you’re reading right now only because of this. This mind-boggling
efficiency and stability works to our advantage when our neurons have been
programmed to fire in ways that communicate truth and that are beneficial to
us.” (Boyd and Larson, Escaping The Matrix, p. 34-35)
This efficiency goes deeper than just mundane, every-day
activities. It also is true of much more complex systems and beliefs. For
example, when my mom tells me she loves me I believe her without much
thought--conscious thought, that is. Subconsciously (or nondeclaratively, as
National Geographic puts it) my mind has just ran through a hundred memories in
which she has proved she loves me through her actions and words, so my mind has
already concluded that she loves me and I believe her when she says so.
Sometimes the conclusions our mind makes stem from a single memory rather than
a multitude of them. Or maybe a single memory stands out from among a multitude
of them and you come to a conclusion based on that one memory, like the
conclusion I’ve come to that prayer is powerful. On that account, I won’t go
into details here but ask me sometime about my aunt Crystal (who was a witch, a
medium) and the details surrounding the end of her life. You won’t ever
convince me that God doesn’t answer prayers. That memory, as all memories do, comes attached to a meaning (and
sometimes an emotion), which is one
of the reasons I remember it in the first place.
Go back to how much information our minds process per
second: 100 million bits. Throw out 98% like our minds do automatically and
that still leaves you with 2 million bits of information per second of all
different varieties. Of all that information per second, even of the 5-9 bits
of conscious information per second, how does your mind decide what to and what
not to store long-term? How does it know when to retrieve it? The mind stores information it believes may
be useful to you in the future and retrieves it when it believes it may have
relevance to you in the present, or in a more neurological term, when it is
triggered.
Let’s dig a little deeper: How do our minds retrieve these
memories? What do they consist of? Why can they be so powerful at times? Greg Boyd
and Al Larson had a fascinating answer. I quote them at length here because
their answer has completely revolutionized the way I think of “renewing the
mind.”
“Stop now and answer this
simple question: what is in the backseat of your car? Please take the time to
do this exercise. The more time you take to understand these new concepts the
easier it will be to do the life-changing exercises later in the book! So
consciously observe; be a detective of your mind. What is in the backseat of
your car?
Got it? Now ask
yourself: how did I do that? Thought processes are behaviors you do. They don’t just happen. We want to help you
discover how you do the thought
process of remembering what is in the backseat of your car. How do you retrieve
this information? You might be inclined to answer, “I did a search and
activated neural-nets that store the sought-after information.” While
technically correct, that is not what
we’re asking. We’re asking, how did
you do the thought process of
remembering what is in the backseat of your car? We’re asking you to
investigate the outcome of what you experienced when you did this cognitive search. How do you know what is in the
backseat of your car so that you are able to answer the question ‘What is in
the backseat of your car?’
You didn’t see a
ticker-tape strip of conceptual information flowing across the screen of your
mind giving you the sought-after information, did you? As we’ve said, the brain
doesn’t think primarily with conceptual information. Rather, if you pay close
attention, you’ll notice that you reexperienced the backseat of your car. This is how the brain thinks. It replicates or re-presents (literally,
makes present again) experienced reality.
If you did ‘what’s in
the backseat of my car?’ as Al did, you instantly saw a visual picture of your
backseat. You saw it from the perspective of the front seat of your car. If you
did it as Greg did, you saw the backseat looking in through the passenger side
rear window. For Al the picture flashed for a fraction of a second. For Greg it
lasted a while during which he lifted up a coat to see what was under it. For
both of us the experience was in color, but Al’s re-presentation was a snapshot
while Greg’s was a video.
Others may have
investigated their backseat from the perspective of sitting in the backseat,
and it may have been in black and white. For others the visual may have been so
fast that you couldn’t clearly make out anything on your internal screen. Yet
you ‘just know’ what’s in the backseat. For still others, some sense other than
visual may have stood out when you did, ‘what’s in the backseat of my car?’ For
example, if you thought you smelled a rotting ham sandwich the last time you
were in your car, you may have instantly experienced an internal odor in
response to our question. If the last time you looked for something in your
backseat was in the darkness of an unlit garage, you may have internally
experienced what you felt at the time
in response to our question.
Whatever happened
inside of your brain in response to our question, this is how you did the memory of your backseat. We all do it
differently. But we all have this in common: we remembered by
reexperiencing. We re-present reality
when we think.
Let’s try another one.
Recite the Lord’s Prayer in your mind. (If you don’t know it, try the Pledge of
Allegiance.)
Okay, now say it to
yourself again, but as you do so, notice that you can hear each word of the
Lord’s Prayer (unless, of course, you are deaf, in which case you saw each word
signed). If you did it as Al did, you heard each distinct word in your own
voice. Indeed, you could locate the voice as coming from a space between your mouth
and nose. If you did it as Greg did, you heard each word in your own voice but
could not identify it coming from a specific location. Others may have heard
the words of the Lord’s Prayer in someone else’s voice---your pastor, mother,
or spouse. Some may have heard the voice from a specific location, like Al,
while others did not, like Greg. For some it was soft; for others it was loud.
Still others may have seen things in
their mind as they heard the prayer. Greg saw an ancient script of the prayer,
Al saw a re-presentation of God the Father as he said the prayer. Others may
have seen a church, a stained-glass window, a Bible, or something else they
associate with this prayer.
Again, what you
experienced in your mind when remembering the Lord’s Prayer was how you did this memory. We all did it somewhat
differently. But we all did it experientially.
The two main points
from these simple exercises is (1) that thought has a concrete, sensory,
experiential structure made up primarily of internal sights, sounds, and
feelings, and (2) we all do the structure of memory uniquely.
Let’s follow the white
rabbit down the hole a little deeper. This exercise will be a bit more
involved. The previous two exercises helped you discover how you do a memory.
This one will help you understand how you do an emotion.
We want you to do a pleasant memory. Take a moment and
mentally re-present an event from your past that you consider fun, happy, or
pleasant. It could be a vacation you went on, a time alone with a sweetheart, a
past achievement, etc. As soon as you finish reading this sentence, we’d like
you to stop reading and take time to get this pleasant memory vividly
reexperienced in mind.
Got it? Okay. Hold the
memory in mind and study it carefully. Notice how you are doing this behavior
called ‘remembering a pleasant event.’ You’re re-presenting the event to
yourself, as though it was presently real, aren’t you? You’re internally replaying the pleasant memory in ways
similar to how you initially recorded them. And notice that you’re employing
one or more of your five internal senses in your re-presentation of your past.
Some are seeing
pictures (visual) and/or hearing sounds (auditory). Some feel their bodies in
the re-presentation (kinesthetic) and/or are smelling odors (olfactory). And a
few may even be re-presenting something they tasted (gustatory). We shall refer
to the way we employ our internal senses in re-presenting thought as ‘the VAGOG
code’ (Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic, Olfactory, Gustatory).
No two people do a
pleasant memory exactly alike. In fact, if two people experienced exactly the
same pleasant event, their re-presentation of the memory would not be done in
exactly the same way. The pleasant feelings you have about this particular
memory are there because of the unique way you do this particular memory. What
you saw, hear, felt, smelled, and/or tasted (the VAGOG external) is transformed
into particular electromagnetic waves or a code you employ (the VAKOG internal)
in remembering the pleasantness of the event. Alter any of the specific
distinctions of how you do this memory---that is, change the way you internally
see, hear, feel, smell, or taste when you do this memory---and the feelings
that surround this memory will change….
…As we shall see more
clearly later on, our brains know how to do a memory---or any thought---in a
specific way that elicits the meaning and attached emotion for which it is
searching. If it is triggered to do ‘pleasant,’ it knows what to re-present and
how to re-present it to be congruent with that emotion. If it is externally
triggered to do ‘fear’ or ‘shame,’ our brains know ho to do that as well. In
fact, every single emotion you presently do has a unique VAKOG code; this is
the brain’s way of referencing one emotion as opposed to another emotion. If
you change any of the internal VAKOG codes distinctions, you will change the
emotion to some degree.
Why is all of this
important? Because while we don’t have the power to directly change our
emotions, we do have the ability to
change the re-presentations with which emotions are associated. We can’t change
fear, shame, jealousy, or any other emotion simply by willing it away. But we are able to permanently alter the
re-presentations to which these emotions are associated. When we become
detectives of our own minds and learn the specific ways our brains structure a
particular emotion (the VAKOG code it employs in the re-presentation that
includes the emotion), we will be able to choose to do it or not….
…Recognizing how we do
particular thoughts and particular emotions associated with these thoughts is
very important. Until we become aware of how we actually do our emotionally
laden thoughts, it will be difficult to gain control over them….
…We are more than our
neurons and have the power to take thoughts, and therefore emotions, captive to
Christ (2 Cor. 10:5; Rom.
12:2). But it’s very difficult to capture and renew something of which we’re
not aware. We can wish and pray and promise all we want. But so long as we keep
seeing, hearing, and sensing in our mind the virtual reality that is associated
with our emotion, the emotion will not change. Indeed, it cannot change, for the emotion is part of the same
neural-net we are seeing, hearing, and sensing.
More specifically, the
emotion is the meaning dimension of
what we are seeing, hearing, and sensing. The VAKOG code you elicit to do a
particular thought is what it is precisely because this code contains a
particular emotion….
…What all of this
demonstrates is that we don’t think primarily with conceptual information. We
think with concrete, sensory information. We think by replicating reality on
the inside. We quite literally re-present---make present again---our experience
of the world when we have a memory. More technically, we reactivate the same
network of neurons that were initially activated in our initial experience, to
some event experiencing the event all over again. The reexperience or
re-presentation will replicate the intensity of the original experience to the
degree that our inner re-presentation is like the original
experience---concrete, vivid, and with all our senses.
This isn’t just true
of memories. It’s how we generate our thoughts. We think by replicating sense experience on the inside. As authors
Lakoff and Johnson put it, all thought is ‘embodied.’ Even our most abstract
and general thoughts are metaphorically rooted in our concrete, physical
experience. Whenever we think, we in some way replicate aspects of our bodily
experience of the world. We think by turning our sense experience of the world
inward.
We didn’t need modern
cognitive philosophers or neuroscientists to tell us this. Almost everybody
throughout history who has paid much attention to how we think has seen this.
As far back as the fourth century BC, Plato described thought as an inner
artist painting pictures on the soul. His student Aristotle spoke of the mind
as a sort of soft wax upon which impressions are made with our senses. (Today
we know that the ‘wax’ consists of neurons.) He concluded that ‘the soul never
thinks without a mental image.’ With the exception of several decades of
misguided thinking in the twentieth century, this has been an almost
universally shared insight….
…Most of us haven’t
paid attention to Aristotle’s insight that ‘the soul never thinks without
images.’ Most people just assume they think with conceptual information---which
perhaps explains why we tend to trust conceptual information so much to
transform us, despite our uniform experience that this trust doesn’t usually pay
off. We just haven’t known there was anything else to go on. Why have we missed
this?
Think of it this way.
If we asked you to describe an elephant, you can only give us conceptual
information. You’d say something like, ‘a very large mammal with a long trunk.’
You’d give us our shared surface structure meaning, not your deep structure
meaning. But it’s not because you want to hide anything from us. It’s simply
that you can’t possibly give us your deep structure---that is, what you’re
actually experiencing when you do the
behavior of ‘thinking of an elephant.’
Only you can experience your actual mental behavior.
Only you can experience your
neural-nets from the inside. Only you
can see, hear, and sense what you do
in your mind. Only you have direct
access to your deep structure. To give others an answer, you have to provide an informational report of what you
experience. And you have to use the shared surface meaning of words to do it.
So you abstract conceptual information out from your internal experience to communicate to others. You give
interpretive information about your
thought because you simply can’t give the internal holographic experience that is your thought.
Because the
holographic virtual reality we experience in our minds occurs much faster than
our ordinary, conscious minds notice,” (elsewhere in the book Boyd and
Larson write that the unconscious mind operates hundreds of times faster than
the conscious mind does, explaining that “the frontal lobe region of the brain,
where most conscious thought occurs, operates much more slowly than the
amygdala, an almond-shaped area of the brain that receives signals of potential
perceived danger and sets off a series of reactions that will help protect the
person. Our fight-or-flight instinct kicks in before we even think about why we
need to fight or flee.”) “and because we
are so used to instantly producing this virtual reality under the right
triggers (asking a question, for example, triggers a search for meaning), we
usually assume that the information we give is the reality we experienced. We mistake the abstracted information for
the actual internal experience. In fact, because we rarely if ever need to
become conscious of our mental images in daily life, many people don’t even
know they have them. We think we ‘just know’ things. In reality, however, we
know things because we experience them inside. Or better, our real knowing is
an experience---a sensory experience in our minds.
Remember, your brain
only gives your conscious mind five to nine chunks of the 2 million pieces of
information it is processing each second in accordance with whatever it deems
relevant for a task it is performing. Our odd questions throughout this chapter
have (hopefully) been forcing your brain to make your mental images relevant to
your conscious mind. But in ordinary life our brains don’t deem this
information relevant, which is why it’s so easy to miss. It’s also a major
reason why we stay enslaved in the Matrix. We can consciously know a good deal
of true information while unconsciously experiencing lies. And experience
almost always trumps conceptual information.
If we are going to
take every thought captive to Christ, we’re going to have to do so according to
the rules that govern thought. And the rule is: thought is a form of
experience, and the more concrete and like reality the experience, the more
impact it has on you. (It might interest some readers to hear a brief (and
oversimplistic) neurological explanation for why conceptual information in and
of itself can’t transform us while experienced events can. To change the way we
think, feel, or respond to situations, the relevant network of neurons has to
be altered. This involves constructing new synaptic relationships with other
neural-nets. This in turn requires that the relevant neural-net as well as the
new neural-nets fire together…Simultaneous activation creates new synaptic
connections. Conceptual information about an event does not activate the relevant neural-nets, but emotion-laden
experiences do.) You can’t fight experiential cancer with a Band-Aid of
conceptual information. (Greg Boyd
and Al Larson, Escaping The Matrix p. 48-60)
Strongholds
Going back to mid-December, 2006, I had just learned all
about the mind what I’ve just shared, and I had just begun the process of
defining the Body, soul, spirit, and all the other terms people use to describe
the makeup of man. Another question arose in me, needing to be answered. (It
felt like I was going backwards at the time, finding more questions than answers!)
Something else needed to be defined before I could ever hope to deal with it
properly; I needed to find out what a wound truly was, because I knew I had
them.
As I should have guessed, the answers I found and the
definition I came up with only led me into some even deeper questions. Go
figure, right?
In terms of renewing the mind, a wound is commonly known as
a stronghold of the mind. I didn’t mention them in my post last summer mostly
because at the time I wasn’t facing too many of them, but I have been familiar
with the concept of strongholds ever since my pastor had preached a wonderful
sermon series on renewing the mind a few years back. (I’d love to share those
with you. They’re fantastic. So if you want them, just let me know and I’ll
find a way to get them to you.) Then in early 2006 I saw a very vivid
illustration of what a stronghold is. As some of you know, my mom was
hospitalized for six weeks in February and March of 2006 with a staph
infection. During the first week of her hospitalization she was very close to
dying and was placed in intensive care. The staph bacteria had gotten into her
bloodstream and was traveling all over her body. In certain spots it had
congregated into encrusted pustules, “pus sacks,” in essence. Her body was
being pumped full of all kinds of strong antibiotics but they couldn’t
penetrate these pus sacks. The bacteria had “circled the wagons” in these
certain spots, encrusting itself with the bacteria that the antibiotics had
killed, effectively preventing the antibiotics from reaching the living
bacteria inside and creating a protected breeding ground for the bacteria. Mom
had these all over the place, with one in her neck pressing on her spinal
chord, a few in her midsection, and a whole mess of them in her left thigh. Unless these pustules were completely
removed via surgery, even if we somehow were to erase every single strain of
the staph infection from every other part of her body, she would never be able
to remain healthy, because the infection would keep spreading from these
strongholds. As long as they remained she was in danger, so whenever the
doctors found one or some they always scheduled surgery as soon as they possibly could. Mom’s fine now, thank the Lord, but
the harrowing experience taught us all many lessons, and one of the impressions
I came away with was this vivid picture of strongholds.
Ed Silvoso, as quoted by my pastor in the series I referred
to above, defines a stronghold thusly: “A
mindset impregnated with hopelessness that causes one to accept as unchangeable
something that is absolutely contrary to God’s design and desire for you.”
The funny thing is that strongholds exist not because our
brains are in any way incapable or are fighting against us, but because our
brains are working incredibly well, and have been ever since the day we were
born. As I quoted before, “The brain
neurologically stores conclusions it has reached and treats these as reality
until it is instructed to do otherwise.” The good news is that when our
minds get good information about life, love, reality, truth, who God is, who we
are, and so on, they work wonderfully well. But the bad news is that when our
minds have been fed bad information about life, love, reality, truth, who God
is, who we are, and so on, they still work wonderfully well.
“But what if the coded
information that has been installed in our neurons is not true and is not
helpful? What if an installed neural-net contains meaning that is completely
out of sync with what God tells us is true? Now the remarkable efficiency of
our brains that God intended for our advantage works against us.
Think about this for a
minute or two. The brain processes
and installs falsehoods with the same efficiency and stability with which it
processes truth.
As automatically as
you understand the words you are reading right now, you will experience as real
something that is not real if an activated neural-net tells you so. And you will not notice it any more than
you noticed your brain retrieving the meaning of the words you are reading
right now. You will to this extent be in bondage to the efficiency of your
brain and be trapped in a deceptive virtual reality. Not only this, but to this
extent you will have been reduced to an automated, programmed, deterministic
extension of whoever installed these neural nets.
You are to this degree
imprisoned in the Matrix. You are to this degree a slave. For ‘people are
slaves to whatever masters them” (2 Peter 2:19).” (Boyd and Larson,
Escaping The Matrix p.35)
“To the extent that we do not choose to align our internal
re-presentations with the truth that is in Christ, our thoughts are chosen for
us. We allow ourselves to be defined by experiences of the past rather than
by our Creator. We enthrone as functional lord our alcoholic father, our frustrated
grandmother, our mischievous little brother, or any other person or event that
installed lies into our lives. To the extent that we do not take authority over
our thoughts, someone or something else does.” (Greg Boyd and Al Larson,
Escaping the Matrix p.119)
Neurologically speaking, a stronghold is nothing more than a
conclusion (or a set of conclusions) reached sometime in the past and
strengthened through continued application, all stored through combinations of
neural-nets.. The term is more commonly used in a negative sense, referring to
areas of our mind and life in which Satan has gained a foothold, but it can
also be used no less accurately in reference to those same areas under the rule and reign of God. A stronghold in and of itself isn’t a bad
thing at all; it’s very natural. The stronghold isn’t the problem: the lies it
contains are. But a stronghold built around and containing lies can leave a
person feeling very helpless against it.
It’s also important to note the general ineffectiveness of
information to tear down lie-encoded strongholds in our minds. Just like the
antibiotics couldn’t break through to the core of the pus sack, all the
information we throw at these strongholds has all the long-term effects of a
band-aid---effective with little cuts, but completely useless to stop major
bleeding. The information just doesn’t go deep enough.
“The crucial
difference between information and re-presentations is that information is
abstract while our imaginative re-presentations are concrete. This is why
memories can sometimes be so influential in a person’s life. We don’t
experience memories as information but as concrete, vivid re-presentations of
past events. For example, a young woman who was raped as a child doesn’t simply
remember that she was raped. Rather,
she re-experiences the rape when she
remembers it. In all likelihood from the perspective she had when it occurred.
(This can be explained neurologically. The same network of neurons that
recorded the event are reactivated in the memory of the event. From a
neurological perspective it is as though the event were happening all over
again. This is essentially how all memories operate, though the network of
neurons that contains the memory can in time be associated with other networks
of neurons and thus morphed in the process.) This vivid memory will continue to
shape this woman’s view of herself and the world precisely because it is
concrete and experiential, not abstract.” (Greg Boyd, Seeing Is Believing
p. 73)
How does a person who re-experiences a rape, even
subconsciously, every time she remembers it find healing? Is it even possible?
What about the guy? If he repents of his sin and turns to Christ but is still
wracked by guilt can he ever truly be free from that guilt? Should he be? Can
either of them ever taste joy and freedom, let alone live in it?
Wounds
I wrote earlier on that wounds are often equated with
strongholds, but one of the fascinating things I came to believe was that the
two are not the same, but rather two separate, individual parts of a whole.
Usually when people speak of either strongholds or wounds they speak of both
together, but it benefited me greatly to distinguish between the two. The wound
is the far more dangerous one. It is the still-in-pain, still dangerous,
infectious bacteria inside the pus sack. A stronghold is just your mind’s response to the unhealed wound. It is,
in a twisted way, your mind’s way of protecting
you from the wound’s message.
“It’s a classic
Catch-22. The devil convinces a person of a lie and then convinces him or her
of the need to hide the lie at all costs. When lies like this are installed, we
spend a significant portion of our lives trying not to be what we never were in the first place! (Greg Boyd and Al
Larson, Escaping The Matrix p. 62)
The stronghold is our mind’s attempt to hide the lie, or at
least to manage it. The wound is the lie we’ve been convinced of itself,
contained in a memory or memories which is one of the reasons it feels so true.
Even if we managed to somehow remove or deal with the stronghold and retrain
our mind but never dealt with the underlying wound that the stronghold sprang
up around, the wound, like Hydra, will just haunt us somewhere else in our
life. (We in my family are very familiar with this concept, with one example
being Dad’s many attempts to quit smoking. Whenever he would manage to stop
smoking for a while he would fill that void in his life with something else,
most commonly being either gardening, candy, or television. Dealing with the specific
stronghold of cigarettes didn’t solve the real problem, and without the real
wound dealt with he would sooner or later go back to nicotine. Throughout most
of my childhood I rarely ever saw my dad’s real self come forward. If not
hidden behind cigarettes, he would hide it behind something else.) Therefore it
is the wound to which we must attend to in order to find healing.
“Every man carries a
wound. I have never met a man without one. No matter how good your life may
have seemed to you, you live in a broken world full of broken people. Your
mother and father, no matter how wonderful, couldn’t have been perfect. She is
a daughter of Eve, and he a son of Adam. So there is no crossing through this
country without taking a wound. And every wound, whether it’s assaultive or
passive, carries with it a message.
The message feels final and true, absolutely true, because it is delivered with
such force. Our reaction to it shapes our personality in very significant ways.
From that flows the false self. Most of the men you know are living out of a
false self, a pose, which is directly related to this wound….
…The wound comes, and
with it a message. From that place the boy makes a vow, chooses a way of life
that gives rise to the false self. At the core of it all is a deep uncertainty.
The man doesn’t live from a center. So many men feel stuck---either paralyzed
and unable to move, or unable to stop moving.” (John Eldredge, Wild At
Heart p. 72,74-75)
If the analogy I most relate to strongholds is that of pus
sacks, the analogy I find most similar to wounds is that of ice, because one of
the key identifying marks of a wound is that it keeps you stuck. In the many
wounds I’ve uncovered and had to deal with in myself, they’ve all felt like
something that has been there a long, long time and plans on staying forever.
“’Hell,’ says Charles
Williams, ‘is an image that bears no more becoming.’ In Dante’s Inferno, Satan is set into a block of ice in the
bottom rung of Hell. That is the image Charles Williams had in mind when he
made this statement. Wentworth (William’s character) is now, like Satan, set in ice. For him there would be no more
becoming.” (Leanne Payne, The Healing Presence p. 85)
I am continually in the process of becoming. Like a tree, if
I’m not growing then I am dying. God’s plan for me is to keep growing in Him
and being transformed “till Christ be formed in you” (Galatians 4:19), and it’s
my personal belief that even in Heaven there will be a constant becoming we are
called to. But in every part of my soul and life where I have accepted the
message of the wound, the lie it contains, no more becoming is possible. That
part of my soul and my life is frozen as ice. The picture I get is of people
walking around, trying to live their normal lives and interact with the world
around them while much of their heart is frozen in the past, incapable of freely
interacting with the present.
“We experience a
traumatic event at some point in our lives and a part of us becomes frozen in
that event. The neural-net that encodes this event operates on an autopilot
whenever triggered. In a fraction of a second it re-presents the event in a
concrete, experiential fashion. And it does so from the perspective---and with
the emotional meaning---we had when we originally experienced the event. While
the rest of our self has moved on, this part of us did not. It
is frozen in time, as it were. It is autonomous.
For this reason,
whenever we encounter triggers that activate this neural-net, we do not respond
in ways that reflect our maturity level. Rather, when we are experiencing the
world from the perspective of this neural-net, we only have the resources that
were available to us when the neural-net was first installed. If the neural-net
was created when we were seven, we emotionally become a seven-year-old when it
is triggered. We thus respond with the maturity level of a seven-year-old.”
(Greg Boyd and Al Larson, Escaping The Matrix p. 162)
The lie is embedded as the meaning of a memory or series of
memories, all frozen in time. When the memories are triggered for whatever
reason, the lie they contain surfaces in them as well. Often enough the lie the
wound contains is something that we would consciously reject as a lie if it
ever reached the surface of our conscious mind. But they rarely surface, at
least not in an easily recognizable manner. The lie was twisted in place by
Satan, the father of lies (John 8:44). And as I wrote in the summer of ‘06 in
my post, every lie of Satan is ultimately about one of two things: who we are
and who God is. Often the lie is a mixture of both. Until we name and identify
the lie as a lie and take authority over it in Jesus name and replace it with
truth, it will still have power over us. And the more we agree with the lie the
more layers of ice get frozen around it (thus affecting more areas of our life
subconsciously in the process), the bigger the strongholds we build around it
to protect it become, and the more difficult it will be to deal with it later.
“In keeping silent
about evil, in burying it deep within us, so that it appears nowhere on the
surface, we are implanting it. And it will rise up a thousandfold in the
future.” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago)
What I’ve written thus far about wounds is all in effort to
describe what they are in our lives today:
lies we believe encased in strongholds of memories that we reexperience,
usually subconsciously, freezing us in our past and often leaving us feeling
hopeless in regards to their content and unable to taste the freedom Christ has
created us for. But to truly understand how to deal with wounds I’ve found it
very helpful to understand how they got there in the first place.
Let’s start at the beginning: We live in a broken world full
of wounded, rebellious, hurting people, and
hurting people hurt people. A world like that is dangerous. As John Eldredge says above, “there is no crossing
through this country without taking a wound.”
“The hole in creation
through which evil oozes, gurgles, and putrefies everything in its wicked path
is not a hole torn by an angry and distant God. It’s a hole ripped open by us:
‘But you were not willing.’ In the grip of our sin failure, it’s a hole torn by
you and me. Inch by inch, generation by generation, sin by sin, and rebellion
by rebellion---wider and wider the hole is torn open by a billion yous and a
billion mes across the expanse of time and humanity. Like a silent crawl of
consuming lava, like an avalanche roar, it grows and it grows, as does the
danger it presents. Ravenous and insatiable, it swallows and destroys
everything in its random and reckless path.
And may we make no
mistake; may there be no illusion. Sin takes no prisoners. Horror plays no
favorites. It doesn’t pick and choose who will be its next victim. It doesn’t
decide who deserves all and who deserves none. It just flows and flows. It
reeks and reeks. It feeds with gluttonous frenzy on anything and everything
near---you, me, the good people next door---vomiting disease, desolation, and
tragedy all the more.
Cancer strikes; drunkenness
flows. Dad has heart disease; Mom doesn’t hear like she used to. Two cars
collide; a family writhes in divorce. A gunshot splits a big-city night; a
child is stolen on a small-town day. An airplane hits a building; Jesus weeps
before His friend’s grave…
...People making
day-to-day choices in their day-to-day freedom to make their own choices. And
oh, what a terrible price is paid for that privilege---what tragedy, what pain
and loss, what brokenness.
It is a price born by
the chooser and, willfully or otherwise, imposed on everyone in the chooser’s
path. It’s imposed on every life and heart, every child and grownup, every
stranger and stranger’s family who just happens to be in the vicinity when the
horrific choice is made…
…All of it is the fallout,
the by-product, the putrid refuse of sin. It infiltrates, cripples, and rots
the very creation of which you and I are a part. It can never be said too often
or strongly enough: Not a pin-drop of it did He ever want to be!” (Jesus
Wept, Bruce Marchiano p.43-44,47)
“This is the verdict:
Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because
their deeds were evil.” (John 3:19)
“The fact of the
matter is that in this fallen world we are perpetually bombarded with messages
in the form of vivid experiences and images that contain lies. In principle,
every word spoken to us, every deed done to us, everything we’ve ever heard,
seen, or felt could under the right circumstances get locked in as a deceptive
message that will be vividly replicated under the right circumstances.
(Greg Boyd, Seeing Is Believing p.78)
In addition to that (as if that wasn’t enough…), we have an
enemy who hates us and wants to destroy us. (1 Peter 5:8) Our enemy, the father
of lies, is the one who takes these wounding events in life and twists a lie
into them and into us as deeply as he can.
“That’s what happens
in war---you get shot at. Have you forgotten? We were born into a world at war.
This scene we’re living in is no sitcom; it’s a bloody battle. Haven’t you
noticed with what deadly accuracy the wound was given? These blows you’ve
taken---they were not random accidents at all. They hit dead center…
…The wound is too well
aimed and far too consistent to be accidental. It was an attempt to take you
out; to cripple or destroy your strength and get you out of the action. The
wounds we’ve taken were leveled against us with stunning accuracy. Hopefully
you’re getting the picture. Do you know why there’s been such an assault? The
enemy fears you. You are dangerous big-time. If you ever really got your
strength back, lived from it with courage, you would be a huge problem to him.
You would do a lot of damage…on the side of good. Remember how valiant and
effective God has been in the history of the world? You are a stem of that
victorious stock.” (John Eldredge, Wild At Heart p. 86-87)
An event happens, maybe minor or maybe major, and you assign
a meaning to it in your soul. The event hurts, and you wonder what to do with
the pain. At that moment, just as you
decide what meaning an event has, you can choose to accept the lie a fallen
world and Satan would have you believe about that event (and he has many for
you to choose from), or you can choose to find God’s perspective on that event
and believe that, thereby assigning that
as the meaning of the event. It is your
choice. And you do have a choice! It is to that
moment of the wounds you have received that you must return and change the
decision you made then about what the wound meant if you wish to be free from the
power of that wound and that memory.
Remember the questions I started this post off with? “Did
Jesus ever have a wounded heart? If so, when and how? And if not, why not? And
if not, then why should we have them? If not, what was He doing that kept His heart
from being wounded? Can a heart that is hidden in Christ ever be wounded by the
stones of this world? If a heart has been broken by God can it still be wounded
by men?”
Here’s the answer I gave my friend at the time:
“A heart hidden in Christ cannot be wounded because it
responds exactly the same way as Christ’s heart does, and Christ’s heart cannot
be wounded by sin (unlike His physical body). Why Not? Because it is already broken by the exact same sin! A broken heart
and a wounded heart both got that way in response to the same thing: sin.
Can a heart be both wounded and broken by the same thing at the same time? I
don’t think so, but if you can think of an example to the contrary, let me
know.
If Christ’s heart cannot be wounded because it responds
instead by breaking, what does that tell us about the places in our hearts that
are wounded?”
I didn’t hear back from her and wondered why; finally I
decided to call her. She was hurt and angry with me and I learned an important
lesson: Never treat someone’s wounds lightly. I hadn’t meant to and didn’t
think I was, but she felt I was. She had received my last question as an
accusation saying that if she was wounded, then she wasn’t in the center of
God’s will. I, on the other hand, had meant it as exiting news that wounded
though our hearts may be, they didn’t
have to stay that way! Freedom from them was possible! If Christ’s heart
cannot be wounded because it responds instead by breaking, and my spirit is
united with His Spirit, then shouldn’t it be possible for me to learn how to
change my ways of responding to the wound to that of Christ’s, thereby being
set free from the power of the wound over my life? If the answer to the first
question is yes it is possible, then I think that’s incredibly good news. It
means, among other things, that actual, lasting transformation is truly
possible.
Learning how to be broken by sin rather than wounded by it
is, to me, the crux of everything I’ve learned about healing this past year,
and therefore everything I’ve written in this post. But first there is one more
huge topic I had to come to define and understand before I could truly begin to
step into the healing I so desperately needed, thereby also stepping into the
life God had created me for and called me to.
I had to deal with pain.
Pain
“’How much reverence
can you have for a Supreme Being who finds it necessary to include tooth decay
in His divine system of creation? Why in the world did He ever create pain?’
‘Pain?’ Lieutenant
Shiesskopf’s wife pounced on the word victoriously. Pain is a useful symptom.
Pain is a warning to us of bodily dangers.’
‘And who created the
dangers?’ Yossarian demanded. ‘Why couldn’t He have used a doorbell to notify
us, or one of His celestial choirs? Or a system of blue-and-red neon tubes
right in the middle of each person’s forehead?’
‘People would
certainly look silly walking around with red neon tubes in the middle of their
foreheads.’
‘They certainly look
beautiful now writhing in agony, don’t they?’” (Joseph Heller, as quoted in
In The Likeness Of God by Yancey and Brand p.461)
Why is changing our response to the wound so difficult? Why
is it so hard to go back and change the message of the memory from a lie to the
truth? Why have we built strongholds to protect it? I’ve come to believe the
answer is very simple: We don’t know how
to deal with pain properly.
In a dangerous world as this, pain is inevitable. If wounds
are inescapable in this world, then so is pain, because pain accompanies every
wound we receive. It is the pain we run from in our wounds, both when they were
received and now. It is because of pain that we freeze our wounds in time,
attempting to freeze the pain in time as well to free ourselves from it. And
when this fails and pain seeps back into our life from the edges of our frozen
wound, we often choose to freeze it again, thereby enlarging the wound and its
subconscious impact on our conscious lives. Eventually, if we continue to deal
with pain in this manner, we will no longer be able to hide it in our
subconscious and will have to try a new method. Repression, anger, depression,
addiction, passivity, and busyness are all common reactions to conscious pain.
There are many, many others, all with one thing in common: none of them work.
They may appear to be working for a while, years or decades, even, many people
even die while still running from their pain, but they don’t work, not even in
the least bit; the pain is still always there.
I am very cautious to write of pain, remembering how I hurt
my friend by glossing over this subject thoughtlessly. Obviously pain is a
sensitive subject with people. Pain is also something you can’t quite put a
measure on. I appreciate the way Henri Nouwen puts it:
“Our brokenness is
always lived and experienced as highly personal, intimate and unique. I am
deeply convinced that each human being suffers in a way that no other human
being suffers. No doubt, we can make comparisons; we can talk about more or
less suffering, but, in the final analysis, your pain and my pain are so deeply
personal that comparing them can bring scarcely any consolation or comfort. In
fact, I am more grateful for a person who can acknowledge that I am very alone
in my pain than for someone who tries to tell me that there are many others who
have a similar or worse pain.” (Henri Nouwen, Life Of The Beloved p.87-88)
My merely writing about
pain will not make any of yours go away, though it may help me to get it out.
And the moment I start to think it will, I’m in trouble. The same goes with all
words, whether written or spoken.
“Just
when you think
you
know how to soothe the world’s weeping,
your
words will taste like ash,
your
wisdom will turn an empty husk.”
(Phil Eaton, in Today 55
[September 1985])
But being silent doesn’t necessarily help either, though
listening does probably more than anything else does. But since I can’t listen
with my writing, and I truly have learned a lot about pain that has helped me face it with much less fear because I
understand it and its purpose better, I want to share some of that here.
So what is pain? Or rather, what is inner pain? Emotional,
spiritual, intellectual, or whatever-you-want-to-call-it pain? I’ve had a tough
time finding a definition anywhere, let alone a definition I like. Everything
I’ve heard seems to define inner pain as “pain that is inside,” which really
isn’t very helpful, because most people don’t define pain itself either. This
has left me to wonder if the entire concept of “inner pain” is simply a
metaphor or an analogy, taken from the world of physical pain, a way of
attempting to explain what’s going on inside by what’s going on outside. Why
might that be? Possibly, as my Pastor suggests in an old sermon, because all
the stuff that causes inner pain is stuff we
were never designed to deal with.
“Act two is the fall,
where hope is lost. Genesis Chapter two verses 16 and 17 says it this way: ‘And
the Lord God commanded the man saying ‘From any tree of the garden you may
freely eat, but from the tree of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil you
shall not eat, for in the day you eat of it you will surely die.’’ Don’t eat
that fruit. It looks good, but it’s poison fruit, and I am trying to spare you.
In Genesis 3 verse 4, however, Satan came and did what he does so well. He lied
and began to deceive. ‘You’re not gonna die.’ He said to Eve. ‘Surely you shall
not die.’ See, God’s holding out on you, Eve, Adam. By the way that’s one of
the lies he tells us now. He lies all the time. God’s holding out on you. For
God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened and God
doesn’t want your eyes to be opened. He likes the fact that you’re kind of in
the dark. And here’s the real deal about God---this is what’s underneath the
lie---He can’t be trusted; He isn’t good; He doesn’t have your best in mind. So
when He says to live a certain way or avoid a certain thing, don’t be paying
attention to Him. He can’t be trusted, He isn’t good, and He doesn’t care about
you. But if you pay attention to me, you will be enlightened, and you will have
your eyes opened.
And you know the
story. As the story goes: they listened to the liar, they were deceived by the
deceiver, so they did what He said and when they did guess what, their eyes
were opened. So in some sense the liar, the deceiver was telling them the
truth, but what they saw was not life, and what they saw was not glory, and
what they saw that they had never seen before---in fact, they were not wired,
they were not created by God to know how to handle what they were about to see---what
they finally did see when they disobeyed God, they saw for the first time: sin.
And they saw for the first time: death. And
they were never created for that; they had no way of handling that. That’s
what they saw. And after they saw sin and death what they felt was
naked---never felt that before. And what they felt in addition to that was
ashamed, they had never felt that before. In addition to that they felt guilty.
In addition to that they felt despair. They had never felt despair, only hope.
But that was gone.
What they did as a result of their despair, and their shame, and their
guilt was they did what you and I do, ‘cause we’ve been doing it ever since: they
hid. First of all they hid from God, and then they began to learn how to hide
from each other with masks and manipulations and power games. Before you know
it they were even able to hide from themselves, coming to a point where they
didn’t even know who they were.
Never before had a despairing thought ever entered their mind, but now they
would never be free from despairing thoughts. They would spend their entire
lives trying to find ways to relieve themselves of despairing thoughts, and no
daughter or son of Adam and Eve would ever be able to fix it….They were
designed to be able to bring this world into its full potential, but now it’s
broken and if there’s anything clear to them now: they can’t fix it.” (Dave
Johnson, 04/20/03 Celebrating Kingdom Hope)
When God created man he gave him a wonderful physical body
with a nervous system intricately designed to protect man and enable him to
enjoy and interact with the world around him. As a part of that system, He
designed our bodies with marvelous healing abilities based on the dangers and
challenges we would face in the course of interacting with the world around us.
But we were never designed to have to face dangers to the soul. That was never
part of God’s plan and purpose for us. Now that we do face them, we’ve learned
how to cope with them in many ways,
but we have no way to heal them. At
least, not until we receive a recreated spirit from God at the cross.
With all that said, almost everything I’ve learned about
pain and what it is and therefore how to deal with has come from learning about
physical pain, what it does and how
to deal with it. Of all the books I’ve read on pain, none have helped me more
than three books co-written by Phillip Yancey and Paul Brand, so it’s from them
I will be sharing here. Many of you know who Phillip Yancey is, so I won’t
describe who he is to you, but few people have ever heard of Paul Brand, and
the books are written from his perspective. Brand was a world-renowned hand
surgeon and an expert on leprosy, a recipient of many coveted medical awards
and honors. It was his work and research on leprosy that has transformed worldwide
countless beliefs and prejudices about leprosy, as well as the medical
treatments and mindset around it. The books he co-wrote with Yancey are
fantastic; I highly recommend them to anybody.
What is pain?
“At its most basic level pain serves as a signal that something is
wrong, like a smoke alarm that
goes off with a loud noise whenever the danger of fire reaches a certain
level.…Besides this warning aspect, pain offers a related contribution that
often gets overlooked: it unifies the body…A body only possesses unity to the
degree that it possesses pain. An infected toenail proves to me that the toe is
important; it is mine; it needs attention. Hair---yes, that matters, but we see
it as a decoration. It can be bleached, shaped, ironed, and even cut off
without pain. But what is indispensably mine is defined by pain.” (Paul
Brand and Phillip Yancey, In The Likeness Of God p.475)
“If one part suffers,
every part suffers with it.” (1 Cor. 12:26)
Pain, I’ve come to
believe, is a wonderful thing! Though we commonly despise, dread, or fear
it, still it faithfully protects us day and night from dangers known and
unknown. The story of how Paul Brand came to appreciate God’s gift of pain to
us is a wonderful one, and it involved becoming deeply involved with people who
experience exactly what many of us wish for---a world without pain. We call many of those type of people by another, more
commonly known name: lepers. Far from being a wonderful world, their painless
world is terrifying and extremely destructive. To illustrate this, here’s a
very graphic true story that you may want to skip over if you’re
squeamish---I’ll alert you when the squeamish parts are over---but it portrays
very vividly what a world without pain is like, as is a reality for somebody with
leprosy.
“Tanya was a
four-year-old patient with dark flashing eyes, curly hair, and an impish smile.
I examined her at the national leprosy hospital in Carville, Louisiana,
where her mother had brought her for a diagnosis. A cloud of tension hung in
the air between the little girl and her mother, but I noticed Tanya seemed
eerily unafraid. She sat on the edge of the padded table and watched
impassively as I began to remove blood-soiled bandages from her feet.
Testing her swollen
left ankle, I found that the foot rotated freely, the sign of a fully
dislocated ankle. I winced at the unnatural movement, but Tanya did not. I
resumed unwrapping the bandages. ‘Are you sure you want these sores healed,
young lady?’ I said, trying to lighten the atmosphere in the room. ‘You might
have to start wearing shoes again.’ Tanya laughed, and I thought it odd that
she did not flinch or whimper as I removed the dressings next to her skin. She
looked around the room with an expression of faint boredom.
When I unwrapped the
last bandage, I found grossly infected ulcers on the soles of both feet. Ever
so gently I probed the wounds, glancing at Tanya’s face for some reaction. She
showed none. The probe pushed easily through soft, necrotic tissue, and I could
even the white gleam of bare bone. Still no reaction from Tanya.
As I puzzled over the
girl’s injuries, her mother told me Tanya’s story. ‘She seemed fine as an
infant. A little high-spirited maybe, but perfectly normal. I’ll never forget
the first time I realized she had a serious problem. Tanya was seventeen or
eighteen months old. Usually I kept her in the same room with me, but that day
I left her alone in her playpen while I went to answer the phone. She stayed
quiet, and so I decided to begin dinner. For a change she was playing happily
by herself. I could hear her laughing and cooing. I smiled to myself, wondering
what new mischief she had gotten into.
‘A few minutes later I
went into Tanya’s room and found her sitting on the floor of her playpen,
fingerpainting red swirls on the white plastic sheet. I didn’t grasp the
situation at first, but when I got closer I screamed. It was horrible. The tip
of Tanya’s finger was mangled and bleeding, and it was her own blood she was
using to make those designs on the sheets.
‘I yelled, ‘Tanya,
what happened!’ She grinned at me, and that’s when I saw the streaks of blood
on her teeth. She had bitten off the teeth of her finger and was playing in the
blood.’
Over the next few
months, Tanya’s mother told me, she and her husband tried in vain to convince
their daughter that fingers must not be bitten. The toddler laughed at
spankings and other physical threats, and indeed seemed immune to all
punishment. To get her way she merely had to lift a finger to her teeth and
pretend to bite, and her parents capitulated at once. The parents’ horror
turned to despair as wounds mysteriously appeared on one of Tanya’s fingers
after another.
Tanya’s mother
recounted this story in a flat, unemotional voice, as if she had resigned
herself to the perverse plight of rearing a child with no instincts of
self-preservation. To complicate matters, she was now a single mother: after a
year of trying to cope with Tanya, her husband had deserted the family. ‘If you
insist on keeping Tanya at home, then I quit,’ he had announced. ‘We’ve
begotten a monster.’
Tanya certainly didn’t
look like a monster. Apart from the sores on her feet and her shortened fingers
she looked like a healthy four-year-old child. I asked about the foot injuries.
‘They began as soon as she learned how to walk,’ her mother replied. ‘She’d
step on a nail or thumbtack and not bother to pull it out. Now I check her feet
at the end of every day, and often I discover a new wound or open sore. If she
twists an ankle, she doesn’t limp. And so it twists again and again. An
orthopedic specialist told me she’s permanently damaged the joint. If we wrap
her feet for protection, sometimes in a fit of anger she’ll tear off the
bandages. Once she ripped open a plaster cast with her bare fingers.’
Tanya’s mother had
come to me on the orthopedists recommendation. ‘I’ve heard your leprosy
patients have foot problems like this,’ she said. ‘Does my daughter have
leprosy? Can you heal her hands and feet?’ She wore the helpless, plaintive
expression I had often seen on the parents of young patients, the expression
that tugs at a doctor’s heart. I sat down and gently tried to explain Tanya’s
condition.
Alas, I could offer
little hope or comfort. I would do further tests, but it seemed apparent that
Tanya suffered from a rare genetic defect known informally as ‘congenital
indifference to pain.’ She was healthy in every respect but one: she did not
feel pain. Nerves in her hands and feet transmitted messages about changes in
pressure or temperature---she felt a kind of tingling when she burned herself
or bit a finger---but these carried no hint of unpleasantness. Tanya lacked any
mental construct of pain. She rather enjoyed the tingling sensations,
especially when they produced such dramatic reactions in others.
‘We can get these
wounds healed,’ I said, ‘but Tanya has no built-in warning system to defend her
from further injury. Nothing will improve until Tanya understands the problem
and consciously begins to protect herself.’
Seven years later, I
received a telephone call from Tanya’s mother in St. Louis. Tanya, now eleven, was living a
pathetic existence in an institution. She had lost both legs to amputation: she
had refused to wear proper shoes and that, coupled with her failure to limp or
to shift weight when standing (because she felt no discomfort), had eventually
put intolerable pressure on her joints. Tanya had also lost most of her
fingers. Her elbows were constantly dislocated. She suffered the effects of
chronic sepsis from ulcers on her hands and amputation stumps. Her tongue was
lacerated and badly scarred from her nervous habit of chewing it.
A monster, her father
had called her. Tanya was no monster, only an extreme example---a human
metaphor, really---of life without pain.
Tanya’s particular problem
occurs rarely, but such conditions as leprosy, diabetes, alcoholism, multiple
sclerosis, nerve disorders, and spinal cord injury can also bring about the
strangely hazardous state of insensitivity to pain. Ironically, while most of
us seek out pharmacists and doctors in search of relief from pain, these people
live in constant peril due to pain’s absence.
I first learned about
painlessness while working with leprosy, a disease that inflicts more than 12
million people worldwide. Leprosy has long provoked a fear bordering on
hysteria, mainly because of the horrible disfigurement that may result if it
goes untreated. The noses of leprosy patients shrink away, their earlobes
swell, and over time they lose fingers and toes, then hands and feet. Many also
go blind.
After working for a
while with patients in India,
I began to question the medical presumption that leprosy caused this
disfigurement directly. Did patients’ flesh simply rot away? Or might their
problems, like Tanya’s, trace back to the underlying cause of sensitivity of
pain? Perhaps leprosy patients were destroying themselves unwittingly for the
simple reason that they too lacked a system to warn them of danger. Still
researching this theory, I visited a large leprosy hospital in New Guinea
where I observed two grim scenes that have stayed with me ever since.
A woman in a village
near the leprosarium was roasting yams over a charcoal brazier. She pierced one
yam with a sharp stick and held it over the fire, slowly twirling the stick
between her fingers like a barbecue spit. The yam fell off the stick, however,
and I watched as she unsuccessfully tried to spear it, each jab driving the yam
farther underneath the red hot coals. Finally, she shrugged and looked over to
an old man squatting a few feet away. At her gesture, obviously knowing what
was expected of him, he shambled over to the fire, reached in, pushed aside the
hot coals to retrieve the yam, and returned to his seat.
As a surgeon
specializing in human hands, I was appalled. Everything had happened too fast
for me to intervene, but I went immediately to examine the old man’s hands. He
had no finger’s left, only gnarled stubs covered with leaking blisters and the
scars of old wounds. Clearly, this was not the first time he had stuck his hand
into a fire. I lectured him on the need to care for his hands, but his
apathetic response gave me little confidence that he had listened.
A few days later I
conducted a group clinic at the neighborhood leprosarium. My visit had been
announced in advance, and at the scheduled time the administrators rang a loud
bell to summon patients. I stood with other staff in an open courtyard, and as
soon as the bell rang a crowd of people emerged from the individual huts and
barrackslike wards and began to move toward us. An eager young patient
caught my eye as he struggled across the edge of the courtyard on crutches,
holding his bandaged left leg clear off the ground. Although he did his awkward
best to hurry, the nimbler patients soon overtook him. As I watched, this man
tucked his crutches under his arm and began to run on both feet with a very
lopsided gait, waving wildly to get our attention. He ended up near the head of
the line, where he stood panting, leaning on his crutches, wearing a smile of
triumph.
I could tell from the
man’s gait, though, that something was badly wrong. Walking toward him, I saw
that the bandages were wet with blood and his left foot flopped freely from
side to side. By running on an already dislocated ankle, he had put far too much
force on the end of his leg bone, and the skin had broken under the stress. He
was walking on the end of his tibia, and with every step that naked bone dug
into the ground. Nurses scolded the man sharply, but he seemed quite proud of
himself for having run so fast. I knelt beside him and found that small stones
and twigs had jammed through the end of the bone into the marrow cavity. I had
no choice but to amputate the leg below the knee.
Those two scenes long
haunted me. Closing my eyes, I can still see the two facial expressions: the
weary indifference of the old man who plucked the yam from the fire, the
ebullient joy of the young man who ran across the courtyard. One eventually
lost his hand, the other his leg; they had in common an utter nonchalance toward
self-destruction” Paul Brand and Phillip Yancey, The Gift Nobody Wants p.
3-7)
*****END SQUEAMISH PART*****
“For the painless, danger lurks everywhere. A larynx that never
feels a tickle does not trigger the cough reflex that relocates phlegm from the
lungs to the pharynx, and a person who never coughs runs the risk of developing
pneumonia. The bone joints of insensitive people deteriorate because there are
no whispers of pain encouraging a shift in position, and soon bone grinds
against bone. Strep throat, appendicitis, heart attack, stroke---the body has
no way to announce these threats to the painless person. Often the attending
physician gets the first clue to the cause of death at the time of autopsy.”
(Paul Brand and Phillip Yancey, The Gift Nobody Wants p. 185-186)
“Tanya, James, and
others like them dramatically reinforced what we had already learned from
leprosy patients: pain is not the enemy,
but the loyal scout announcing the enemy. And yet---here is the central
paradox of my life---after spending a lifetime among people who destroy
themselves for lack of pain, I still find it difficult to communicate an
appreciation for pain to people who have no such defect. Pain truly is the gift
nobody wants. I can think of nothing more precious for those who suffer from
congenital painlessness, leprosy, diabetes, and other nerve disorders. But
people who already own this gift rarely value it. Usually, they resist it.
My esteem for pain
runs so counter to the common attitude that I sometimes feel like a subversive,
especially in modern Western countries. On my travels I have observed an ironic
law of reversal at work: as a society gains the ability to limit suffering, it
loses the ability to cope with what suffering remains. (It is the philosophers,
theologians, and writers of the affluent West, not the Third
World, who worry obsessively about ‘the problem of pain,’ and
point an accusing finger at God.)…In the
modern view, pain is an enemy, a sinister invader that must be expelled. And
if Product X removes pain thirty seconds faster, all the better. This approach has a crucial, dangerous
flaw: once regarded as an enemy, not a warning signal, pain loses its power to
instruct. Silencing pain without considering its message is like disconnecting
a ringing fire alarm to avoid receiving bad news.” (Paul Brand and
Phillip Yancey, The Gift Nobody Wants p.187-188)
Pain, as Brand
and Yancey note elsewhere, is directional.
It hurts for a purpose, and its goal is not to hurt but to warn. But as
Tanya’s and millions of other similar stories warn us, without the hurt the
warning will not often be heeded. And without heeding the warning we open
ourselves up to dangers most people take for granted they are protected from.
For example, even walking a few miles on perfectly healthy feet can leave a
leper with an ugly ulcer on his foot by the end of the walk. How could that be?
Because, unbeknownst to most of us, our body monitors our stride and
distributes the stress evenly amongst the foot throughout the trip by adjusting
the stride as needed, and this almost always
takes place subconsciously. A leper has no such protection, and will not
adjust his stride to distribute the stress, so the same parts of the foot will
take in all the pressure of every step of those few miles, swelling,
blistering, and eventually bursting into ulcers in response to the unrelenting
pounding. That leper may be perfectly healthy in every manner but the ability
to feel pain, but by the end of that walk---that you or I could undertake
easily and without fear---his foot will be wounded. He may even find a nail or
something stuck in his foot when he takes his shoes off.
Trying to find a solution for such dangers, in the early
1970’s, Paul Brand applied for a grant to create “a practical substitute for pain”
from the American government. Upon receiving it, he and his colleagues set to
work to recreate the nervous system, or at least its pain-warning system for
those who lacked an effective one. It proved to be an utterly impossible task,
and more than a million dollars later they gave up.
“I learned a
fundamental distinction: a person who never feels pain is task-oriented,
whereas a person who has an intact pain system is self-oriented. The painless
person may know by a signal that a certain action is harmful, but if he really
wants to, he does it anyway. The pain-sensitive person, no matter how much he
wants to do something, will stop for pain, because deep in his psyche he knows
that preserving his own self is more significant than anything he might want to
do….I never fulfilled my dream of ‘a practical substitute for pain,’ but the
process did at last set to rest the two questions that had long haunted me. Why
must pain be unpleasant? Why must pain persist? Our system failed for the
precise reason that we could not effectively reproduce those two qualities of
pain. The mysterious power of the human brain can force a person to
STOP!---something I could never accomplish with my substitute systems. And
‘natural’ pain will persist as long as danger threatens, whether we want it to
or not; unlike my substitute system, it cannot be switched off.
As I worked on the
substitute system, I sometimes thought of my rheumatoid arthritis patients who
yearned for just the sort of on-off switch we were installing. If rheumatoid
patients had a switch or wire they could disconnect, most would destroy their
hands in days or weeks. How fortunate, I thought, that for most of us the pain
switch will always remain out of reach.” (Paul Brand and Phillip Yancey,
The Gift Nobody Wants p.195-196)
“Human beings have an
efficient reflex system that forcibly withdraws a hand from a sharp or hot
object even before nerve messages reach the brain. Why, then, must pain include
the toxin the unpleasantness? My
‘substitute pain’ project answered the question on one level: pain supplies the
compulsion to respond to warnings of danger. But could not such warnings be
handled as a reflex, without involving the conscious brain? In other words, why
does there need to be a third stage of pain at all?
Nobel Laureate Sir
John Eccles worried over this issue, and even performed experiments on
decerebrated animals to see how they would respond to pain. He found that a
brainless frog still pulls its foot from an acid solution and a decerebrated
dog still scratches flea bites. After much study Eccles concluded that,
although the reflex system does provide a layer of protection, the higher brain
becomes involved for two reasons.
First, the hurt of
pain forces the entire being to attend to the danger. Once aware of the cut on
my finger, I forget all about my crowded schedule and the long line of patients
available---I run for a bandage. Pain ignores, even mocks all other priorities.
It astounds me that a
coded bit of datum in the brain can induce such a feeling of compulsion. The
tiniest object---a hair down the trachea, a speck in the eye---can commandeer
the whole of a human being’s consciousness. A distinguished poet who has just
received a literary reward returns to her seat, bows demurely to acknowledge the
applause, gracefully arranges her skirt, bends to sit, and then gracelessly
shoots up with a howl. She has landed on a jagged edge of the chair and her
brain, flouting all decorum, attends solely to the distress signals emanating
from the lowly lamina of her bottom. An operatic tenor whose career depends
upon critical reception of this evening’s performance runs from the stage for a
glass of water to calm the tickle in his throat. A basketball player writhes on
the floor in front of a television audience of 20 million; the pain system
cares not at all about the trivia of decorum and shame. By indulging the higher
brain so prominently, the response of self-protection overwhelms all others.
The second advantage
of higher brain involvement, Eccles said, is that unpleasantness sears into
memory, thus protecting us in the future. When I burn myself handling a hot
pot, I determine from then on to use a glove or a hot pad. The very unpleasantness of pain---the part we detest---makes it
effective across time.
Pain is unique among
sensations. Other senses tend to habituate, or lessen over time: the strongest
cheeses seem virtually odorless after eight minutes; touch sensors adjust
quickly to coarse clothing; an absent-minded professor searches in vain for his
glasses, no longer feeling their weight on his head. In contrast, pain sensors
do not habituate, but report incessantly to the conscious brain as long as
danger remains. A bullet penetrates for a second and exits; the resulting pain
may linger a year or more.
Oddly, though, this
sensation that eclipses all others is hardest to remember once it fades. How
many women have sworn after a difficult childbirth, ‘Never again will I go
through that’? How many receive the news of another pregnancy with joy? I can
close my eyes and summon up a constellation of scenes and faces from the past.
Through sheer mental effort I can nearly replicate the smell of an Indian
village or the taste of chicken curry. I can mentally replay familiar motifs
from hymns, symphonies, and popular songs. But only weakly can I recall
excruciating pain. Gallbladder attacks, agony from a ruptured disc, an airplane
crash---my memories come to me stripped of the unpleasantness.
All these characteristics of pain serve its ultimate end: to galvanize the
entire body. Pain shrinks time to the present moment. There is no need for the
sensation to linger once the danger has passed; and it dare not habituate while
danger remains. What matters to the pain system is that you feel miserable
enough to stop whatever you’re doing and pay attention right now.
In the words of Elaine
Scarry, pain ‘unmakes a person’s world.’ Try carrying on a conversation with a
woman in the final stages of childbirth, she suggests. Pain can overrule the
values we cherish most, a fact which torturers know all too well: they use
physical pain to wrench from a person information which a moment before he had
held precious and even sacred. Few can
transcend the urgency of pain---and that is its intent, precisely.”
(Paul Brand and Phillip Yancey, The Gift Nobody Wants p.216-217)
Going back to inner pain, if the goal of physical pain is to
get my attention so I can protect myself, doing whatever it deems necessary to
be successful at that, what might that mean for the inner pain I’ve been running
from for years?
“People who view pain
as the enemy, I have noted, instinctively respond with vengeance or
bitterness---Why me? I don’t deserve this! It’s not fair! ---which has the vicious-circle effect of
making their pain even worse. ‘Think of
pain as a speech you body is delivering to you about a subject of vital
importance to you,’ I tell my patients. ‘From the very first twinge, pause
and listen to the pain and, yes, try to be grateful. The body is using the language of pain because that’s the most
effective way to get your attention.’ I call this approach ‘befriending
pain’: to take what is ordinarily seen as an enemy and to disarm and then
welcome it.” (Paul Brand and Phillip Yancey, The Gift Nobody Wants p.222)
I’ll leave you to draw what correlations you see fit between
physical pain and inner pain, but I’ve come to believe they are more alike than
they are different . For myself, I’ve
come to appreciate pain more than I ever had before. Just like I discovered a
stronghold itself (not the wound or the lie) to be, pain itself is a natural,
very wonderful thing. That’s not saying I want
to feel pain, but that when I do, rather than fearing and running from it or
hiding and burying it, I stop and listen to what it is saying to me, what
message it has for me. I am learning to
befriend pain.
“The first response,
then, to our brokenness is to face it squarely and befriend it. This may seem
quite unnatural. Our first, most spontaneous response to pain and suffering is
to avoid it, to keep it at arms length; to ignore, circumvent, or deny it.
Suffering---be it physical, mental, or emotional---is almost always experienced
as an unwelcome intrusion into our lives, something that should not be there.
It is difficult, if not impossible, to see anything positive in suffering; it
must be avoided at all costs…
…Still, my own pain in life has taught me that the first step to healing
is not a step away from the pain, but a step toward it.…I am convinced that
healing is often so difficult because we don’t want to know the pain….But I know now, at least, that attempting
to avoid, repress, or escape the pain is like cutting off a limb that could be
healed with proper attention.” Henri Nouwen, Life Of The Beloved
p.92-93,95)
Loneliness:
Going back to my own journey, the pain I was finally getting
in touch with in the second wound, finally facing, was that of loneliness. As I
kept digging into the story and stories behind the wound, the more I was
realizing what I was dealing with was loneliness. In an effort to get this pain
out, I wrote this post on my xanga on
March 6th, 2007:
“Every self-defense mechanism I've built in my life
tells me not to write this post. They tell me not to bring any of this to
the surface or I'll wound people...just like before. They tell me it is
better to hide and hurt than to feel and risk lashing out in anger...like my
dad. That it is better to hide and hope for help rather than to unveil and feel
and either have my cries heard and ignored or be responded to and
helped out of compulsion, only to be left alone as soon as the
"problem" is "dealt with." They tell me that a third
response, that someone will respond not out of compulsion but out of love, is
impossible, because if it were then it would have happened already. And it points
not to any logic but to my experience as proof. I really don't want to write
this post.
Which is exactly why I have to write it.
After the schoolyear of my Junior year of high school,
a year in which God completely changed the course of my life and stamped an
inescapable call on my life (I chose it, as well), I found that call
leading me into places in life I really didn't want to go. Over the course of
the following summer a few various factors brought me to a place where I
refused to go any further with God's plan for my life. I wasn't openly
rebelling; I wasn't directly turning from His path for my life into sin, but I
wasn't any longer walking with Him either. I was stuck, which I am learning now
may be closer to hell than open rebellion is (in the same way that hate is not
the opposite of love, but a twisted form of it; indifference is more
like an opposite to love than hate is). No longer working with God
though not visibly falling away from Him, I disengaged from real life
and fell into a state of passivity, a position of strength or potential
rotting away locked inside pain or fear. I lived there for almost two and
a half years, until I was absolutely dying on the inside and knew it. Unwilling
to live in death any longer, I was able to initiate some changes and slowly
come out of that state. Some of the changes I made were instrumental in
bringing about the radical change I went through in the year 2006.
Some of you have heard this story before. I do not
hide it. I do not fear its unveiling. There is nothing there but facts. This,
however, I fear to mention, as it appears to level an accusation at all who
knew me during that time: I have no doubt that those two plus years could have
been cut short if somebody had seen what was going on, the disengaging I
had done, and had been willing to call me on it and stuck with me while I
came out of it. But no one did, and eventually God brought me to a
place where I had to learn to drag myself out.
The worst part of it all was that no one even knew,
or if they did were brave enough to do something about it. I was so successful
at hiding that no one even knew I was hiding, and no one ever came to find me,
which hurt worse than all the other pains combined. No one knew my true face
well enough to call it forth when it disappeared, so I was free to run
from it (and into death) without any accountability. That freedom to walk in
death knowing no one will call me back into life is quite
possibly the scariest thing I have ever experienced. It is a horrid
feeling of power...and invisibility. To know one could disappear without it
being noticed is like walking a tightrope with no net below. You're on your
own.
I write this all not to blame anyone for what
happened, for I know I've done the same thing to countless others through
selfish ambitions, but to break the pattern of silence.
It has been happening again. I have been disengaged
for about a month now and no one knows it but me, and if I didn't do something
to break the silence (like this post, or something similar), I don't doubt it
could continue for a long while yet. Once again I find myself called to
something that will be wonderfully transforming that I'm shrinking from,
but nobody is calling me on it.”
"Two are better than one, because they have a
good return for their work: If one falls down, his friend can help him up.
But pity the man who falls and has no one to help him up! Also, if two lie down
together, they will keep warm. But how can one keep warm alone? Though one may
be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not
easily broken." (Ecclesiastes
4:9-12)
That day I also put posted some phrases representative of
all the churning thoughts and emotions in my soul.
“I have buried my intensity for far too long.
‘Why are you running from me? I am your strength.’
I fear if I truly come to life, the intensity of that
life will hurt people, though I desperately try not to, just like before.
Surely it is better to sit in silence and rot away
inside than to open up and wound others.
Being a Wentworth seems to come so
naturally for me.
How does one find the proper channels to pour strength
into?
I am sick of
dying but I don't know how to live.”
Feeling the pain of loneliness wasn’t anything new for me,
but for the first time that I could remember I had stopped running from it. I
had stopped burying deep within me, pretending it didn’t exist or didn’t
matter. At least, as funny as it sounds, I knew I wasn’t alone in my
loneliness. It was a universal pain I was dealing with, and knowing that was enough
to begin to face it. As Henri Nouwen said above, the first step toward healing
is not a step away from the pain, but a step toward it. I was (and still am)
slowly learning to receive my loneliness pangs as a signal to spend some time
with God.
“I once heard a wise
and scholarly man say, ‘If we know ourselves at all, it is with the greatest
difficulty.’ He spoke the truth. To know ourselves at all is to begin to be
healed of the effects of the Fall, for it involves coming into a
listening-speaking relationship to God. It is to recapture at least to some
extent the Edenic situation. It is to realize more perfectly or union and
communion with God. No small thing, indeed, but it is our inheritance (and a
neglected one) as Christians. It is the healing of our primal loneliness.
‘We are born helpless.
As soon as we are fully conscious we discover loneliness,’ as C.S. Lewis has
said. Born lonely, we try hard to fit in, to be the kind of person that will cause others to like us. Craving and
needing very much the affirmation of others, we compromise, put on any face, or
many faces; we do even those things we do not like to do in order to fit in. We
are bent (to use Lewis’s imagery) toward the creature, attempting to find our
identity in him. Slowly and compulsively, the false self closes its hard,
brittle shell around us, and our loneliness remains.” Leanne Payne, The
Broken Image p.124)
Like pain, or rather as a type of pain, I have always found
loneliness to be directional, even if I don’t always want to go the direction
it is leading, and the direction I’ve always found it to lead to is toward God.
I’ve struggled to accept that over the years, trying to soothe that ache I call
loneliness with anything but Him, but if those wells I’ve drank from gave
living water, one drink would have satisfied. But they don’t, they can’t. They
can only tantalize, and even that for only so long. And always, when I’m sick
of the ash and emptiness I’ve been gorging myself on, when I turn back to Him
He welcomes me with open arms and I can taste joy again.
John and Stasi Eldredge, speaking specifically of and to
women, but I think applying equally to both men and women (it’s just more
pronounced in women) have written a wonderful passage that speaks exactly what
I mean by this.
“Why did God curse Eve with loneliness and heartache, an emptiness that
nothing would be able to fill? Wasn’t her life going to be hard enough out
there in the world, banished from the garden that was her true home, her only
home, never able to return? It seems unkind. Cruel, even.
He did it to save her. For as we all know personally, something in
Eve’s heart shifted at the Fall. Something sent its roots down deep into her
soul---and ours---that mistrust of God’s heart, that resolution to find life on
our own terms. So God has to thwart her. In love, He has to block her attempts
until, wounded and aching, she turns to Him and Him alone for her rescue.
‘Therefore
I will block her path with thornbrushes;
I
will wall her in so she cannot find her way.
She
will chase after her lovers but will not catch them;
she
will look for them but will not find’ (Hosea 2:6-7).
Jesus has to thwart us
too---thwart our self-redemptive plans, our controlling and our hiding, thwart
the ways we are seeking to fill the ache within us. Otherwise, we would never
fully turn to Him for our rescue. Oh, we might turn to Him for our ‘salvation,’
for a ticket to heaven when we die. We might turn to Him even in the form of
Christian service, regular church attendance, a moral life. But inside, our hearts remain broken and captive and far
from the One who can help us…
…Wherever it is we
have sought life apart from Him, He disrupts our plans, our ‘way of life’ which
is not life at all.” (John and Stasi Eldredge, Captivating p.96)
I remember early on in my struggles with loneliness,
somewhere in my senior high years, when I was mad at God about the unfairness
of it all, He told me something I’ve never forgotten that has forever affected
the way I view loneliness. I no longer remember the exact words, but in essence
He told me that the longings I called loneliness were longings He had as well. For me. That as much as I longed for
someone to care about who I am deep down inside and to come searching for that
part of me, for someone to truly want to know me, He longed for the same thing. Even deeper, the reason I longed for that was because I was made in His image, and created to be in relationship
with Him.
“What is it that God
wants from you?
He wants the same
thing that you want. He wants to be loved. He wants to be known as only lovers
can know each other. He wants intimacy with you. Yes, yes, He wants obedience,
but only when it flows out of a heart filled with love for Him. ‘Whoever has my
commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves Me’ (John 14:21). Following
hard after Jesus is the heart’s natural response when it has been captured and
has fallen deeply in love with Him.
Reading George
MacDonald several years ago, I came across an astounding thought. You’ve
probably heard that in every human heart there is a place that God alone can
fill. (Lord knows we’ve tried to fill it with everything else, to our utter
dismay.) But what the old poet was saying was that there is also in God’s heart a place that you alone can
fill. ‘It follows that there is also a chamber in God Himself, into which none
can enter but the one, the individual.’ You. You are meant to fill a place in
the heart of God no one and nothing else can fill. Whoa. He longs for you.
You are the one that
overwhelms His heart with just ‘one glance of your eyes’ (Song 4:9b). You are
the one He sings over with delight and longs to dance with across mountaintops
and ballroom floors (Zeph. 3:17). You are the one who takes His breath away by
your beautiful heart that, against all odds, hopes in Him. Let that be true for
a moment. Let it be true of you.” (John and Stasi Eldredge, Captivating
p.120-121)
“Not only does God
long for us, but He longs to be loved
by us. Oh, how we’ve missed this. How
many of you see God as longing to be loved by you? We see Him as strong and
powerful, but not as needing us, vulnerable to us, yearning to be desired…
…Can there be any
doubt God wants to be sought after? The first and greatest of all commandments
is to love Him (Mark 12:29-30, Matthew 22:36-38). He wants us to love Him. To seek Him with all our
hearts. A woman longs to be sought after, too, with the whole heart of her
pursuer. God longs to be desired.
Just as a woman longs to be desired. This is not some weakness or insecurity on
the part of a woman, that deep yearning to be desired. ‘Take me for longing,’
Allison Krauss sings, ‘or leave me behind.’ God feels the same way. Remember
the story of Mary and Martha? Mary chose God, and Jesus said that is what He wanted. ‘Mary has chosen what is
better’ (Luke 10:42). She chose Me.” (John and Stasi Eldredge, Captivating
p.28-29)
“Eve and all her
daughters are also ‘a stem of that victorious stock,’ but in a wonderfully
different way. As a counselor and a friend, and especially as a husband, I’ve
been honored to be welcomed into the deep heart of Eve. Often when I am with a
woman, I find myself quietly wondering, What is she telling me about God? I
know He wants to say something to the world through Eve---what is it? And after years of hearing the heart-cry of
women, I am convinced beyond a doubt of this: God wants to be loved. He wants
to be a priority to someone. How could we have missed this? From beginning to
end, the cry of God’s heart is, ‘why won’t you choose me?’ It is amazing to see
how humble, how vulnerable God is on
this point. ‘You will…find Me,’ says the Lord, ‘when you seek me with all your
heart’ (Jeremiah 29:13). In other words, ‘Look for Me, pursue Me---I want you
to pursue Me.’
Amazing. As Tozer says, ‘God waits to be wanted.’” (John Eldredge, Wild At
Heart p.36)
Even though this will offend some people theologically, I
believe that God is lonely. Not because by any means He has to be or can’t help
it, but because He has chosen to be. Not because I’ve earned it, deserved it,
or have lived a life worthy of it, but because He created me and loves me and
chose me before the foundation of the world, there is a place in His heart only
I can fill. I was created for it. And until that day comes when we are united
in full, that ache will remain in His heart as well as mine. This is why loneliness is a universal pain:
to remind the world what they were created for.
One of the principal
names for our God is Elohim, and we
find Him thus referred to 2,701 times in the scriptures. Elohim, a Hebrew word,
indicates the relation of God to man as Creator. The healing of man---and his
loneliness---has to do with acknowledging himself to be a creature, created, and in looking up and away from himself,
from self-worship to the worship of Elohim, Creator of all that is: time,
space, mass, myself. It is in this worship that our one true face appears,
displacing the old false faces. It is in this honest and open speaking
relationship that our true self bursts forth, cracking the shell of the old
false self; and our old bondages and compulsions fall away with it.” Leanne
Payne, The Broken Image p.125)
As a reminder of what we were created for, loneliness is not
to be feared but embraced. In that place of embracing it and practicing the
Presence of God we discover our true self, who God created us to be, and we
begin to accept and rejoice in that self.
“The act of
self-acceptance is the root of all things. I must agree to be the person who I
am. Agree to have the qualifications which I have. Agree to live within the limitations
set for me…The clarity and the courageousness of this acceptance is the
foundation of all existence.” (Romano Guardini, The Acceptance of Oneself,
as quoted on p.31 of Leanne Payne’s book Restoring The Christian Soul)
From that place of embracing our loneliness and finding our
true self there, we can cease
relating to others out of any and all of our many false selves and now begin to
reach out to others in their loneliness with
our true self. We now have something to offer them.
“Each one of us, not
just the ones with early deprivations such as Lana and the others suffered, has
to gain the courage and determination to face the inner loneliness and there begin to hear God and our own truest
selves. The necessity to do this is only more urgent for the Lanas and the
Lisas. In Henri Houwen’s wonderful imagery, we must convert the ‘desert of
loneliness’ within each of us into a ‘garden of solitude’ where spiritual life
begins and blossons. ‘Instead of running away from our loneliness and trying to
forget or deny it, we have to protect it and turn it into a fruitful solitude.’
This is a vital part of what it means to practice the Presence, of what it
means to come into that vertical relationship to God.
Lana’s strangest
inclination was to avoid facing her own inner loneliness, and indeed to fear
it. To fear and run from it was to fear and run from her own true self. She had
to learn (through dogged discipline at first) to protect the very thing she had always feared the
most, her own loneliness, and to find that it was indeed ‘hiding unknown
beauty.’” (Leanne Payne, The Broken Image p.106)
As long as I am looking for my loneliness to be healed, or even just assuaged, I am
looking in the wrong direction, because loneliness was never meant to be healed
on this side of heaven. But when I take my loneliness and use it as a catalyst
to help transform me, with every pang
of loneliness reminding me to seek God just as hunger pangs remind me to seek
food, then I am finally on the right track. Then loneliness, while still
painful, becomes a thing of beauty because it leads me to the Beautiful One.
God’s Pain
“’I see everything,’
he cried, ‘everything there is. Why does each thing on earth war against each
other thing? Why does each small thing in the world have to fight against the
world itself? Why does a fly have to fight the whole universe? For the same
reason that I had to be alone in the dreadful Council of the Days. So that each
thing that obeys law may have the glory and isolation of the anarchist….So that
the real lie of Satan may be flung back in the face of this blasphemer, so that
by tears and torture we may earn the right to say to this man, ‘You lie!’ No
agonies can be too great to buy the right to say to this accuser, “We also have
suffered.”…’
He had turned his eyes
so as to see suddenly the great face of Sunday, which wore a strange smile.
‘Have you,’ he cried
in a dreadful voice, ‘have you ever suffered?’
As he gazed, the great
face grew to an awful size, grew larger than the colossal mask of Memnon, which
had made him scream as a child. It grew larger and larger, filling the whole
sky; then everything went black. Only in the blackness before it entirely
destroyed his brain he seemed to hear a distant voice saying a commonplace text
that he had heard somewhere, ‘Can ye drink the cup that I drink of?’” (G.K.
Chesterton, The Man Who Was Thursday)
“As
the divine Head, He is the nerve-centre of all the body. He is indeed today
living a life of intercession for us. Prayer for others is as it were the very
breath of our Lord’s life in Heaven.” (E.G. Carre, Praying Hyde p.22)
In my journey of healing I’ve seemingly gone backwards, with
every answer leading to five more questions. But in retrospect, while it felt
like I was going backwards, I was just going deeper. I was trying to find the
root, because “you can only get out of a thing what is in its root” (Rees
Howells). Through the whole process of digging deeper that I’ve tried to
chronicle here, and of being led into sometimes expected, sometimes unexpected
directions, I always trusted that I would actually find the root if I dug long enough, that there would be an actual root I could find.
All of this I would never have embarked upon in the first
place, would never have had the courage to attempt to face my pain, had I not
been assured of God’s presence with me throughout the whole process. If I
didn’t know that even in these wounded places I feared to enter, He was already there. As painful as they
were, He understood and was with me in them. I knew I didn’t have to face them
alone, and that was enough to begin the process and enough to keep me going in
the hardest and most painful parts of my journey.
I didn’t have to face pain alone.
“If the message of
pain is directional, a call for us to link up compassionately with those who
suffer, how then does the Head of the Body relate to such suffering? How does
God ‘feel’ about those who are abused or divorced or alcoholic or unemployed or
homosexual, about the needy in Africa and Central America
and everywhere? The scope of this book does not permit me to address the ‘why’
questions of causation. But at least I must consider how God views the
suffering of creatures. Does it affect God?
A common theme has
surfaced throughout this book: that God has undergone a series of
self-humiliations---in the Creation, the covenants, the failed monarchy, the
Exile, the Incarnation, the Crucifixion, and finally as Head of a very human
church. And, I have said, in the role of Head Christ can truly---not just figuratively
or analogously---feel our pain. Yet, having made that assertion, I cannot
ignore certain important questions about the nature of infinite God. Perhaps
they have lurked uncomfortably in your mind as you have read about God’s
self-limitations. Is not God changeless, eternal? Can our pain truly affect an
essentially changeless God? Can God hurt? Did God in any sympathetic way share
the gallows with the child in Buna? These are good questions, inescapable
questions.
Such careful documents
as the Anglican Communion and Westminster
Confession declare that God is ‘without body, parts or passions.’ Can a God
without passions feel our pain? Admittedly, theologians over the centuries have
largely concluded that God does not feel passion or suffering. (Clement, for
example, urged people to strive toward freedom from passion, becoming like an
impassible God. Purge yourselves of courage, fear, cheerfulness, anger, envy,
and love for creatures, he said. A similar prejudice against passion and
emotions continued through philosophy and theology up until the Romantic
movement. Spinoza called emotions ‘confused ideas,’ and Kant urged ‘duty for
duty’s sake.’) Early Christian theology, thrashed out in a Greek intellectual
environment, held that such qualities as movement, change, and suffering
distinguish humans from gods. God is apathos, or apathetic, with no disturbing emotions whatever. Bible passages
describing God as angry or grieved or rejoicing were dismissed as
anthropomorphic or metaphorical.
Yet, here is the strange
thing: if someone with no background in philosophy and theology simply picked
up the Bible and started reading it, he or she would find a startlingly
different picture. The Bible gives overwhelming emphasis to God’s passionate
involvement with creation. It is virtually a catalogue of God’s emotions in
relating to humanity. From creation onward, God places Himself in the position
of an anxious Father whose children run free.
Each key event in the
Old Testament tells of God sharing the pain (or, less frequently, triumph) of
His people. He heard the cry of the captives in Egypt. For thirty-eight years God
pitched His tent among the shifting tents in Sinai, joining Israel in their punishment by
tabernacling among them. ‘In all their distress He too was distressed,’
concludes the prophet Isaiah (63:9).
The prophets seem to
compete in describing the depths of God’s emotional attachment to His people.
The books of Jeremiah and Hosea swell with the cry of a wounded God. ‘Is not
Ephraim My dear son, the child in whom I delight?’ God asks (Jeremiah 31:20).
‘Though I often speak against him, I still remember him. Therefore, My heart
yearns for him; I have great compassion for him.’ (Luther translates that
penultimate phrase, ‘My heart is broken.’)
In Hosea God declares,
‘My heart is changed within Me; all My compassion is aroused’ (11:8). ‘Why did
you forsake me?’ God asks often. ‘My people have forgotten me,’ He laments. In
Isaiah the boldest figure of speech used by any prophet compares God to a woman
undergoing labor:
‘For a long time I have kept silent,
I have been quiet and held myself
back.
But now, like a woman in childbirth,
I cry out, I gasp and pant.’ (42:14)
Clearly, events arouse
in God either joy or sorrow, pleasure or wrath. The Old Testament portrays a
God who is not ‘wholly other’ or remote, but One involved with creation. God
goes with His people into exile, into captivity, into the fiery furnace, into
the grave. A phrase like ‘My heart is broken’ is metaphorical, to be
sure---when applied to God or to a human being. But a writer employs a metaphor
to point to a truth, not its opposite. Abraham Heschel, a Jewish theologian,
concludes, ‘The statements about pathos are not a compromise---ways of
accommodating higher meanings to the lower level of human understanding. They
are rather the accommodations of words to higher meanings.’
Could it be that the
church Fathers, so intent on protecting God from any deficiency of being,
missed an obvious possibility: that God
voluntarily put Himself in the position of being affected by creation? Love
involves giving, and God, self-complete, has only Himself to give. God
surely does not suffer out of some deficiency of being, as His creatures do,
but from the love that overflows from being. That is, in fact, how the Gospels
define love: ‘For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only
Son.’” (Paul Brand)
What kind of a God would do something like that, to have a
heart like that? What kind of God would allow Himself to be vulnerable, to feel
pain when He didn’t and doesn’t have to? Our
God is like that!
“We struggle to
imagine it: a perfect heart within a perfect God within a perfect man
breaking---in any circumstance. We
mistakenly interpret that word perfect to mean invulnerable. We think of a heart that’s so ‘together,’
it’s beyond being bruised. But isn’t it
quite the opposite? A heart never moved is called hard and dysfunctional. A
man who can’t cry is to be pitied above all. But a soft, sensitive, supple
heart---one that is open and feels deeply---that’s a good heart. It’s a heart that loves in all of love’s fullness and in
spite of love’s costs.” (Bruce Marchiano, Jesus Wept p.37)
In all our distress, He too is distressed. He shares our pain. And the proof of this
is in His incarnation, in the time He shed the glories of heaven for the
limitations of this earth, the limitations you and I face every day. He became
one of us and lived among us. As The
Message by Eugene Peterson paraphrases John 1:14: “The Word became flesh and blood, and moved into the neighborhood.”
“Since the children
have flesh and blood, He too shared in their humanity so that by His death He
might destroy him who holds the power of death---that is, the devil---and free
those who all their lives were held in slavery by their fear of death. For
surely it is not angels He helps but Abraham’s descendents. For this reason He had to be made like His
brothers in every way, in order that He might become a merciful and
faithful high priest in service to God, and that He might make atonement for
the sins of the people. Because He
Himself suffered when He was tempted, He is able to help those who are being
tempted.” (Hebrews 2:14-18)
“Therefore, since we
have a great high priest who has gone through the heavens, Jesus the Son of
God, let us hold firmly to the faith we profess. For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our
weakness, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we
are---yet was without sin. Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence,
so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.”
(Hebrews 4:14-16)
Bruce Marchiano illustrates this wonderfully:
A few years ago I sat in a South
African prison chapel, waiting for a Matthew film clip to finish before I addressed the inmates.
It was Victor Verster Prison, one of the two places where Nelson Mandela was
housed following his Robin
Island years. At that
point, prisons were a whole new ballgame to me, and I was somewhat intimidated.
There was no threat from the prisoners themselves, but my life experience was
so vastly removed from theirs I couldn't imagine how I could possible relate to
them.
There was only one hope, and I knew
it--pray! So there I sat, silently begging the Lord to give me something to say
to these men. "Lord, what can I say to these guys? I don't know
them!" I will never forget the response that rose in my heart.
"You don't need to know them,
Bruce--I know them.
I know every name, every struggle,
every hurt, every hope, every dream...
I know them."
I'm not sure how that strikes anyone
else, but for me, that's as profound as it gets--He knows. I
told the prisoners that, and we all sat there for a few minutes, dumbfounded.
When raw truth hits, there's not much anyone can say. Eventually, though, I
went on to talk of things that had never before occurred to me. It went
something like this:
You think you had it rough as a kid?
This Guy was born in a barn. His first bed was a feed trough. He wasn't even
two years old and people were trying to kill Him. He had to hide out with His
mom and dad--on the run, and just a baby. And that went on His entire life.
Folks were always plotting to kill Him--eventually they did.
Did you grow up being laughed at and
kicked around? Imagine Jesus hearing the laughs about His mom being pregnant
before she was married, getting teased and spit at by other kids because of it.
Did you grow up without a father or a
mother? Divorce, death, or maybe one just walked out on you? You know, Joseph
is never mentioned after Jesus is 12. Nobody knows for sure what happened to
him, but most experts figure he must have died while Jesus was just a kid.
Yeah, guys, Jesus knows that heartbreak. Imagine Him standing at His dad's
grave. and as the eldest son, He'd have to carry on and support the family. See
Him in His dad's workshop that first day, reaching for His father's tools,
tears streaming down His face--and just a kid.
Ever had no place to sleep? "Foxes
have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to
lay His head"--the words of Jesus. He even knows what it's like to have no
place to live--sleeping around campfires or on people's floors.
Ever had your face beat in? You guessed
it--the Bible says they beat Jesus so badly you couldn't even tell He was a human
being.
Friends run out on you? Jesus had a
couple choice buddies named Judas and Peter.
And He even knows what it's like to be
in a place like this. He knows because they locked Him up once.
Yeah, Jesus knows, guys.
He knows every struggle, every heartache. And not just because He's God and God
knows everything; but because when He was a man, He went through the same
things you and I go through and more. He knows because He lived it. He's
been there.
That's the story as best I can
remember, and the reason I've added it is because I've seen it mean a lot to
folks over the past couple years of telling it. It's an incredible proposition
when you stop and think about it. With all that's going on, no matter who you
are or what it may be: He
knows.
(Bruce
Marchiano, In The Footsteps Of Jesus p.137-139)
“The incarnation made
possible one further aspect of the pain of God, one that has direct bearing on
our analogy of the human body. I think of my futile attempts to develop an
artificial pain system. All my patients intellectually understood pain,
acknowledged its value as a warning signal, and abhorred the injuries and
wounds on their painless hands and feet. Yet until they ‘felt’ pain for
themselves, inside their own brains, they had not suffered.
It seems inappropriate
to think of a ‘developing awareness’ within God, but something like a
progression did occur as implied in the mysterious phrase in Hebrews 2:10,
‘made perfect through suffering.’ Imagining pain is one thing---God as designer
had surely understood its physiological values and limitations. Grieving in
response to pain, feeling with His people, suffering with humanity---all these,
too, link God and man. Still, something was missing.
Until God took on the
soft tissue of flesh along with its pain cells just as accurate and subject to
abuse as ours, God had not truly experienced pain. By sending the Son to earth, God learned to feel pain in the same way
we feel pain. Our prayers and cries of suffering take on greater meaning
because we now know them to be understood by God. Instinctively, we want a God
who not only knows about pain, but shares in it and is affected by our own. By looking at Jesus, we realize we have
such a God. He took on the limitations of time and space and family and
pain and sorrow. (It would have been far
easier and more pleasant for God simply to abolish pain rather than to share
it. Pain exists not as a proof of God’s lack of concern, but because it has a
place in creation significant enough that it cannot be removed without great
loss. I, of course, see the effects of that loss every day in my leprosy
patients. For this reason, if I held in my hand the ability to eliminate human
pain, I would not exercise the right. Pain’s value is too great. Rather, I lend
my energies to doing all I can to help when that pain turns into suffering.)
Christ has now
ascended, and in the new role of Head receives messages of pain reporting in
from all over His Body. My brain does not feel pain inflicted on its own
cells---protected in a skull of bone, it needs no such warning cells. Yet it
desperately feels the pain of other cells in the body. In that sense, Jesus has now placed Himself at the receiving end of our
pain, with actual consciousness of the pain we endure….
…In two profoundly
suggestive passages, Christ identifies with suffering people so completely that
He fills their place and bears their pain. Matthew 25:35-40 shows Him accepting
ministry to the hungry, the thirsty, the sick, the naked, the vagrants, the
prisoners, as though it were done to Him. In Acts 9:4, during Saul’s blinding
epiphany en route to Damascus,
Jesus asks, ‘Saul, why do you persecute Me?’ The whips and stones directed against persecuted Christians had
fallen on Jesus Himself. In these cases,
at least, it seems inappropriate to ask, ‘Why does God allow their suffering?’
‘Why does God allow Himself to suffer?’ would be closer. God’s identification
with our pain is that complete.”” (Paul Brand and Phillip Yancey, In
The Likeness Of God p.523-526)
All throughout this healing journey, as my answers kept
leading me to more questions and deeper understanding, as I moved from feeling
and fearing pain through the whole process of gaining understanding into the
roots of that pain that I’ve chronicled thus far, to finally feeling and
befriending that pain by beginning to listen to it, I always knew where my
journey would ultimately lead me.
It lead me to the
cross.
If through the incarnation we learn that God shares our pain, then through the cross
we watch as God takes our pain. Though
I haven’t written much of the cross up till now, the cross was never absent
from any of my life as I learned all that I’ve written here. Indeed, it was and
is central to every step of transformation, every ounce of healing that I’ve
been blessed with, as it also is with anybody else’s. One result of this led a
song of the cross to dig so deeply into me during that time that its chorus
became the theme song of my heart. Now I can rarely hear the cross even
mentioned without singing this chorus inside me; I feel as if it has worked its
way into the very fiber of my being.
“The cross is my treasure,
Your blood has joined us
together,
Your greatness, Your splendor,
Has stained me forever.”
(Among
Thorns, I Could Not Love You More)
For just as we were borne on the cross by Christ, so our
pain was borne on the cross by Christ, and we need no longer carry it. The
cross is where pain finally finds its meaning.
Pain dies, just as we
do, with Christ on the cross. Truly, the cross is my treasure
“But may none of us be
cheated by a lukewarm or casual consideration. That day on Golgotha
two thousand years ago was a…day unlike any day before or after. ‘The wages of
sin is death’ (Romans 6:23), and ‘The Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us
all’ (Isaiah 53:6). Those may be very familiar words to some of us, and they
may sound philosophical and theological to others; but if, for just a moment,
we were to step back and stare down the black hole of exactly what they mean…
He was pierced…he was
crushed…it was the Lord’s will to crush him.
Sin. Iniquity. Death.
And not just death death, if you know
what I mean; but the death that takes place in life too---death in broken
families and broken hearts, broken bodies and broken trust, broken
circumstances and shattered hopes.
Yes, death takes many
forms and enjoys a multitude of layers and degrees. And in the middle of it
all, at the end of it all, the fallout and by-product of it all, the bottom
line and culmination of it all: pain.
Oh, such pain! Phenomenal, incomprehensible, immeasurable across generation
upon generation and upon nation after nation. Pain, pain, and more pain---‘and
the Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all.’
JESUS
Can any one of us even
begin to imagine? All of the pain, all of the brokenness, all of the horror, all of the loss, all of your
grief, and all of mine---all of it
that all of us put together have ever known and ever will know, and then
some---borne on Golgotha by the Son of God. Every killing and every rape. Every
war and every genocide. Every act of slavery, imprisonment, and greed. Every
wife who’s ever been slapped, every child who’s been molested. Every pencil
that’s been stolen, every automobile that ever slammed into a tree. Every
father left abandoned, every mother cheated on. Every cancer, every disease,
every Third World starvation. Every shame,
every betrayal, every fear and frustration…
He was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my
people He was stricken.
It
goes on and on---human history from day one to beyond, written in sin and
painted in all the agony that is its result. And every inch of it---every cry
ever uttered, every tear ever wept, every drop of blood ever spilled---descends
and caves in on Him, all on that Golgotha day.
It swallows Him from below. It chews on His soul. It beats and batters and
grinds His Person, all in one incomprehensible…moment of one incomprehensible Golgotha day.
My God, My God, why have you forsaken Me?
That’s
the ‘debt’ Jesus paid. That’s the price, the ‘wage’ He relinquished for our
sin. That’s the ‘race’ He bled to complete. He abandoned Himself to hell in its
ultimate degree. He invited it to do with Him whatever it would please. ‘The
punishment that brought us peace was upon Him, and by His wounds we are healed’
(Is. 53:5).
JESUS
A
long, long time ago a man and woman ate fruit from a tree they knew they
shouldn’t touch. Their nakedness turned to shame, and all of creation writhed
in its very first agony. Centuries later, the Son of the living God hangs exposed
from a tree He need never have known, children spit on His nakedness. Their
laughter paints Him with shame as He writhes in the vice grip of Creation’s
same agony.
Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the
sin of the world!
Not
so long ago---perhaps today, as I write this and you read it---a father and
mother make a decision to end their son’s life. A surgeon’s tool intrudes into
the woman’s womb. ‘Mommy, daddy, why have you forsaken me?’ The killing begins
and the son is no more. Two thousand years earlier, another Father makes a
decision to end His Son’s life. He turns His back---oh, what it costs Him to
turn His back!---and all of hell intrudes. ‘My God, My God, why have you
forsaken me?’ (Psalm 22:1). The killing begins, and the Son is no more.
The Lord makes His life a guilt offering.
It
is Sept 11, 2001. A fireman rushes into a tower built of concrete and steel to
save people he doesn’t know. The tower will fall; and, heroism beyond heroism,
heartbreak beyond heartbreak, the fireman will become one of those he sought to
save. It is Golgotha, somewhere around 30 A.D.
The Son of the living God rushes into a tower built of sin and all of hell’s
horror to save people He longs to know.
The tower will fall; and, heroism beyond heroism, heartbreak beyond heartbreak,
the Son of the living God will fling His arms wide and welcome its collapse
upon Himself, all for those He will now have a chance to know.
What shall I say? ‘Father, save me from this hour’? No, it was for this
very reason I came to this hour.
There
is pain out there in this thing we call the world---very real, very crushing,
not-to-be-thought-of-lightly pain. It is my hope that you have somehow been
spared the worst of it. At the same time, I’m very aware that you may now it
heart-breakingly well. But in all sensitivity, just for a moment, please allow
me to suggest and allow yourself to consider: there is no pain that can even
come close to the pain of Jesus. Take all of your pain and all of the pain of
everyone around you, multiply it times a billion times a billion times a
billion---and you’ve got that day. You’ve got Golgotha.
You’ve got, ‘For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son’
(John 3:16). Yes, you’ve got Jesus.
‘Roaring lions…open their mouths wide against me. I am poured out like
water, and all my bones are out of joint. My heart has turned to wax; it has
melted away within me. My strength is dried up like a potsherd, and my tongue
sticks to the roof of my mouth; you lay me in the dust of death…they have pierced
my hands and my feet.’ (Psalm 22:13-16)
JESUS
We
ask the question, ‘Why do bad things happen to good people?’ And there in the
middle of that question hangs Jesus. We ask, ‘If God is so good, why is there
so much pain in the world?’ And there in the middle of that cry, taking on
Himself every inch and every moment of all the pain in all the world, hangs
Jesus. We ask, ‘Why doesn’t God do something?’ And with every drop of His
precious Son’s blood, He looks up from the pool of His tears---tears upon tears---and
answers us all: ‘I did do something. See? There hangs my Jesus.’
And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, He gave up His
spirit.
JESUS
(Bruce Marchiano, Jesus Wept p.87-93)
Why did Christ keep
His scars? He could have had a perfect body, or no body, when He returned to
splendor in heaven. Instead He carried with Him remembrances of His visit to
earth. For a reminder of His time here, He chose scars. That is why I say God
hears and understands our pain, and even absorbs it into Himself---because He
kept those scars as a lasting image of wounded humanity. God has been here and has borne the sentence. The pain of humanity has
become the pain of God.” (Paul Brand and Phillip Yancey, In The
Likeness Of God p.529)
As wonderful as it is to know that I am not alone in my
pain, that it is shared, even borne by my Creator, I still want to be healed
from it. As valuable as it is to befriend pain, it is not a friendship I want
to last forever. I now understand pain to be valuable; I still do not find it
desirable. If my pain was borne on the cross by Christ two thousand years ago,
what then becomes of that same pain in my life right now as I offer it up to God on the cross?
If you were hoping the answer was that it disappears, then
I’m sorry to disappoint you. Though it dies, it doesn’t disappear. Sometimes,
in fact, it intensifies.
But it is
transformed.
“Christ did not,
however, stop at identification and shared experience. I have focused on the
cross, but in the resurrection that
followed He transformed the nature of pain. He overthrew the powers of this
world by first allowing sin to do its worst, then transmuting that act into His
best. The most meaningless of acts, His own innocent death, became the most
meaningful.
The
apostle Paul explored this change in a hymn at the end of Romans 8. No one can
condemn us, he says, because of Christ Jesus who died and was raised to life
and is now present with the Father. Now, nothing can separate us from the love
of Christ, not the pains of trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or
nakedness or danger or sword. No, he concludes, we are all more than conquerors
through him who loved us. And then this summing-up: ‘For I am convinced that
neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the
future [time], nor any powers, neither height nor depth [space], nor anything
else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is
in Christ Jesus our Lord.’
This, then, is the conclusion of pain. God takes the Great Pain of the Son’s death
and uses it to blot up into Himself all the minor pains of our own confinement
on earth. Meaningless pain is absorbed.
Jesus
had told His followers to ‘take up a cross’ and follow Him and to ‘drink of the
cup’ that He drinks. Paul went even further, alluding to ‘the fellowship of His
sufferings’ and to a process of filling up what is lacking in Christ’s
afflictions (Philippians 3:10; Colossians 1:24). He seldom missed a chance to
refer too such terms as crucifixion with Christ, union with His death, sharing
in His sufferings. In one passage he said explicitly, ‘We always carry around
in our body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed
in our body’ (2 Corinthians 4:10). All these fragments of mystery speak to me
of the miracle that has taken place. God
absorbs our pain so that what we endure becomes a part of what He suffered and
will become a part of what is resurrected in triumph and transformed into good.
Following a similar train of thought, the apostle Peter concludes buoyantly,
‘Even angels long to look into these things’ (1 Peter 1:12). (Paul Brand
and Phillip Yancey, In The Likeness Of God p.525-526)
I’ve differed several times in this post between a wounded
heart and a broken heart without ever really defining what I see as the
difference between them, and all for good reason, because the difference I
offer doesn’t make much sense until this part of the post anyway.
I believe, and even wrote this at the beginning of my
journey in those e-mails with my friend that started all this, that the only
difference between a wounded heart and a broken heart is in who it trusts with its pain. A wounded heart trusts in itself to handle
pain best. When it encounters the sin and pain this world is rife with, it
takes it upon itself to protect itself, enfolding itself over and over around
the wound, creating strongholds around it and freezing it so that it can never
be wounded again. It will not, even cannot, ever let itself be vulnerable
again. I’ve already written in depth on wounded hearts earlier in this post,
but what about a broken heart? As I asked on my xanga when revisiting this
question at the very end of December 2006:
“Can a heart hidden in
Christ ever be wounded? Or can it only be broken? If it can’t be wounded but
still is, is it still truly hidden in Christ? What happens to a wounded heart when it comes into contact with the
broken heart of God over the same issue the wound came from?”
What does a heart hidden in Christ do when it is faced with pain? What does it look like? How does it
respond?
And how do I get one?
“Before
the cross in prayer, I could ask God all the questions those who suffer ask.
‘Why do you make me look at injustice? Why do you tolerate wrong?’ (Habakkuk
1:3). One day in prayer, I was reminded that Jesus on the cross also asked God
a why question: ‘My God, My God, why have you forsaken Me?’ (Mark 15:34). It
was then I realized that the Father did not answer Jesus’ question (nor did God
answer Habakkuk’s). But three days later God responded by resurrecting Jesus
from the dead. We may not receive the answers to our why questions, but we
shall receive comfort for our pain through the resurrection power of Jesus,
available to us in prayer.
In
the end, I learned to concentrate on the remedy and ask the more important
questions. ‘How in this circumstance,
Lord Jesus, can I apply the healing power of the cross?’ The answer was to look
up and out of myself, in the midst of my pain, and hurt with my eyes fixed on
Christ, risen from the dead, victorious over sin and evil.” Mario
Bergner, Setting Love In Order p.45)
The Healing Presence
Remember the definition given earlier for the heart? It is a
metaphor referring to both my spirit and soul together, so let’s be more
specific here: what is it that we’re hiding in Christ? Colossians 3:3 says it
is our life that has been hidden with
Christ in God. The word for life there in the original Greek is Zoe. According to W.E Vine’s Expository Dictionary of New Testament
Words, Zoe speaks of “life as a
principle, life in the absolute sense, life as God has it, that which the
Father has in Himself, and which He gave to the Incarnate Son to have in
Himself (John 5:26), and which the Son manifested in the world (1 John 1:2).”
Zoe is contrasted with Bios, also
translated into English as “life,” which is “used
in three respects (a) of the period or duration of life (Luke 8:14), (2 Tim.
2:4); (b) of the manner of life, life in regard to its moral conduct (1 Tim.
2:2), (1 John 2:16); (c) of the means of life, livelihood, maintenance, living
(Mark 12:44), (Luke 8:43, 15:12, 15:30, and 21:4), (1 John 3:17). In
comparison, “In bios, used as a manner of life, there is an
ethical sense often inhering which, in classical Greek at least, zoe does not possess. In Scripture, zoe
is the nobler word, expressing as it continually does, all of the highest and
best which the saints possess in God.”
It is this life (Zoe), currently hidden in Christ, that
Christ came so that we might have (John 10:10), and it is a life that we as
believers have already passed from death into (John 5:24). Christ Himself is this life,
our life (Col. 3:4). So as we receive Him we receive life (Zoe). As I
quoted from Mario Bergner near the beginning of this post, “To the Christian, all becoming is incarnational---it is a life that is poured into us from
on high. That Life is Jesus.” That life, according to the definitions I
used earlier, is the life of the Spirit,
that part of me in union with Christ. When we live our lives (Bios) out of that
centered place, Christ Himself lives His life (Zoe) through us. It is that
continual choice to live out of that centered place in Christ that hides our
hearts in Christ, because it places our soul in submission to our spirit and
therefore the Spirit of God as well.
When our soul is in submission to Christ’s zoe in our spirit, it is hidden in
Christ, because the events of the outside world, whatever they may be, are
filtered through the spirit before they ever reach the soul. The spirit (united
with Christ, the healthy, holy place within every believer) is the first
responder to the world, not the soul (thoughts, emotions, memories, beliefs,
habits, attitudes, and so on). When a heart (spirit and soul together) is
hidden in Christ, the pain and message of any event facing it has to go through Jesus’ heart to get to that
heart, and to get through His heart it
has to go through the cross with Him, where it is transformed. Nothing in
this world looks the same when you view it through the cross. While our pain
doesn’t disappear, when it finally reaches us through Him we no longer look at
it from the same perspective we once did, the message it contains is radically
different. The answer to any potentially
wounding event in this world is a heart hidden in Christ.
“All
stories of healing in the Scriptures, when imaged by the mind, are incarnational. Grace is channeled into us. God sends His
Word and heals us. The Healing Presence descends into us and does it….We alone
have a Savior of the deep mind and heart, One who descends into it and becomes its righteousness, its
sanctification, its holiness. Faith, knowledge, love, moral conduct, apostolic
courage, hope, prayer, completion: all we have to do with Christ in us. This is
the way it really is, and the imagery with which our hearts perceive this
reality is crucial.” Leanne Payne, The Healing Presence p.135)
What does this process of submitting the soul to Christ’s
Spirit, of hiding our hearts in His look like? Mario Bergner, early on in his
journey of healing from homosexuality, writes of a crisis weekend in which he
learned precisely how to do this.
“After receiving so
much help from Pastor Brown, from Leanne’s class, and from repenting and being
filled with the Holy Spirit, I had a most incredible experience with God one
weekend. It was Thursday afternoon, and classes were canceled for Friday. Three
long nights and two empty days awaited me before Sunday morning came and
fellowship with other Christians. Sitting in my comfortable little apartment in
Ohio, I began
to feel the dread of being alone for such a long time. The sexual arousal
linked to this anxiety resulted in overwhelming temptations. I knew full well
that if I left my apartment, I would surely have a sexual fall.
Deciding to stay at
home that evening, I watched a little television and did some reading. When
Friday morning came, again deep anxiety and overwhelming homosexual temptation
gripped me the moment I awakened. Except now the feelings seemed to have grown
worse over the night. That morning during my devotions, I heard God say to me,
‘I love you, Mario.’ At the end of that prayer session a deep God-given
assurance filled me: If I could make it through until Sunday morning without a
sexual fall, then never again would my body be devoured with homosexual
temptation like this. I just knew it. Aligning my will with God’s will and
deciding that a sexual fall was out of the question, I took out a Band-Aid and
placed it over the inside of my front door and the molding around it. Then I
promised God I would not break that seal until Sunday morning came, no matter
how anxious or sexually tempted I became.
As Friday afternoon
and evening progressed, the temptation and anxiety grew worse---something I did
not think possible. I cleaned every corner of my apartment, straightened files
I hadn’t looked at in years, wrote letters to old friends, made long-distance
phone calls and, above all, practiced the presence of Jesus. Friday night was
spent primarily tossing and turning in what seemed like the longest night of my
life. The Band-Aid seal was still on the door.
Saturday morning came.
Now I faced a spotless apartment, orderly files, and a stack of letters written
to people I hadn’t corresponded with in years. All I could do was pray, read,
and practice the presence of Jesus. Inside me the gnawing anxiety and forceful
homosexual temptation still raged.
That afternoon, all
alone in my living room, I read aloud and performed a one-person play, The
Passion of Lady Bright, by Joe Orton, a
gay playwright. The play tells the story of an aging male homosexual who is no
longer young enough to attract bedfellows. His walls are covered with the
signatures of all the one-night stands he has brought home over the past twenty
years. As the play unfolds, he tries to remember the faces attached to the
hundreds of signatures that adorn his walls. Some he remembers; while others he
cannot. It is a sad play, but a truthful one, as in the end he realizes he is
an aging homosexual with no one to love. In the play, Lady Bright is really a
burned-out old queen living in a monologue, utterly alone and without hope.
After finishing my
living room performance of this play, I fell to my knees in horror. Crying out
to God, I begged, ‘Dear Lord, please don’t let me become another Lady Bright.’
At that point, I remember one of my most frightful memories from the gay
lifestyle.
It was Christmas Eve,
four years earlier. Several friends and I went out for a drink to one of our
favorite gay bars. The city was covered with a layer of freshly fallen snow, and
large flakes quietly and slowly dropped from the sky. As we walked from our car
to the bar, a church bell struck midnight.
‘Hey, it’s Christmas
morning,’ one of my friends said. ‘Merry Christmas.’
Just as we approached
the front door of the bar, it swung open and out stumbled a drunken older
homosexual man. He fell on the snow-covered sidewalk, let out a profane
expletive, managed to return to an upright position, and then staggered past
us. The same friend who had wished us all a Merry Christmas contemptuously
sneered, ‘How would you like to be that old fag on Christmas morning?’
As he said this, a
shocking stillness came over me. With piercing sincerity I spoke out the
thought I knew we all feared. ‘In thirty years, I am going to be that lonely old fag on Christmas morning.’
Without a doubt, if we continued as we were, we would all one day become Lady
Brights or old trolls hiding in the shadows of gay bars. What we become when we
live our lives apart from God is horrible.
Although
I now struggled with homosexuality, I was not alone. I was not living in the
arid monologue described in Orton’s play. There but for the grace of God went
I. I had entered into a living dialogue with God. I thought to myself, Better to be suffering before the cross
than to end up alone and hopeless.
The words of Job 13:15 rang in my ears, ‘Though He slay me, yet will I hope in
Him.’ Even if my present temptations
never let up, I would stand before the cross and hurt, till kingdom come if
necessary. Unable to form any words to pray, my painful, anxious loneliness
became my prayer. There, in the midst of unbearable suffering, I resolutely
decided to obey God. This is exactly what God was waiting for me to do.
Although
my will was still feeble and in need of much more healing, I had exercised it
in concert with God’s will. God’s presence abiding with me empowered me to do
what I had previously thought impossible. With
Christ, I had faced the fear of loneliness, anxiety, sexual temptation, and
abandonment I never before could face. This was a turning point in my
healing as I voluntarily died to my old self and identified with Christ in His
suffering. When Sunday morning came and I broke the Band-Aid seal on my door,
my true self, the self in union with the resurrected Christ, was firmly
established as the center of my soul.
The
next week I came into a powerful new realization of Christ living in me. It has
changed my life. And never again did I have to face a gut-wrenching three-day
weekend like that.” (Mario Bergner, Setting Love In Order p.92-94)
“God’s
working in me gave me the courage to endure those first few months while I was
being healed of the homosexual neurosis. Christ’s presence in me is not some
feeling I must conjure up; instead it is a reality that transcends my feeling
body. For that reason, while my body was being ravaged with homosexual desires,
I could call on God in those moments when I did not feel Him near me. Without
shame or guilt I waited in His presence until the ravaging desires passed.
Eventually, the homosexual desires I had once eagerly sought to fulfill were
transformed into temptations to do something I no longer wanted to do. Another
lived in me. His righteousness in me, Christ in me, was transforming me from
the inside out.
Now when I am tempted to sin, I immediately
look up and out of myself and call on Jesus name. Then I acknowledge that
though I am still a sinner, my primary identity is my true self in union with
Christ. From the center of that self, where I partake of God’s nature, I exercise
the power available to me to obey Him. I continue practicing the presence of
God with me and within me until the temptation is over. In doing this, I’ve come to see that the
duration of a temptation is limited. The more we persevere in His presence, the
shorter temptations last. Never have I denied the temptations present in my
body. I’ve merely come to acknowledge the greater reality: There is Another who
lives within me and He will see me through this.” (Mario Bergner, Setting
Love In Order p.104)
“I have learned to instruct people, as soon
as temptation strikes, to invoke the Presence, saying, ‘Come, Lord Jesus,’ and
then to practice the presence of God,
with, within, and all about them. In this way, they immediately get themselves
centered; they abide in God. They
know and affirm their position in God---that they are in Christ and He in them. Then sometimes
immediately, and always amazingly, the demonic force and spiritual warfare
recedes. What at first seems overwhelming in its power to overshadow, slime,
and hold us in its foul clutches simply fades backward, declawed and
whimpering.” (Leanne Payne, Restoring The Christian Soul p.21)
A heart hidden in
Christ trusts in Christ to deal
with the pain it feels. As I quoted from Bruce Marchiano earlier, a broken
heart is “a heart that loves in all of
love’s fullness and in spite of love’s costs.” When it encounters the sin
and pain this world is rife with, it immediately runs to the cross and hurts there. From there it watches as Christ takes that pain from it. It
refuses to allow strongholds to form around the painful area, instead remaining
open, unafraid to be hurt again if need be. It is after something greater
than safety and self-preservation, so it chooses to face that evil with
the open, broken heart of Christ, and overcomes that evil with good. It will
remain hurting there at the cross as long as it needs to, until it receives
healing.
“I
explained again how it is one stands and hurts. ‘See the cross, Patsy; see yourself standing and hurting, acknowledging
all these feelings, but this time let Christ take them into Himself. Let them
flow into Him, just as you would sins you have confessed.’
Just as we take our place in Christ’s death,
dying again with Him to our own sins, so we die to these diseased feelings by
allowing Him to take them into Himself. And we learn to wait, still suffering
if necessary, until relief and healing come. But we do it from our true center,
not from an immature or false one…
…As
we learn more about the process of healing within the soul, we often find that
the power to feel the pain is itself a vital part of the healing. The sufferer
has repressed this heretofore and denied it precisely because it was so
painful. But now he has to get it up and
out. He needs to understand that, if he will stand in the cross and hurt, there
is a place for it to go, an end to the pain. This seemingly endless pain is
the way he gets in touch with and names the heretofore repressed grief, fear,
anger, and shame underlying his depression. In order to come out of certain
types of depression, one must feel the most appalling pain and grief. It often
seems that death would be easier. But repressed grief and sorrow and loss
remain to afflict us in other ways until we grieve them out. It is a wonderful thing
to stand in Christ, identify with His suffering for us, and grieve out our
griefs and yield up our angers, naming them and forgiving others at the same
time.” (Leanne Payne, Healing Presence p.205)
As it waits in Christ’s presence at the cross, it places
itself in what I call “the receptive position” and listens. I won’t go in depth on how to listen to God here, largely
because learning to listen to God has been a long journey for me that I have
yet to find adequate words for, and as much as I’ve learned, I’m still just
beginning. But listening is something that must be learned to deal properly
with pain; indeed, it is vital skill needed to undergo any transformation at
all.
“In
two of my earlier books, The Broken Image and Crisis in Masculinity, I
tell about one person after another who could live from the center because of a
diseased inner vision of themselves. And they were all healed in the same way.
They came into the Presence of God and listened. There illumination, forgiveness, cleansing, and healing took place.
Fixing their eyes solely on Him, they climbed up and out of the old center of
self and into their new center, which is His presence living in them. (Note
here the practice of the Presence of God in His sovereign otherness, His
objective reality. To lose that is to lose His immanent dimension.) To remain
in the true center is to gain not only release from diseased attitudinal
patterns, but the great virtue of self-acceptance.
Only the real ‘I,’ shedding its illusory
selves, can draw nearer to God. In His Presence, my masks fall off, my false
selves are revealed. I stand
stripped and naked before Him. To
continually abide in His presence is to have one face only---the true one. To
draw near Him, therefore, is to find the real ‘I’ as well as its true home, my
true center. Prior to this, I am split; I walk alongside myself, I am
egocentric, I am uncentered.” (Leanne Payne, Healing Presence p.82-83)
“In
learning to practice His presence, we bring every thought of our minds, every
imagination of our hearts into subjection to Christ who is Lord of our lives. In listening to Him, we exchange our
way of seeing and doing for His.
Isaiah,
prophesying of Christ the obedient Servant who was to come, said:
‘He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or decide by what he
hears with his ears; but with righteousness he will judge the needy, with
justice he will give decisions for the poor of the earth.’ (Isaiah 11:3-4)
And
this is exactly what Jesus did: He judged by what He heard the Father speak; in
the power of the Spirit, He did only what He saw the Father doing (see John
8:28-29).
We
too, even as our Lord, listen in order to be the obedient disciple, in order to
do the works of God. ‘For sword, take that which the Spirit gives you---the
words that come from God’ (Eph. 6:17 NEB).
Listening
to God is the most effective tool we have in our ‘healing kit,’ for by it we
know how to collaborate with His Spirit. Teaching others to listen is one of
the most valuable lessons we as spiritual directors can give them; by this
freedom to hear, they pass from immaturity (being under the Law or laws) to
maturity (the walk with Christ in the Spirit), both as persons and as
Christians. The Lord Himself becomes their chief counselor and guide, and our
vocation is made easier.” (Leanne Payne, The Broken Image p.134)
“We
are dialogical creatures; we become mature as we are spoken to and respond. We
who desire healing must daily put ourselves in the responsive position,
expectantly waiting before God for that word that will heal us. Once we receive
it, whether it is from the Scriptures, another Christian believer, worship, a
good sermon, or a prophetic word we hear from God in prayer, we then have the responsibility to act on
that word. Responsibility is at the heart of becoming mature in Christ
Jesus.” (Mario Bergner, Setting Love In Order p.106-107)
As we wait at the cross and listen, open to whatever He
might have for us, He unfailingly (though not always at the time or in the
manner we expect) sends what Leanne Payne often calls “the healing word.” This
word may be in any number of forms, or it may even be a picture, video, or
something non-auditory. The word He sends is always aimed at the root of the
problem---the lie contained in the wound, the message we’ve swallowed that did
not come from Him. After we receive it, we are then responsible to act on it,
to take captive the lie and renew our minds with truth.
This is where I am now. I’ve received so much from the Lord,
both this past year and in years past, things that were not meant to be kept to
myself. I set aside much of my life (plans, ambitions, desires, time, focus,
etc.) this past year to dive in as deeply as I could into healing and
wholeness, to get at the roots of some behavior patterns and weaknesses that
have long plagued me. In their place I have begun to develop strong, healthy
roots, grounded in God’s truth, reality, and love. In a time of listening just
recently during my guys group, the picture God gave me of myself right now is
that of a flower just about to blossom. But it first has to decide if it truly
wants to leave the relative comfort and safety of the stem and open up to show
its face to a cold, often harsh world, performing the act it was created to do,
even if God alone sees the beauty of it.
To all who have asked me what I am writing about for the many
months I’ve been writing this I have told that I am writing about what I have
learned this last year. But this is only partly true. The greater truth I’ve
discovered along the way is that I’ve been attempting to write is who I’ve become, and to do that it is
necessary to put to words what I’ve learned. This is one of the reasons why
I’ve interspersed bits and pieces of my own story throughout the fabric of this
post. I don’t want to just share information; I want to share me, and the information that has shaped
me. You may recall that I wrote at the beginning of this post that I don’t want
these words to be empty, mere conclusions I’ve reached but never really lived. And
as we say in the guys group I’m a part of, I don’t want to be like Noah coming
down off the mountain having already learned everything and won every victory,
ready to teach all you commonfolk the way to holiness. (Sorry, inside joke.)
With all that in mind, I feel led to share with you all the
third battle I’ve been fighting as well as how I’ve been learning to fight it,
and, for the first time in a long time, to win it.
I have, ever since
somewhere around 10th grade, struggled with pornography. At this
point I cannot remember how it first began or why I first decided to pursue
porn, nor does it really matter anymore, but I do remember my first thought
immediately following that first time: “My
eyes have just lost their virginity.” I mourned this fact for a few weeks,
horrified at what I had done, but soon enough I went back for more, and then
more, and then more. Over the years pornography became my Romans 7 issue,
something I didn’t want but couldn’t get free from. I could refrain from it,
even abhorring it for 30 days out of a month, but it always seemed that on that
31st day (always hidden somewhere differently inside that month) I
would be weak and would give in. It became, to borrow a phrase from a friend
describing a similar struggle, “inevitable.” I eventually lost the ability to
say “no” and could only say “not now.” From tenth grade until just recently,
including during this whole healing process I’ve been through, I can’t recall a
time where I went for longer than a month without seeking out pornography.
As painful as it is to confess and write that, I did it for
three reasons, with the first being I felt God led me to share it here and the
second being what I wrote about just above this, namely that I don’t want to
lead anybody to believe with my writing that I’ve conquered every battle when I
haven’t yet. What I’ve learned hasn’t won any battles for me; it’s just taught
me how to win battles. And that leads
me to the third reason for sharing this: Since
almost a week into 2008, I’ve been free from pornography! Praise God! Two
big reasons for this are the guys group I’ve been a part of this past year and
the fact that I know I’ll find it impossible to step into some of the actions
God has called me to this summer (and beyond) if this battle wasn’t won, so it
had to be won. But it’s the final main reason that has got me the most excited
about my future and convinced that my days of being in bondage to pornography
are over (though there will probably always be a battle involved).
I now know how to win the battle for my mind, how to renew
my mind, and the answer lies in the sanctification of my imagination.
“Is your imagination
stayed on God or is it starved? The starvation of the imagination is one of the
most fruitful sources of exhaustion and sapping in a worker’s life. If you have
never used your imagination to put yourself before God, begin to do it now. It
is no use waiting for God to come; you must put your imagination away from the
face of idols and look unto Him and be saved. Imagination is the greatest gift God has given us and it ought to be
devoted entirely to Him.” (Oswald Chambers, My Utmost For His Highest,
Feb. 11th)
At the root of my journey into the wounded, frozen parts of
my life I found two things needing to be dealt with: lies and pain. To get to the root of the lies, which were
the real problem but felt normal, I usually had to go through the pain, which felt like the real problem but was
actually a gift from God to warn me of the lies hidden underneath.
Now that we know how to handle pain, it’s time to address
the real issue---the lie imbedded as the meaning of a memory or series of
memories underlying everything else. Remember the question I left hanging
earlier of the woman who subconsciously re-experiences her past rape every time
she remembers it---can she find healing? I left it unanswered on purpose,
waiting until now to answer it.
Yes! Absolutely she can find healing! As can the rapist,
though his journey will be very different than hers will be. Neither of them
can change what has happened, but they can both change the meaning of what has happened, the message assigned to that memory,
thereby addressing the lie contained in that message. To do so, they will need
to learn how to re-enter that memory with Christ and rework it. And to do that
they will need to learn how to reclaim their imagination.
Discovering the power of imagination this past year, but
especially these last few months while I’ve been writing this, has been
incredibly eye-opening. When used rightly in God’s hands, as it was meant to
be, I believe imagination is one of the most powerful tools on earth. It is
also one of the most often ignored, especially as a person grows older. Because
of this widespread failure all across the culture to properly harness or even
notice this power, and among the church to devote it to God, most people
reading this will be shocked that I place the imagination on such a high
pedestal. So before I can even begin to explain how I’ve been learning to renew
my imagination regarding the truth about pornography and why that’s been
effective for me where everything else I’ve tried has failed, I need to share
what I’ve discovered about the imagination in the first place.
Reclaiming the imagination
“I
believe one of the most pervasive problems in contemporary Western Christianity
is that we mistakenly assume that information automatically translates into transformation. We tend to have a naïve conviction that if only we read another book
or get involved in another Bible study, our lives will be significantly
changed.
As
a matter of fact, this is not the case at all. Indeed, contemporary Western
Christians are as a whole arguably the most informed generation of Christians
in all of church history. Yet no one would be so foolish as to suggest that we
are the most transformed. To the contrary, research suggests that the faith of
American evangelicals generally has very little effect on our day-to-day lives…
So
what is the problem? There are undoubtedly a number of factors in play. Yet, as
odd as it may sound, I submit that one of the most fundamental problems is that
many of us Western Christians have forgotten how to use our imagination in
spiritual matters. For a variety of
cultural reasons, we have come to equate the imagination with fantasy and make-believe.
We have come to mistrust it, especially in spiritual matters. We have come to
identify imagination as something that takes us away from truth rather than something that can be useful, and indeed
necessary, to enable us to experience truth.” (Greg Boyd, Seeing Is
Believing p.71-72)
I’ve heard countless times that I need to renew my mind, but
I can’t remember a single time anybody ever told me I needed to reclaim my
imagination. But I’ve since come to believe that it is impossible to renew the
mind without reclaiming the
imagination in some way, shape, or form.
I write “reclaim” the imagination rather than “renew” the
imagination on purpose, though renewing it is every bit as necessary. But before
you can find it possible to renew it you have to value it, and too many people
only equate the imagination to the imaginary, thereby relegating it to the
realm of wonderful but childish things, incapable of making any real, lasting
difference in our lives as adults. While the imagination is that, it is also much, much more than that. So before you can
begin to renew the imagination you have to first reclaim it. And as you do, who
knows? In time you may find yourself agreeing more and more with Oswald
Chambers’ quote earlier: “Imagination is
the greatest gift God has given us and it ought to be devoted entirely to Him.”
(Oswald Chambers, My Utmost For His Highest Feb. 11th)
“For
most of us, the word imagination is a
vague one. For many Christians, raised on the King James Bible, the word may
hold distinctly negative connotations, for it was used in that translation to
denote a scheming or devising mind. This may be one of the factors behind the
irrational fear of the imagination which we find in some Christian circles. The
imaginative faculty, like any other human faculty, can be used for good or
evil. To ignore or fear it is dangerous, and is a kind of evil, just as
misusing it is evil.” (Leanne Payne, Healing Presence p.163-164)
“Because
we live under the influence of Enlightenment rationalism, imagination is often
equated with sheer fantasy. As
opposed to the physical world, the imagination is often seen consisting of what
is not real. If what is really real is the external, objective, physical world,
then it is assumed that what is internal simply cannot be real in the same way. As Garrett Green notes,
for modern people the imagination is often equated with ‘the imaginary.’ It is
the stuff of which children’s stories and dreamy wishes are made---nothing
more. If God ever did try to communicate to us with an inner voice, an inner
image, an inner vision, or dream (I for one believe He is always trying to do just this!), our scientific
worldview would incline us to immediately censor it from our consciousness or
write it off as ‘just imagination.’
What
compounds the problem further is the advent of secular psychology in the last
century. Modern secular psychology attempts to understand the inner world of
the human psyche the same way psychical sciences attempt to understand the
external world---namely, through natural causes producing natural effects. The
assumption behind modern science is that everything in the world is explainable
in terms of other things in the world. The world is treated like a ‘closed
system.’ Appealing to supernatural causes to explain anything is inadmissible
to modern science. Secular psychology is simply that branch of science that
applies this closed-system principle to the mind. Whatever happens in the mind
is in principle explainable by natural causes and natural effects. No supernatural
influences are allowed.
The
implication of secular psychology, then, is that everything imaginative that
takes place in the mind is the mind’s own doing. Your voice of conscience, your internal dialogue, your dreams, and
what you see with your ‘mind’s eye’ are all the products of your own mind.
While most of us don’t know the details of secular psychological theories, this
basic assumption has come to permeate our culture and exercises a strong
influence on us. The result of this cultural influence is that we are strongly
conditioned to assume that nothing in the mind has divine significance.
It
is, then, small wonder that the traditional practice of communing with God
through imagination has waned in our age. In sharp contrast to Christians in
the past, we are inclined to interpret dreams to be nothing more than the voice
of our unconscious minds at night, visions as mere hallucinations, and
imaginative dialogues in prayer as just psychological forms of
self-manipulation. No matter how much we believe Jesus is with us, for example,
many find the practice of envisioning Him standing before them to feel like
make-believe. Yet if Jesus really is
with us, isn’t a vivid image of Him being in your presence closer to truth than
any image we might have of our environment that would exclude Him?
To
the degree that the materialistic assumption about what is really real
consciously or unconsciously makes inroads into our belief system, it will be
difficult for us to sense, hear, and see the Lord the way Christians in the
past did. Our imaginations will be discredited as the proper point of contact
between us and God…
…Indeed,
the secular view of the world and the human mind as a closed system, existing
autonomous from God, is a fundamental aspect of the pattern of this world
against which believers must continuously fight. To the extent that modern
science influences us to see and experience ourselves and the world as though
God were not an ever-present reality, it is very much part of the deception of
the flesh that we must overcome if we are to be ‘transformed by the renewing of
[our] minds’ (Rom. 12:2).
If
we are to break this deception and open ourselves up to the Spirit’s dynamic
work in our lives, we will need to intentionally and unequivocally embrace the
Biblical and traditional Christian view that God can and does communicate to us
‘in [our] inner being’ (Eph. 3:16; cf. Rom. 7:22; 1 Peter 3:4). We will need to go directly against the
current of our culture and begin to acknowledge the truth that our imaginations,
when guided by the Holy Spirit and grounded in Scripture, can bring us into
contact with a spiritual reality that is inaccessible to the physical senses.
We will need to affirm that the imagination is good for more than just childhood fantasies.
The
Bible, of course, does not deny that your dreams are your dreams and that your visions are your visions, but it rejects the purely secular
conclusion that this means they cannot also be inspired by God. When we behold the Lord in the reflection of our
mind, it is our mind that is doing the beholding---and yet Paul attributes the
content of what is beheld to the Spirit (2 Cor. 3:18). (The same principle is
articulated in Paul’s teaching that ‘the spirits of prophets are subject to the
control of prophets’ (1 Cor. 14:32 NIV). Paul tells the Corinthians how and when
they should and should not exercise their supernatural gifts, though he clearly
believes that the spiritual gifts come from the Lord. There is, clearly, a
decisive element of human cooperation surrounding the supernatural influence of
God in our lives.) What we in our age of
intellectualized Christianity so desperately need to see and experience is that
our imagination and God’s Spirit can work together into a concrete and dynamic
relationship with the Lord. (Greg Boyd, Seeing Is Believing p. 128-131)
“It is sometimes
assumed by modern readers that when believers in the Bible heard a message or
saw a vision from the Lord, it was an objective experience---something people perceived with their physical ears. If
anyone else had been present with these believers when they heard God speak or
received their vision from the Lord, we sometimes assume they too would have
heard what the recipient heard and seen what the recipient saw. Since few if
any of us today hear God audibly or in any sense see God physically, we
sometimes assume that the dynamic way in which God intersected with the lives
of the believers in Scripture is no longer available to us today.
Now it is true, of
course, that the Lord did sometimes interact with His people in a physically
observable way. When Jacob wrestled with the Lord, for example, or when the
Lord led the children of Israel
in the wilderness, this was in all probability something anyone could have seen
(Gen. 32:24-30; Exod. 13:21-22; 14:19). Yet it is crucial for us to understand
that this was not the ordinary way God related to His people in Scripture.
For example, young
Samuel heard the voice of the Lord, but Eli could not hear it (1 Sam. 3:2-10).
When Daniel received his vision of a man by the Tigris River,
he said that he ‘alone saw the vision; the people who were with me did not see
the vision’ (Dan. 10:7). What is more, Daniel referred to the other visions he
received as revelations that ‘passed through my mind,’ implying that they were
subjective experiences (Dan. 7:1,15). He referred to the visions of
Nebuchadnezzar in the same fashion (Dan. 2:28,30; 4:5).
In most instances,
there is nothing to indicate that the hearing and seeing that characterized the
faith of Biblical believers was of a physical sort. God’s ordinary mode of
communication, both in biblical times and today, is to speak and appear to
those who have the spiritual capacity to hear and see spiritual realities (cf.
Ezek. 12:2; Matt. 11:15, 13:9-15; Acts 7:51). It is a spiritual hearing and seeing, and as such it is a
private experience, given only to the one intended by God to receive it. In
other words, it is an experience that took place in what today we would call
the imagination…
…To many modern Western
people, of course, saying the dreams or visions took place in the imagination
sounds like I’m denying their authenticity. Therein lies the problem: we often
identify the imagination with make-believe, but ancient people in general, and
people in biblical times in particular, did not. Rather, they generally
understood that the imagination was a means through which God could communicate
with His people. God spoke to His people by inspiring ‘what passes through the
mind.’ While they were asleep or while they were awake, God communicated to
those who were receptive to the things He wished them to hear and see. He
inspired their imaginations.” (Greg
Boyd, Seeing Is Believing p.84-86)
If the imagination is only the faculty through which little
kids invent and live in pretend worlds, then it is a wonderful---and often
irrelevant---gift from God. But if the imagination is also the faculty through
which all humans recreate and interpret all the information the five senses have
and are collecting them of the real world
around them, as well as a place where we can truly meet and interact with God, then
it is a wonderful---and incredibly
important---gift from God! And if the latter is the case, as I believe it
to be, then it would be a drastic oversight (to say the least) to ignore it.
On
what grounds do I make this odd claim that our loss of imagination lies at the
basis of our spiritual problems?...We can begin our answer by examining how
central our imagination is to all of our thought. We don’t think typically with
abstract information; we think by imaginatively replicating reality in our
minds. Imagination is simply the mind’s ability to evoke images of things that
aren’t physically present.” (Greg Boyd, Seeing Is Believing p.72)
Since I’ve already gone into some depth on how the mind
works earlier in this post you may want to go back and read that portion again
right now, but just to refresh your mind, here’s what thought is: “We think by replicating sense experience on
the inside. As authors Lakoff and Johnson put it, all thought is ‘embodied.’
Even our most abstract and general thoughts are metaphorically rooted in our
concrete, physical experience. Whenever we think, we in some way replicate
aspects of our bodily experience of the world. We think by turning our sense
experience of the world inward.” (Greg Boyd and Al Larson, Escaping The
Matrix)
Much of what I wrote earlier on the mind centered on the
power of memories to shape our lives today, but to leave it at that would be to
tell only half of the story. As the National Geographic article stated:
“The whole point of
our nervous system, from the sensory organs that feed information to the
massive glob of neurons that interpret it, is to develop a sense of what is
happening in the present and what is
about to happen in the future, so that we can respond in the best possible way.
Our brains are fundamentally prediction machines, and to work they have to
find order in the chaos of possible memories.”
Our memories enable us to find order, to make sense of the
present. Without them our world makes no sense. But our memories have power only inasmuch as they inspire our
imaginations. The imagination is the realm in which we take the memory and apply it to the present or the future,
whether consciously or subconsciously. It is where we make our predictions and
envision different options of response. It is where we translate the memory’s
meaning into the present circumstance.
“Finding out how a
person got a neurochip installed is not as important as learning how the neurochip
misre-presents reality in the present.
The important question is not ‘why
are you the way you are?’ but rather, ‘How do you do the way you are?’ Not only this, but answering the why question often takes a great deal of time,
effort, and speculation, as well as money (if done in professional therapy).
And even when you think you’ve found the right answer, this doesn’t help debug
the neurochip. It just tells you who or what to blame for it being there! It
gives you information but doesn’t itself transform you.
The question that
empowers you to change is, ‘How do you do (in your mind) the way you are?’ It’s your organic computer, and you
have the authority to program it.” (Greg Boyd & Al Larson, Escaping The
Matrix p.101)
It’s not what has happened that affects how I live my life
today; it’s what is happening in the mind in the present.
For example, most of my life I’ve been terrified of making
even simple phone calls to non-friends. Usually the situation is that I need to
call somebody to find out something, to ask a question of some sort, like if a
store has something in stock. My first response is usually to beg and wheedle
Mom to please, please make the call for me (she’s usually the one forcing me to
make the call in the first place, but that’s a whole other story…). If that
fails and I know I have to make the phone call, then I need to find out
absolutely everything I should say
beforehand, frustrating Mom to no end. During the call, if things don’t go
exactly how I’ve prepared for them I get incredibly frustrated though I usually
hold that in and sound calm until the call is over. After it’s over, if it went
well, Mom will often comment on how simple it was, and if it didn’t go so well
I will often lash out in anger and frustration, usually at her for making me go
through the whole ordeal. Either way, non-personal phone calls have been very
unpleasant experiences for me for most of my life.
Why is that? While I don’t know what memory or memories
trigger my imagination by that situation, I do now know what gets triggered
that causes such a ridiculous response to a simple phone call: a picture in my
mind of me, stranded on the phone, stammering about trying to figure out what I
need to say, wasting everybody’s time and eventually hanging up without finding
out what I needed to know, feeling like a complete failure. Like I said, why that gets triggered I don’t know,
but I don’t really need to know that to begin to deal with what gets triggered, my image of myself frozen up on the phone.
So what has happened here? A memory, in this case one I am still not aware of consciously, has been
triggered as relevant to my current situation by some part of my mind. Once
triggered, it reminds me of something that has happened and delivers the
message I have assigned to it. That is the extent of the memory’s job and
power. It has fulfilled its duty. From there my imagination takes over. It
takes all the memories dredged up (for there is rarely, if ever, just one)
along with their messages and assembles them into a coherent image, video,
sound, etc. of what it believes will
happen (freezing up on the phone). Based on what it concludes, it attaches a
message of its own to the conclusion(s) it came to, and as with the message
attached to the memories, the message of the imagination is emotionally laden.
How powerful the emotions are depends on how important it judges the situation
to be. If what it predicts to happen is something negative, it will try to
protect me from this being fulfilled however it can (I was terrified and often
angry at Mom; both were intended to keep me from making the phone call). Since most of the time all of this happened
subconsciously and seemingly instantaneously, all I was aware of at the time (until I intentionally set out to
understand what was going on underneath) was
the emotional response rising within me.
Now here’s the fascinating part: If you were following along
closely you’ll realize that the situation I was responding to wasn’t actually real. It was a
prediction based on the best information my mind had access to. I wasn’t
responding to what had happened in the past; I was responding to I thought
might happen based on what had
happened in the past. Therefore, the emotions I was feeling and responding to
were also based on a situation that wasn’t real. They weren’t emanating
from what had happened; they were
coming from what might happen. And as
such they were a horribly inaccurate and deceptive base to make a decision
from. The same is true of all emotions.
“External
events provide the occasion for our
emotions, but our emotions are grounded in what we do in our brains in response to external events. More specifically,
depression (or any other emotion) is
grounded in the mental re-presentations we produce that provide the interpretation of external events….We can’t directly alter emotions with our willpower. But we
can indirectly affect them by
altering the internal re-presentations with which they are associated. Knowing
what is true from God’s perspective, knowing the authority we have over our
brains, and knowing something about how our brains install and modify
re-presentations, we can escape emotional bondage within the Matrix.” (Greg
Boyd and Al Larson, Escaping The Matrix p.188)
Knowing the emotions I’m dealing with aren’t based in truth
enables me to place them to the side for a moment and become, as Greg Boyd
calls it, a detective of my mind. Free from the tyranny of emotions for the
time being, I can now stop and ask my soul (from my centered place in Christ) what it is doing and from there begin to
change it.
I can now begin to renew my imagination by introducing
Christ into it.
Renewing the imagination
“Satan’s
web of deception infects our imagination, which is why it has such power to
move us to perform and hide in our attempts to obtain life, with the end result
being destruction. His deception is anchored in powerful, imaginative
misrepresentations of reality, and until
these lies are confronted with the truth in ways that are at least as vivid and powerful as the misrepresentations, the lies will continue to dominate our
lives. Until this happens, our
experienced self-identity, our old self, will continue to exercise a strong
influence in our lives, suppressing the truth about who we are in Christ. We
are new creations in Christ (2 Cor. 5:17), but if this truth is believed in the
form of mere information while the old self is continually experienced in
vivid, imaginative re-presentations, we will find it nearly impossible to
display our new nature consistently.” (Greg Boyd, Seeing Is Believing p.79)
“It’s vitally important to understand that
the patterned electrical-chemical reactions in our brains that keep us from
experiencing our true identity were installed by events we experienced.
The brain records events and reactivates them whenever it thinks they are
significant for our interaction with our environment (that is, whenever
triggered). It is our brains’ built-in way of telling us to move toward
something, to move away from something, to maintain something, or to stop
something.
This
works as God intended when these reactivations produce positive feelings about
things that are truly positive and negative feelings about things that are
truly negative. But it works against us when the brain’s programming is
according to the pattern of this world. For now the brain produces positive
feelings about things that are in truth negative and negative feelings about
things that are in truth positive.
What is true of the brains’ programming is
also true of the brains’ re-programming:
it requires an event. Conceptual
information alone does not suffice. To get free from the Matrix, we have to
fight according to the rules of the Matrix. But note, the events we are talking
about are not necessarily events outside ourselves, experienced through our
five physical senses. They can be events that are experienced within our
brains.
What
matters to the neurons in our brains is not whether an event is external or
internal but only whether or not the event is experienced as real, concrete, and vivid. To debug renegade neurochips from our brains, therefore, we need to
work with God to create events in our minds that communicate truth as vividly
as our renegade neurochips communicate lies---as vivid as our memories and as
graphic as the beer commercials we watch.
So
how do we create truth-communicating events in our minds? The same way we
created deception-creating events in our minds. We create events in our minds
by experiencing something in our minds as though it were real. To create a truth-communicating event,
therefore, we simply take a truth and embody it in our mental world with all
five senses. We take a truth and mentally experience it as real…
…Don’t
just recite information about how you
think you’d be different. Get a
picture of yourself and see how
you’re different. Listen to how this God-glorifying you thinks and
speaks differently from the way you presently tend to think and speak. Observe how you feel about things when you manifest the truth of who you are
in Christ, and note how it’s different from the way you presently tend to feel
about these things. Don’t just know about the true you; experience the
true you.” (Greg Boyd and Al
Larson, Escaping The Matrix p.125-126)
“Many Christians have
learned that they need to ‘be transformed by the renewing of [their] minds’
(Romans 12:2) and have been taught that this involves telling themselves the
truth about who they are in Christ over and over again. This is certainly a
helpful and even necessary practice. But its power will be greatly enhanced if
you not only give yourself true information but also routinely practice imaginatively experiencing yourself
living the truth.
To illustrate, instead
of merely telling yourself that you are the temple of God
because His Spirit lives in you (1 Cor. 6:19), it will be helpful to imagine in
vivid detail what you look, sound,
and feel like when you perfectly
manifest this truth. Run it through your mind like a virtual-reality movie in
which you are the main actor. Experience yourself incarnating this truth ‘with
all five senses .’ Ask the Holy Spirit to help you accurately and vividly play
out scenarios in your mind that reflect real-life situations in which you
typically feel the most empty or powerless. Only now see yourself in those
situations perfectly manifesting God’s truth that you are a walking, talking
version of Solomon’s temple, filled with all of God’s glory! How do you respond
to difficult situations differently when you manifest the truth rather than the
lies you’ve internalized from the world?
Moreover, spend time
imagining, in as concrete and vivid a way as possible, using ‘all five senses,’
what you look, sound, and feel like perfectly manifesting the truth that you
are filled with God’s love, peace, and joy. Imagine this in various situations
in your life, especially those in which you tend to experience yourself lacking
love, peace, or joy.
What do you look,
sound, and feel like when you are convinced in the core of your being that you
are loved with an everlasting love, like the Bible says you are? What do you
look, sound, and feel like when you perfectly manifest the truth that you are
God’s beloved child, seated with Christ in heavenly places, blessed with every
spiritual blessing, destined to sit with him on the throne throughout eternity?
How do you react to circumstances in your life differently when you think and
live this way?
This is who you truly
are! In running imaginative movies about yourself in this fashion, you’re
simply bringing your mind into greater conformity with the true you. You’re taking every thought captive to
Christ. You’ve got to be able to experience the truth of who you are vividly in
your mind before you can ever hope to manifest it consistently in your actual
life.
As you imaginatively
rehearse truths like this over and over again, you’ll confront and overcome
deceptive re-presentations you’ve inherited from the pattern of the world that
keep you living beneath your calling and true nature in Christ Jesus.
Consequently, as you set your mind on things above in this fashion (Col. 3:2),
you’ll be in the process of transforming your experienced self-identity in the
direction of the true identity you have in Christ.
Don’t worry if at
first it feels like you’re pretending. This is not an uncommon initial response.
It is simply the result of your cultural conditioning that imagination is
merely make-believe, combined with the fact that you probably haven’t imagined
yourself living like this before. It doesn’t feel real because the movies
you’ve been running in your head up to this point have tabbed ‘the real you’ as
the you that was defined by the pattern of this world. If we hope to be transformed, we have to allow God’s Word to have more
credibility than our present feelings.
Take it on faith that
the you who responds to situations in ways that manifest the truth that you are
a temple of God, filled with God’s love, joy, and peace, is the real you.
Commit to seeing yourself as God sees you, regardless of how it feels. In time
you will likely find that this new vision of yourself ceases to feel like
pretense and begins to feel natural. It is the real you. God says so!”
(Greg Boyd, Seeing Is Believing p. 98-99)
It feels utterly ridiculous at times to believe that who God
says I am is who I truly am. But “What a
man is in the eyes of God, so much he is, and no more” (St. Francis of Assisi). It is here that
we find the difference between a healthy mind and an unhealthy one, a renewed
mind from an unrenewed one. The same decision that divides a wounded heart from
a broken heart is what distinguishes a healthy mind from an unhealthy one---who it trusts in.
“To
escape the Matrix, you must resolve to believe that what God says about you is
true however much your past or present experience tells you otherwise. However real
the old you seems, you must accept
that it is not true. In other
words, to transform our minds we must commit to ascribing more credibility to
God than to our own brains. Our Matrix-conditioned brains are the problem; they
therefore cannot be the foundation of the solution. We have to grasp hold of
something that has more credibility than our own brains. We need to have a
source of truth that doesn’t depend on our own misprogrammed, organic computer.
And this source can only be God’s Word, centered upon the person of Jesus
Christ.
If you are to experience freedom, therefore,
God’s Word about your true identity in Christ must have more credibility to you
than the word of parents, friends, other authorities in your life, and your own
past and present experiences. But it’s up to you. You are free to believe it or
not.” (Greg Boyd and Al
Larson, Escaping The Matrix p.122-123)
When I have been trusting someone or something other than
God in my mind, I am sinning and I need to repent.
The word commonly used for repent in Hebrew is metanoia, and it literally means “to change one’s mind” (noia = mind, and meta when used as a
composite means to change). So when God calls us to repent, He is literally
calling us to turn our minds around completely, to “not conform any longer to
the pattern of this world” (Rom. 12:2) but to instead “set your mind on things
above” (Col. 3:2). To accomplish this repentance, Christ has given us many
weapons (the sanctified imagination being one of them) with which we are to
“take captive every thought” (both conscious and subconscious) and bring them
to repentance. “The weapons we fight with
are not the weapons of the world. On the contrary, they have divine power to
demolish strongholds. We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets
itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to
make it obedient to Christ” (2 Corinthians 10:4-5).
Al Larson, the co-author of Escaping the Matrix, in a conference
last year at my church said something I found fascinating about this verse. He
said that we commonly think of and picture “taking captive” as a putting in
prison of sorts. We attempt to isolate the bad thought and then banish it, or
at least keep it contained and imprisoned where it can’t “infect” the rest of
our mind. We quarantine it and leave it at that, until the next time it gets
triggered and we have to fight it again. Larson, however, pointed out that the
word for captive used there (aichmalotizo)
denotes making someone or something a prisoner of war. The root words are aichme (a spear) and halonai (to be captured), so at its root
imagery the picture is of one being led to a foreign land at the end of a
spear, and that was an image that the Jewish people were quite familiar with.
When used in the context of our thoughts, “taking captive every thought” is
much more akin to capturing renegade thoughts and leading them on a journey to
the Kingdom of God than it is to imprisoning them. Or,
as Larson puts it, we are to “lead them to truth.”
Leading a thought to truth is simply creating a
truth-communicating event about that thought, searching for and finding
Christ’s perspective on that thought and then choosing to trust His
perspective. When I trust in God over myself or anybody else, I am in essence
having faith in Him. I don’t mean the
religious “I believe this and this and this” kind of faith, but faith where it
really matters, in the often subconscious predictions the mind makes on a
second by second basis. You see, as Greg Boyd explains, faith isn’t just a religious thing, it’s a life thing.
“The Bible defines
faith as ‘the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen’
(Heb. 11:1 NASB). We ‘do faith’ by
running previews in our minds of what we expect and by experiencing the
conviction that this is what will
come to pass. (Remember, all
emotions, including feeling confident something will come to pass, are
associated to mental re-presentations.) In fact, the word for assurance in this passage (hypostasis) literally means ‘substance’ (and is
translated as such in the KJV). We could
apply this to mean that faith is the substantial reality---the concrete
re-presentations---we hold in our minds that brings about the confident
expectation that something will come to pass.
People often think that
faith is only a religious thing. On
the contrary, faith is a life thing.
Faith is involved in everything we experience and everything we do…
…We see that when
Jesus told the blind men, ‘According to your faith will it be done to you’
(Mat. 9:29), He wasn’t giving a religious formula; He was giving a universal
life principle. All other things being equal, we tend to experience what we
expect to experience. What we experience as real in our minds largely
determines what we experience in our lives. Hence Scripture teaches that ‘as [a
person] thinks within himself, so he is’ (Proverbs 23:7 NASB)”
(Greg Boyd & Al Larson, Escaping The Matrix, p. 127-9)
Remember the predictions our mind makes constantly in the
imagination? Those predictions are our faith.
Choosing to have faith in Christ in my current situation means aligning those
predictions with the mind of Christ, something that Paul says we are already in
possession of (1 Cor. 2:16). Choosing to have faith in Christ always involves repenting (changing my
mind) and taking my thoughts captive (leading them to truth); both can be done
only in the presence and with the assistance of the Holy Spirit. Without Him
the mind may be changed, but it cannot be led to truth. Working in cooperation
with the Holy Spirit, then, we are able to create a truth-communicating event in
our minds and change our faith!
What does this process look like? Going back to the area of
my biggest struggles on this, pornography, I want to share a passage from Escaping the Matrix in which Al Larson
is in a counseling session with another man (Mark) who struggles with
pornography. They are working together to help Mark find the mind of Christ
concerning pornography. As a warning,
however, this is a bit graphic, so feel free to skip it if you like. I
include it because I’ve found it and the process it portrays of leading a
thought (in this case, “pornography is what men want”) to truth very helpful.
“AL: Now I’m going to pray, and as I do I
want you to ask the Holy Spirit to reveal to you the truth about pornography. (Almost
immediately Mark becomes visibly distressed and began to cry) What are you experiencing, Mark?
Mark: I see gremlinlike
demons all around the entrance of the sex store where I buy porn tapes. They’re
drooling and laughing at the men they’re trapping. One has a ring in a man’s
nose and is pulling him into the store, but I can tell that the guy doesn’t
know it. Another man is gazing ahead mindlessly and walking like a robot.
Al: That’s interesting,
isn’t it, Mark? This doesn’t seem to be what men really want, does it? It’s
what Satan and his demons want.
Mark: The men are slaves.
Al: This may be
difficult, but I believe there’s more. I want you to take whatever time it
takes for God to reveal His mind about “what men want” to you. I want you to
experience the truth about pornography with the mind of Christ. Let’s ask God
to show you more. When we are finished, the meaning of pornography and the
faith you have about pornography will be totally changed. You’ll see it for what
it really is. I’ll pray. You just open your heart up to truth.
At this point Mark
closed his eyes for about a minute. With each passing second he seemed to
become more distressed and to sob harder and harder. Then he opened his
bloodshot eyes.
Mark: It’s terrible.
Al: Tell me exactly what
you saw, heard, and felt.
Mark: First I was in the
store. It was dim and smelly. I saw feces, blood, and vomit dripping from the
videos and other sex merchandise. The demons were lapping it up and laughing.
The men were blinded to it. Then I saw a montage of scenes!
Al: I want to hear about
it.
Mark: Families were being
torn apart. I heard a director say, ‘Cut,’ and I saw women who had been in a
porn movie crying. Others looked numb, even dead. Some were raging about their
miserable lives, saying they were all alone, sad, and used. Then…then I heard a
little girl’s voice crying in the background, and I knew that the same kingdom
that masterminds the adult porn industry masterminds child porn. And I
realized…I’ve been contributing to that!
Al: This is how God sees
it, because this is how it really is
to Him.
Mark: No wonder it breaks
His heart. At the end I saw this really odd scene. Jesus seemed like He was in
a huddle with some men, like a football team. He asked the men to do a job with
Him by taking a stand and fighting with Him against this evil---by fighting for
the crying child. But when the men came out of the huddle they all walked over
to the side of the demons, like they were friends, and joined their team! Their
mascot was a terrified little girl in chains, dressed up like a prostitute. And
I saw that I was one of those men!
I prayed again with
Mark, thanking the Holy Spirit for revealing His thoughts to Mark. Then we
continued…
…Al: This is the faith
about pornography God wants you to embrace, Mark. Whenever you find yourself
tempted to engage in porn, you have a very important choice to make. You can
either let yourself be led by the nose by a demon and buy the illusion that
‘this is what men want,’ or you can see it as God sees it and have faith that
what God says about pornography is true.
Mark: I see that.
Al: Whenever temptation
arises---and it will, Mark---immediately run to the scene God just showed you. Immediately! The
real choice is not to resist something you crave. The most fundamental choice
is about what kind of faith you’re going to have, for this determines what you crave. You will crave pornography or be revolted
by it depending on how you re-present it in your mind---depending on what faith
you hold about it.” (Greg Boyd and Al Larson, Escaping the Matrix p.134-6)
As long as Mark views pornography with the mind of Christ,
how much of a struggle do you think it will be for him to refrain from it? Just
how enticing do you think something dripping with feces, blood, and vomit can
be? Obviously it’s not enticing---it’s revolting, and if Mark trains his mind
to run to that scene and those scenes automatically whenever he’s tempted to
lust, I think he’s more likely to throw up than to want to keep viewing. Mark
is now on his way to living in the freedom available to him in Christ.
“Freedom is not about mustering up the willpower to abstain from doing
something you want to do. Rather, freedom is not wanting to do it anymore, and this is all about the faith we hold.
One cannot have faith that pornography or anything else is positive and not
desire it. To change one’s desire, one has to change one’s faith.” (Greg
Boyd and Al Larson, Escaping the Matrix p.130)
I think that’s the whole key to freedom right there: gaining
the mind of Christ on sin of any sort and running to that mind whenever
temptation arises. Eventually your mind will do this enough that it begins to
do it automatically and what was once a huge struggle becomes a victory and
testimony of God’s grace and redeeming power in your life. Praise God!
However, I’ve found it’s important to remember that seeing
sin for what it truly is is only the first step of the process of finding the
mind of Christ and of renewing my mind. I now have to find the mind of Christ
on holiness and desire that, for as St. Gregory the Great wrote, “If you do not delight in higher things, you
most certainly will delight in lower things.” If I forget this step it is
inevitable that I will either hate the sin I used to do only to inadvertently
fall into another one, or I will hate the sin but fall back into it anyway. To
use my Pastor’s analogy, until I quench my thirst from the well that has living
water, (John 4:13-14) even if I switch from one man-made well to another, my
thirst will never be quenched. I may be able to refrain from one sin, but until
I fill the vacuum left behind with Christ it can’t help but be filled with
something else, something I will also need deliverance from when I discover
that it cannot fill me either. Only Christ can satisfy.
I have long struggled to find the right words for the
imagery I have around this concept. Most of it I’ve derived from C.S. Lewis’s
book The Great Divorce, which is by
far my favorite book of his. The book is quite hard to describe if you’ve never
read it before, but in it Lewis gives those in hell a chance to visit heaven
and stay there if they wish, but most upon visiting it choose hell instead, as
they have all along throughout their life. If you can remember that far back by
now, (I’ve just about forgotten myself…) I also wrote some of The Great Divorce back in the section on
the first wound, and the passage I typed up near the end of 2006 (that you
really should read sometime) can be found here: http://www.xanga.com/cookie_monster44/547273705/the-great-divorce.html
At the end of that post I wrote what to this date has been
my most successful attempt to put in words the imagery I have around this
concept. Here’s what I wrote then:
“I've had a lot of fun with the ideas
in this passage this past month, especially the discussion on the lens of
time, but the reason I took the time to share this all with you is the mental
picture I've gotten over the size of a soul that clings to Hell in the midst of
Heaven. C.S. Lewis paints a wonderful picture of the comparative size and
volume of Heaven vs. Hell, and the souls contained therein. Hell, which in the
beginning of the book appears infinite to its inhabitants, is actually too
small and ghostly to even be measurable in Heaven. The souls it contains have
all shrunken around whatever they have chosen instead of Christ and his
abundant life. During their lifetime, they consistently chose death in some
form or another (all sin is death) rather than the life God offers
them, remaining in shadows as ghostly figures they were familiar
with rather than stepping into the world they were designed
for, a world too full of light for shadows and too real for
ghosts. . They clung to death, like the Dwarf to his chain, refusing to
let go and come alive, though the choice was his.
Taking the same imagery and placing it
within the bounds of time, the "picture of moments following one another and
yourself in each moment making some choice that might have been
otherwise," I got an
image of my soul shrinking slightly around something every time I chose
that something to whatever I knew God had chosen for me. Every time I cling to
sin in the presence of grace my soul wraps its folds closer around that sin,
leaving less room for God. But every time I face that choice and choose to let
go rather than cling, and instead embrace what God has for me, my soul grows
stronger, solider, and larger as it expands to make room for the piece of
Heaven it has chosen. And as I do so, the sin I let go of seems smaller than it
did before, especially when I let go of it consistently and choose Christ
instead. For a tangible example, let's use anger. I struggled with anger very
much when I was younger, especially during late middle school and early junior
high, much of it learned from, stemming from, and directed toward (although
anger can never truly be directed solely somewhere--as it lies undealt
with under the surface it erupts often when you least want it to) my dad's
struggles with alcoholism. At that time in my life, anger seemed like a really
big part of me. I lived in the midst of it, and it seemed really big and
unconquerable. But now that I've been learning to forgive my dad and see him as
he really is in Christ, the love of Christ has been entering my soul and
enlarging it, crowding out the anger in there for lack of room.
You see, another thing I've learned is
that you can't pull something out of your soul. I can't pull anger, bitterness,
pain, self-righteousness, lust, selfishness, fear, cruelty, or anything else
that has taken root in my soul, out. I may be able to, by focusing my efforts
on it, shrink my anger down by keeping a close watch on it, but I can never
completely control it, and the process of trying to control and remove it will
leave a vacuum that something else will undoubtedly fill. So trying
to pull something out never works, but it can be pushed out. The more I fill my
life with Christ the less space there is for anything not of Him, and He came
to give me overflowing life, so as I keep filling my soul with Him the rest of
the junk in me will eventually be kicked out for lack of room as my life begins
to overflow with Christ.
Do you see the difference between
pushing and pulling? It's all in the focus. If I am focused on the thing
itself, setting rules for myself about my conduct concerning it, the
very act of focusing on it makes it impossible to remove, but if I am
focused on Christ, the thing will fade away as it cannot compete with the
reality of His abundant life. Elisabeth Elliot wrote with a similar thought
process a quote from her book Passion and Purity that has stuck with me more than anything else she has written. About
her desires for marriage to Jim and the seemingly endless waiting stage they
were in, she wrote, "My heart was saying, 'Lord, take away this longing, or give me
that which I long for.' The Lord was answering, 'I must teach you to long for
something better'" The
solution isn't in more and better rules to guard and guide my conduct, but
in longing for, searching after, and clinging to Christ Himself.
Yesterday and today I have been
letting go of some things I've been clinging to for too long, though,
truthfully, my grip has been loosening for some time, and these past two days
were just the completion in the physical realm of what had already been
happening inside. It's been really good and I know I'm where I need to be right
now, but I also am aware that if I leave any open space in my soul,
they can quite easily enter right back in. Just like the man Jesus described in
Matthew 12: 43-45, if the space isn't occupied by Christ, something else will
surely occupy it.”
For my own part, in learning how to train my mind to find
the mind of Christ concerning pornography, the two images I’ve run to most
often are the image of the football huddle Mark mentioned at the end there and
one I’ve gathered from a short passage in The
Great Divorce. In this passage, Lewis is finally getting some answers to
the questions he has about what he’s been seeing in heaven and the
conversations he’s witnessed thus far. The visitors are all ghosts and are
encountering a world more solid than anything they’d ever imagined before, so
solid it hurts them terribly to even walk on the grass on account of how sharp
it is to them. One ghost in particular stands out to him on account of how
oblivious she is to her physical (or lack thereof) condition.
“I think the most
pitiable was a female ghost. Her trouble was exactly the opposite of that which
afflicted the other, the lady frightened by the Unicorns. This one seemed quite
unaware of her phantasmal appearance. More than one of the Solid People tried
to talk to her, and at first I was quite at a loss to understand her behaviour
to them. She appeared to be contorting her all but invisible face and writhing
her smokelike body in a quite meaningless fashion. At last I came to the
conclusion---as incredible as it seemed---that she supposed herself still
capable of attracting them and was trying to do so. She was a thing that had
become incapable of conceiving conversation save as a means to that end. If a
corpse already liquid with decay had arisen from the coffin, smeared its gums
with lipstick, and attempted a flirtation, the result could not have been more
appalling. In the end she muttered ‘Stupid creatures,’ and turned back to the
bus.” (C.S. Lewis, The Great Divorce p.76)
Many times when I find myself struggling I have run to this
picture and clung to it while I waited in Christ’s presence for the temptation
to pass. I have and will literally invite Christ in to that tempted place in my
heart and trust that He knows what to do in there. Then I exercise my imagination in a holy way,
turning all the thoughts and images I’m struggling with into smoke and placing
my heart in heaven, a place where it is secure and can find something better to
delight in. Surrounded by heaven, it is no longer interested in the smoke of
this earth, and the more vividly I imagine all this the less pull I find the
things of earth have on me. Sometimes I will stand with Christ and together
watch the things of this world turn into shadows. Or we may do something else
entirely. What imagery is used doesn’t really matter; this is just what I’ve
found that has been effective for me. What really matters is that I do it with
Christ and we do it together.
This is why I have found the imagination to be such a
powerful tool. Christ has been introduced to it and is active and present in
it, sanctifying it from the inside out. Together we are discovering the lies I
have long believed and been enslaved in and we are working together to lead
them to truth, and all this taking place at the root level where faith springs
from, my imagination.
Healing of Memories
As I wrote earlier, our memories have power only inasmuch as
they inspire our imaginations, and it’s not what has happened in the past but
what is currently happening in my mind that affects how I live my life today. Control
over my life in the present is found in how I control my mind in the present,
and the same is true for my future. But that doesn’t mean that the memories are
unimportant or can safely be ignored or left buried. Indeed, even though control is found in the present and I
can change my direction in life at any time in the present without regards to
my past, I firmly believe that real healing,
long-term, lifelong healing, is found in dealing with the past. Why? Because
the imagination draws its predictions about the present and future from conclusions
it has drawn from experiences in the past, and if those conclusions were
poisonous lies then they will consistently be presented to your imagination in
the present to be dealt with. And even
if you somehow learn to control them in the present, maybe even on a
consistent basis, the very act of
constantly fighting them will wear you
out.
Think, if you will, of memories as a water well the
imagination draws from. A memory stored with a lie encoded in it will quite
naturally poison the well. It may be entirely possible to purify the water at
the top of the well, in the imagination, and sometimes I think there are times
in our life where that’s all we can do, all we have the energy for. But in the
long run, if there are impurities poisoning the water at the bottom of the well
then it is highly impractical to ignore them and just hope they’ll go away. At
some point you have to dive the well and eradicate the poisons at the root of
the well, to re-enter the memory or memories where the wound came from that is
currently a toxic to your soul. You have to find healing for your memories.
I have some good news
for you all: Through Jesus, such healing is possible! Hallelujah! Amen!
“Healing of memories means forgiveness of
sin. It is the heart’s experience of forgiveness of sin at the precise sore
spot where it is needed, one that
impacts the soul in its totality---in its emotional, feeling, intuitive,
imaginative capacities as well as in its more conscious, willing, thinking
capacities. This place may be at any level of consciousness or unconsciousness.
Nothing illustrates God’s Healing Presence more wonderfully than His way of
healing man’s deepest hurts and memories.” (Leanne Payne, Restoring The
Christian Soul p.68)
We serve a wonderful God, one who knows us intimately and
passionately in spite of our deepest flaws and fears and the countless times
we’ve turned our back on Him. Instead of despising us for our sin, as we so
often feel like we deserve, He refuses to turn His back or give up on us and
instead offers hope and healing for us in those very same places we feel most
ashamed of. He loves us so much that He desires to see us whole again, as we
were created to be, and therefore refuses to let us wallow in our sin
undisturbed. He would rather the ugliness inside of us get exposed so it can be
dealt with than remain hidden where it can be ignored, and because of this He
will often intentionally place us in situations where what’s truly inside of us
gets revealed. As I quoted from John and Stasi Eldredge earlier:
“Jesus has to thwart
us too---thwart our self-redemptive plans, our controlling and our hiding,
thwart the ways we are seeking to fill the ache within us. Otherwise, we would
never fully turn to Him for our rescue. Oh, we might turn to Him for our
‘salvation,’ for a ticket to heaven when we die. We might turn to Him even in
the form of Christian service, regular church attendance, a moral life. But inside, our hearts remain broken and captive and
far from the One who can help us…
…Wherever it is we
have sought life apart from Him, He disrupts our plans, our ‘way of life’ which
is not life at all.” (John and Stasi Eldredge, Captivating p.96)
As the author of Hebrews quotes from Proverbs, “My son, do not make light of the Lord’s
discipline, and do not lose heart when He rebukes you, because the Lord
disciplines those He loves, and He punishes everyone He accepts as a son.”
He then goes on to write “Endure hardship
as a discipline; God is treating you as sons. For what son is not disciplined
by his father? If you are not disciplined (and everyone undergoes discipline),
then you are illegitimate children and not true sons. Moreover, we have all had
human fathers who disciplined us and we respected them for it. How much more
should we submit to the Father of our spirits and live! Our fathers disciplined
us for a little while as they thought best; but God disciplines us for our
good, that we may share in His holiness. No discipline seems pleasant at the
time, but painful. Later, however, it produces a harvest of righteousness and
peace for those who have been trained by it.” (Hebrews 12: 5-11)
Sin loves darkness, and as long as it remains safely tucked
away in the hidden corners of my soul it will be impossible to remove. It is
only when I do the difficult, often dirty work (because there are some
difficult, dirty, ugly things hidden away inside me) of letting Christ have
access to those hidden corners, of bringing His light into the midst of them
and exposing them that I can even begin to deal with them. This is why Jesus
said at the very beginning of His ministry, “Blessed
are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.” (Mat. 5:4). We’ve done a
lot of teaching about this at my church, and my Pastor paraphrases this verse
like this: “Blessed are those who get
outside what’s really going on inside, for they are the only ones who will
really receive the comfort God offers them.” That comfort is a sign of the
healing taking place inside as the true mourning takes place.
All that to say this: At
some point in your life you’re going to have to deal, one way or another, with
the wounds you’ve been dealt in this world. I knew that at the beginning of
this whole journey I’ve been on. That’s why I decided to be proactive about it,
rather than letting them fester to the point where I had no choice but to deal
with them because my life was in shambles. You may recall that I wrote this
earlier, at the conclusion of my section on wounds (a section which it might be
helpful for you to go back a re-read right now):
“An event happens,
maybe minor or maybe major, and you assign a meaning to it in your soul. The
event hurts, and you wonder what to do with the pain. At that moment, just as you decide what meaning an event
has, you can choose to accept the lie a fallen world and Satan would have you
believe about that event (and he has many for you to choose from), or you can
choose to find God’s perspective on that event and believe that, thereby
assigning that as the meaning of the
event. It is your choice. And you do
have a choice! It is to that moment
of the wounds you have received that you must return and change the decision
you made then about what the wound meant if you wish to be free from the power
of that wound and that memory.”
Remember that the part of you that is wounded has been
basically frozen in time. The lie you swallowed has kept you from maturing and
becoming more and more who you are in Christ. But now it’s time to be free of
the wound, to speak truth over the lie, and to do so you have to go back in
time and invite truth in at the moment the lie first took root. Going back in
time sounds impossible, but remember you are not going back to change what has happened (which is impossible),
but the meaning of what has happened.
This is indeed possible, but only because of two key components, the first
being the nature of memory. As I wrote about earlier, when we remember
something we don’t just remember that it happened, rather we re-experience it.
As I quoted from Boyd’s explanation of this earlier:
“The same network of
neurons that recorded the event are reactivated in the memory of the event.
From a neurological perspective it is as though the event were happening all
over again. This is essentially how all memories operate, though the network of
neurons that contains the memory can in time be associated with other networks
of neurons and thus morphed in the process.” (Greg Boyd, Seeing Is
Believing p. 73)
Through memory our past touches the present and guides our
future. And since we are constantly remembering in a sense we are also constantly
going back in time. Because everybody does this, it is possible for everyone to
go back and change the meaning of their memories. People do it all the time,
for good or for bad, and it is a capability that people like psychologists and
counselors take advantage of all the time in their professions. But there is another
component that separates what we as followers of Christ can do to find healing
with what the world can only attempt to do. Living inside of us is the healing
Presence, Christ in us, the hope of glory. He is the Creator of time and master
of it, and is therefore present to all of it right now.
“Time
too is a creature. It is created. That is a mind-blowing concept, but it is
true. Jesus, the infinite One, is outside of time, and all times are present to
Him.
‘To be God is to enjoy an infinite present where nothing has passed
away and nothing is still to come.’ (C.S. Lewis)
This means that all our times, together with
all that we are, are eternally present to God.” (Leanne Payne, Restoring The Christian Soul p.76)
“God
is outside of time; all times are one with the Creator of time. This is a vital
part of the Judeo-Christian truth system….It
is a wonderful thing to know that God is, even now at this very moment, present
to any and all trauma we have suffered. As we learn to invite Him into
these places, face the darkness, loneliness, and hurt with Him, and then set
our hearts to receive forgiveness, He heals and sets us free. It is a profound
ministry, vitally connected to the Christian confessional, whether formal or
informal.” (Leanne Payne, Restoring The Christian Soul p.94-95)
“In
prayer for the healing of memories, the power of the memory to make the past
present to us in a very real way is extraordinary. The reason for this, of course, is that Jesus, the Infinite One who is
outside of time and to whom all
times are present, enters into what for
us is a past occurrence, one known only in retrospect, though we experience its
consequences in the present. Here
the past-present-future time sequence in which we experience existence comes
together in a particularly meaningful way with the Eternal. And that which is
eternal within us [our Spirit, united with Christ] and therefore not bound by time is sparked. In this way we experience
past and present as one---a foretaste perhaps of a way of knowing earth-time we
shall one day experience when we are no longer bound by space, mass, and time.”
(Leanne Payne, The Broken Image p.23-24)
With the root memory now being re-lived in your soul, you
now can invite truth in to eradicate the lie. Since Jesus is the truth
(John 14:6), to uproot the lie you have to invite Him in. In my own search for healing, it was to those decisive
moments that I returned, but not alone. Just like I had learned to do with my imagination,
I re-entered those memories accompanied
by Christ and He helped me begin to learn how to forgive and receive
forgiveness.
“The essential action, that which
differentiates healing of memories from psychological methodologies, is the action of the Holy Spirit pointing
to the Presence of our Lord who
is there. He has, as it were, walked into
that darkest hell of our existence; and even in the midst of the unfolding
memory drama, we look with the eyes of our heart and (as so often happens) are
enabled to see Him. We receive
from Him that healing word, glance, or embrace we’ve so long needed. We forgive
others their darkest sins against us, and He forgives our sins, and we receive
from Him who manifest the very love of God the Father the healing grace we’ve
been unable to receive before. We find
out that He was there all along with that action, had we only been able to look
up and receive it.” (Leanne Payne, The Broken Image p.24)
I don’t know how to emphasize that last sentence strongly
enough. I really don’t. But it’s one of the sentences that I have written all
of this just to be able to share. Knowing that God hasn’t abandoned you, and
indeed truly was present at the time you thought He was most distant is what often
enables forgiveness to finally flow, both in giving and in receiving, and the
forgiveness is the key to healing the wound. I wish I could go into more depth
on forgiveness in this post, but I’ve sensed from the beginning that this isn’t
the right time to do so, so that will have to wait until some future post.
However, I will say at least this about forgiveness here: it is made possible
only through Christ. Indeed, as F.B. Meyer notes, prior to Christ, the world
could not even conceive of forgiveness.
“Forgiveness is the
exclusive prerogative of Christianity. The schools of ancient morality had four
cardinal virtues---justice in human relations, prudence in the direction of
affairs, fortitude in bearing trouble or sorrow, temperance or self-restraint.
But they knew nothing of mercy or forgiveness, which is not natural to the
human heart. Forgiveness is an exotic, which Christ brought with Him from
heaven.” (F.B. Meyer, Our Daily Walk p.142)
I think the best way to finish off this section is with a
story. In my first encounter with all of this material, back when I went to
Leanne Payne’s conference as a high school graduation gift from my parents in
2004, most of what was said went over my head. There were, however, a few
things I caught that made the whole trip worthwhile, especially this one. It
was the last day of the conference and all the attendees were preparing for our
last session, the prayer for healing of memories session. I still didn’t have a
solid grasp on what was going to happen and was nervous, though I knew from
what I had seen all week long at the conference that God was present and active
and doing wonderful things at this conference. What made me most nervous was
the unpredictability of what was about to happen.
Leanne Payne would be on stage praying for all of us in her
unique way; we were all to stay in our seats so as not to disturb others as God
was working in them. There was nothing to do but sit there and wait on God and
pray. A few days earlier at the conference I had learned (essentially for the
first time in my life) how to practice the presence of God, so as I sat there I
did so. As I did I received a picture blessed me and comforted me more deeply
than I’ve ever been able to express with words, and it’s a picture that I’ve shared
with countless people since and seen it bless them as well. God did bring a memory up that I had
completely forgotten about or repressed, and with it came understanding on a
lot of troubles I had been having. On the way home from the conference I attempted
to put into words what had happened. Like I said I’ve shared the first part of
it many, many times, but I’ve never shared the second part before, not even
with my dad (when he reads this it will be his first time seeing or hearing it).
I do so now because I think it’s time. Here’s what I wrote then:
“In the healing of
memory session, I practiced Christ’s presence. I saw Him holding my heart with
His hands. As the prayer progressed from infantile to mother to father
memories, I kept asking Him to reveal anything I needed to remember, but for
the longest time I had nothing and had to wait in His presence. Every time I
got anxious I would see His hands enfolded around my heart. Eventually, He
dredged up a memory about how my father would never let me cry if he could help
it. As He showed me this, and some of its implications, I really wanted to cry,
but could not. Maybe three or four minutes passed before the tears finally
came.
Father, why couldn’t
you let me cry? Why couldn’t you let me feel? Through your words and example
you taught me how to refuse the emotional, how to build walls around my heart
and protect it from anything soft. Pain brought your anger, and your anger
hurt, so I couldn’t show my pain. When I needed your compassion and love, you
gave me anger, yells, emotional withdrawal, and even drunkenness at times. You
taught me how to think and inspired me with your mental capacity, but never
balanced that out. Maybe this contributed to my struggles with introspection? I
don’t know right now. You also failed to teach me many things I needed to know,
things about God and His character.”
I had planned on going further and writing a full letter to
him but I ran out of words there. In retrospect I’m glad I stopped. What I
wrote was simply the pain I was getting in touch with; it stopped short of
anger or accusations. Even though some of it looks like accusations they really aren’t. I was getting out what
had been buried inside so it could be dealt with and it was a very freeing
experience.
Unfortunately, I wasn’t mature enough yet to be able to
forgive at that point in time, but some of the discoveries I made that day and
the work I did following it paved the way for some of the forgiveness and
reconciliation that would flow between Dad and I just over two years later,
which I wrote about in the section on the first wound, and has made such a huge
difference in my life.
“Healing of memories means forgiveness of sin. It is the heart’s
experience of forgiveness of sin at the precise sore spot where it is needed, one that impacts the soul in its totality”
(Leanne Payne, Restoring The Christian Soul p.68)
“Unforgiveness is like
swallowing poison and then waiting for the OTHER person to die” (taken from
a friend’s facebook, author unnamed).
Where I’m going
I wondered for a long time while writing this post how on
earth I could possibly find a fitting conclusion. Since what I’ve written is
about what I’ve been learning, and I’m always learning something new, I could
conceivably keep on writing forever without being finished. Where do you find
the cutting-off point? As I mentioned, I would love to write about forgiveness
somewhere in here, as it’s incredibly essential to healing and I’ve written
very little on it at all. I would also love to write about what I’ve learned
and begun to live about what I allow into my system, as I’ve phrased it, or as
my pastor phrases this concept, “What you feed your mind matters.” That’s one
of the central themes to renewing the mind, and I’ve barely touched on it in my
100+ pages of writing on renewing the mind and healing. But once again I never
really felt led to write about it here. It didn’t really seem to fit anywhere. Based
on similar situations in the past, what I’m guessing that means is that I’ll
have a chance somewhere in the future to write on it more fully, armed with
more knowledge and experience and wisdom than I do now, and when the time is
right God will lead me to do so. For now it’s best to wait. But I do at least
want to share a few scripture verses on it so it’s not ignored entirely and
because they’ve greatly helped me. (And if you want more, you can take a look
at some older posts I wrote on the topic, taken straight from a couple of
sermons I really appreciated from my pastor: http://www.xanga.com/cookie_monster44/462840614/item.html
http://www.xanga.com/cookie_monster44/466100350/what-you-feed-your-mind-matters.html
)
“No good tree bears
bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. Each tree is recognized by its
own fruit. People do not pick figs from thornbushes, or grapes from briars. The
good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the
overflow of his heart his mouth speaks.” (Jesus, Luke 6:43-45)
“Since, then, you have
been raised with Christ, set your heart
on things above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God. Set your mind on things above, not on
earthly things. For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in
God.” (Paul, Colossians 3:1-3)
“My son, pay attention
to what I say; listen closely to my words. Do not let them out of your sight,
keep them within your heart; for they are life to those who find them and
health to a man’s whole body. Above all
else, guard your heart, for it is the wellspring of life.” (Proverbs
4:20-23)
“These commandments
that I give you today are to be upon your hearts. Impress them on your children.
Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you
lie down and when you get up. Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them
on your foreheads. Write them on the doorframes of your homes and on your
gates.” (God, Deuteronomy 6:6-9)
“Thou wilt keep him in
perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee.” (Isaiah 26:3 KJV)
“Finally, brothers,
whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure,
whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable---if anything is excellent or
praiseworthy---think about such things.”
(Paul, Philippians 4:8)
I’ve also found myself singing this song all the time,
especially at work, to keep myself centered in Christ.
“To keep your lovely
face
Ever before my eyes
This is my prayer
Make it my strong
desire
That in my secret
heart
No other love competes
No rival throne
survives
And I serve only You.
(I Serve Only You) (I don’t know the author)
I’ve gone through this whole season of my life of healing
with one main purpose. I wanted to deal
with the past so that I could move freely into my future, so that all the
wounds and pain I was dealing with could be dealt with once and for all and
that I would learn how to deal with any future ones that I discovered. I wanted
to learn how to be broken by sin, not wounded by it. Along the way I had to
keep in mind something Mario Bergner wrote, that my journey and commitment was not to healing, but to Jesus. What I
discovered is that while there are many things I can do to deal with wounds
once and for all, there are many more that have to be done on a constant basis.
It’s easy to slip back into unforgiveness and bitterness when you forget all
that Christ has done for you, and it’s easy to forget if you don’t keep your
mind centered on Him and instead fill it with other junk. As is always the
case, it’s in practicing His presence, the healing Presence, that the solution
can be found. Christ in us, the hope of glory. (Col. 1:27) Since I did this all to
deal with the past so I can move on freely into my future, I can think of no
better way to bring this to a finish than to share with you where I’m planning
on going in my future.
Ever since I first received my call in life from God, I’ve
had direction and a future. I’ve also known ever since then that what He has
called me to was impossible. No man could do it, yet I had no doubt He had
called me to it. Only Jesus could, and only Jesus did, so I knew that the only
possible way for me to live up to my calling was for Jesus to live it through
me. I also knew that since He had called me to it it was His responsibility to
complete it in me; my job was only to obey. For my graduation yearbook I was
given a paragraph to write a little about me in, and what I wrote then (in what
was a desert period of my life) sums up well my thoughts and beliefs on this.
(Also, I think I may be the only person to ever quote Winnie the Pooh in their
graduation yearbook…)
“Wow! I made it! High
school is finally over and now I am looking straight into---gulp---adulthood.
As Winnie the Pooh would say, ‘Oh Bother!’ Still, I know He who is able to keep
me from falling and to present me before His glorious presence without fault
and with great joy, (Jude 24); and I know the One who calls me is faithful and
He will do it, (1 Thes. 5:24). So I will not fear, though the valley of the
shadow of death awaits me.
For only in death can
resurrection be found.”
The call on my life has never been to any specific thing,
unlike some people I know have gotten. When God called me to follow Him what He
called me to was to become a different type of person. Because of that, I’ve
never been concerned much since then with what I’m supposed to do; the question
has always been “who do I want to be,” rather than “what do I want to do.” I
figure God will take care of the “what I do” in His time, which He has thus
far, guiding me one step at a time, but if I don’t continually dwell in the
transformation and becoming place of dwelling in Christ then no matter what I
do, it’s not going to make a difference or even make me happy (as if that were
the goal). With that said, though, I do
know some things about where I’m headed in life, activity-wise, and this is a
good place to share some of that.
God has blessed me with a wonderful business opportunity and
some life-changing mentors. I’ve put much of that to the side, as I did many
things while I’ve been in this healing process so I could focus on what I knew
needed to be done. But now that I’m finished with that season of my life, it’s
time to get serious about my future. I’ve been working at Davannis for nearing
two years now, at first because I needed a job but now more so because it was a
wonderful fit for this past season of my life due mostly to the low-stress
environment, flexible schedule, and good people. But I don’t really want to
work there the rest of my life, obviously. So I plan on building my business up
to be able to take over and improve upon my Davannis income in the near future.
Also, I’ve been wanting to go to a place called the Honor Academy
for a long time now, but God has kept telling me to wait every time I asked
Him. As frustrating as that was at the time, obedience there (and being stuck
at home) was what allowed me to go through this healing process. But ever since
December I’ve been sensing that the time is right to go, and if I am accepted
and raise enough money I am planning on going in mid-August. The Honor Academy,
for those of you who aren’t familiar with it, is a yearlong spiritual
discipleship program way down in Texas, focused on developing leaders for the
next generation and equipping missionaries both to this country and any other.
It costs $650 a month to live there, but I’m estimating that with the cost of
health insurance, car insurance, and other odds and ends, I will need somewhere
around $1000 a month to be ok. So that’s my goal for the summer: to make $1000+
in passive income working with my business team that will last me all year long
and be something to build on when I come back. Now that’s a bit ambitious, I
know, but I believe it’s possible, and I believe that Texas is where God wants
me, so I’ll be working my butt off this summer to do everything I can to make
it happen. I’ve been encouraged by this quote from a book one of my mentors
recommended to me (The Pursuit, by Dexter Yager), “Unless you take on more than you can possibly do, you will never do
all that you can.” So that’s my goal, and any and all prayers would be
appreciated. If I happen to come to your mind over this summer, if you could
lift up a prayer for me I’d appreciate it.
Thanks for reading all of this (unless you just skipped to
the end. If you did, shame on you! You missed all the good stuff!) I would love to hear your thoughts, be they
well-developed or brief. Or even if you just want to let me know you read it
through, that’d be appreciated too. I’ve spent a long, long time writing
this, more than I ever imagined it would take, but I think it was worth it. I’m
also gladder than you’ll ever know to be done! It’s time to move on! 100+ pages
is too many and wears a person out, as I now know from experience!
I’m going to conclude with three things that I think share
where I’m going and who I’m becoming better than anything else I’ve yet to find
or write. The first is my answer to the challenge “name five things you want to
do before your life is over,” that I spent some good time pondering over and
came up with some answers that resonate deep in my soul. The second is a
passage from a book that I’ve shared before; it’s a passage that I’ve found
very descriptive of the kind of person I want to be.
The third is something I’ve rarely shared before, but it’s
something I’ve been working on for a long time now. When I first received God’s
call on my life, the word I used to describe that call was “intercessor,”
because that’s the only word I had at the time to describe the kind of life God
had called me to. But since then I’ve discovered that the common use of
intercessor among Christians doesn’t quite cover all that I really felt called
to, so since I discovered that I’ve been trying to put into words pictures and
phrases of the kind of life I want to lead. I originally wrote them as “I want
to be” statements, but since then I’ve decided that that phrase isn’t accurate,
for in Christ I already am that kind of person, so I changed it to “I am”
statements. I think it’s more accurate that way, and it reminds me of who I am
in Christ when I say or read them that way, but I also know that I’m still a
work in progress. I am still “becoming
who I am” and I remember that “To the
Christian, all becoming is incarnational--it is a life that is poured into us from on high. That Life is Jesus.”
(Mario Bergner, Setting Love in Order p. 100) Writing who I want to be has been very hard to do, as words
don’t come easily to those kinds of things, or at least they don’t to me, but
what I have been able to get and collect thus far, though incomplete, will be
the third thing.
5
Things I want to do before my life is over:
I want to win her heart, live with her
by my side, and father our child.
I want to spend a year living at an
orphanage.
I want to sing a song with all my
heart.
I want to spend an evening in prayer
with Larry Winters.
I want to go on a forty day fast.
A Man of Passion
By Bruce Marchiano
From the book The Character of a Man
Passion---the grasping of life and love and all the wondrous
adventure God intends for life and love to be…
A man reaches to his wife---his bride---with all that he is.
He exalts and treasures her. He covers her with goodness and blankets her with
blessing. He counts the “very hairs of [her] head” (Matthew 10:30) and pursues
and relishes her. Taking nothing for granted, he approaches every day as if
tomorrow may never come, as indeed, it very well may not.
He wakes every morning---a man who knows who he is and what
his life is all about. He rises from every challenge that would steal his
excitement and beat him down. He stares the enemies of his soul and life’s
potential straight in the eye and says, “I’m a child of the living God, and
you’re not going to crush even a moment of the thrill.”
He fights off the lukewarm and embraces the red hot. He
casts down the pull that would draw him to wander from entertainment to
entertainment. And a day becomes a year becomes twenty becomes a lifetime.
Refusing mediocrity, he rolls up his sleeves and dives into
each day. He shakes free of fatigue and the aches and pains of life lived in a
broken creation, and like an Olympic sprinter in the starting blocks, he digs
his heels firmly into every responsibility and purpose God intends for him.
He explodes toward the finish line. He runs “the race” of
life in such a way as to “win the prize”---the prize he’s already won in Christ
Jesus (2 Timothy 4:7; Philippians 3:14).
He worships God. He falls flat on his face and thrusts his
hands high in the air. Again, taking nothing for granted, he seeks with all
that he is. He cries tears of joy and tears of need and cries out, “Glory,
glory!” as he worships his God.
The zeal of the LORD Almighty will
accomplish this.
~Isaiah 9:7
Jesus, Jesus, Jesus! Glory to the name of Jesus!
I am:
-A man who enters the battle
determined to win or die, or both if need be.
-A man who is constantly proclaiming
the victory, especially in the darkest hours.
-A man who knows what real victory is,
knows where the real battle is fought, and refuses to fight with the same
weapons the world uses.
-A man who remembers that real victory
in God’s eyes often looks like real failure in the world’s eyes.
- A man who knows where his strength
comes from and will do anything and everything he can to stay connected to that
source. I will not rely on or even recognize any strength of my own.
- A man who knows that the highest
honor on earth is that of serving, the highest calling on earth is that of a servant,
and the greatest joys in life are found in giving.
- A man who is humble enough to allow
others to serve me, too, to allow them to serve Christ as they serve me, just
as I serve Christ when I serve them.
- A man who delights especially in
serving and blessing those who can never hope to repay me, who never understand
why I serve them, or who hate me for serving them.
- A man who believes the world is won
by tired men fighting on in their weakness---men who will die before they quit.
- A man who recognizes and affirms the
uniqueness and beauty and preciousness of every daughter of Eve I encounter.
-the one man in a woman or girl’s
life, whether she be someone I know closely or just passed on the street and
will never see again, who will not look at her with lust in his heart.
- A man who calls forth all that is
feminine in Eve’s daughters.
- A man who guards Eve’s daughter’s
hearts from all that would plunder, destroy, tear down, trample, deceive,
humiliate, dishonor, condemn, insult, neglect, use, compare, or misname them.
-financially responsible.
-A channel through whom God can pour
His resources into those in need of them.
-A man who says “let’s pray” rather
than “I’ll pray for you.”
-A man who always speaks the name of
Jesus with tenderness and joy.
-A vessel through whom God can affirm
others.
-A gifted blesser, eager to bless.
-Able to put to words all the good I
can see in others and to offer those words to them.
-The first man to the cross when there
is a call for repentance. I want to be the one who unashamedly runs to the
cross when I know I’ve been down the wrong path. In my repentance I want to run
back with all my heart.
-A man who never speaks or hears the
name of Jesus without recognizing and acknowledging the presence of Jesus.
“May the God of peace,
who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our
Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good
for doing His will, and may He work in us what is pleasing to Him, through
Jesus Christ, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.” (Hebrews 13:20-21)
Eternally united with Christ,
ever Beloved,
Joe |